Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Troubles and troubles

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
    15 Posts 6 Posters 2.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      exograpix
      last edited by

      Finally reverted back to old package, working fine for now. Waiting for 2.2 become stable.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        doktornotor Banned
        last edited by

        Nice rant, zero useful info.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          phil.davis
          last edited by

          Tell us:
          What you are trying to achieve
          What you have tried to set up so far
          What errors you get
          What works and what does not work
          Screenshots/settings…

          Then someone can help you.
          There is no way we can help based on your original post.

          As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
          If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            Cino
            last edited by

            I recall a disclaimer with 2.2 in regards to packages.

            
Packages

While the most popular packages should be fine, lesser-used ones may not have been updated by their maintainer, or may not be well-tested and have issues. If you’re dependent on packages, we encourage you to test your combination of packages before upgrading in production.
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              phil.davis
              last edited by

              @Cino:

              I recall a disclaimer with 2.2 in regards to packages.

              
Packages

While the most popular packages should be fine, lesser-used ones may not have been updated by their maintainer, or may not be well-tested and have issues. If you’re dependent on packages, we encourage you to test your combination of packages before upgrading in production.

              and this is a free open source project.
              If you are interested in particular packages, then step up to the plate and get involved in helping to maintain them.
              If you do not have the skills to debug the code, then contribute in some other way, or put in some cash to pay someone to update the packages.
              There is no magic here - if everyone puts in appropriate resources then (hundreds of) thousands of people/installations benefit. Please all do your bit and then report problems in a friendly way so that others who have put in effort also (but maybe introduced a bug accidentally ;) ) do not feel like they are being attacked.

              As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
              If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • X
                xbipin
                last edited by

                seems like some1 wants free stuff to work out of the box without putting in any effort, no1 is a slave and under no obligation to fix things when u want them to fix so better help in fixing it or just look elsewhere

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  exograpix
                  last edited by

                  This is wrong, I am ready to pay for the services , but as per the effort is concerned, most of us are non programmer relying on you guys for solutions.

                  Please note, if we are using open source product in our companies and putting our time in installing and providing the feedback , we are equally important in line to making this product worthwhile. Only issue is when setup and work get held up due to non information and non standard packages and information is at best sketchy (i am grateful to you guys putting your effort).

                  I do request you that the process of implementing a package with certain goal in mind like firewall, basic utility like web filtering, antivirus etc should work out of the box, and other packages can be developed in due course.

                  I am ready to pay for the package and one of my bounty is still open if pfsense give the above services out of the box, it will only help us in making the package worthwhile in the long run. I appreciate the pfsense developers efforts, specially when it is  open source.

                  If at all you guys are offended, I regret my post.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    doktornotor Banned
                    last edited by

                    Which on the many suggestions here regarding the squid/squidguard/clamav/whatnot you researched and with what results?  We do not even know what packages and versions you installed, geez… also, posting such "details" link pfSense version seems too much to ask?! You post zero useful information to debug anything, fail to describe any of the troubles -- yet asking for help and getting suprised you don't warm welcome?  ::) :o

                    @exograpix:

                    I do request you that the process of implementing a package with certain goal in mind like firewall, basic utility like web filtering, antivirus etc should work out of the box, and other packages can be developed in due course.

                    See, I for one have zero interest in web censorship or running an antivirus on the firewall (the only free available one sucks goats nuts detection-wise and is just a piece of incredible resource hog.)

                    >>> http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html <<<

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      exograpix
                      last edited by

                      Point taken, antivirus is not important, but what about web filtering.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kejianshi
                        last edited by

                        I like DNS based filtering if you just have to filter.  Lots of free services.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          doktornotor Banned
                          last edited by

                          @exograpix:

                          Point taken, antivirus is not important, but what about web filtering.

                          Sir, you either post some info to work with - or move to paid support and pay for their time so that they can get that info themselves and charge you for it at the same time. I personally am not going to waste a single more minute with totally unproductive rants. Produce some meat here to work with, or don't waste bandwidth and DB space.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P
                            phil.davis
                            last edited by

                            @phil.davis:

                            Tell us:
                            What you are trying to achieve
                            What you have tried to set up so far
                            What errors you get
                            What works and what does not work
                            Screenshots/settings…

                            Then someone can help you.
                            There is no way we can help based on your original post.

                            Give information like above, then people who know the various packages can either give you help about how to set it up, or debug the problems and fix the packages.

                            As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                            If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • E
                              exograpix
                              last edited by

                              Thanks,

                              I am facing following issues :

                              a. I have installed fresh pfsense 2.2        (okay)
                              b. Created a certificate (okay)
                              c. Loaded squid3 (okay and successful)
                              d. Configured https (men in middle) and saved (done)
                              e. loaded squidguard 3 ( signature checking off) (loaded okay)
                              f. No system patch loaded (like in pfsense 2.1.5)
                              g. Loaded shallalist (loaded successfully)
                              h. Apply setting to squidguard (done)
                              i. checked web filtering (okay)

                              Restarted, now squidguard service is not started and even page is not loading. tried to load this service manually but no avail.
                              Tried to do various combinations but service is still off

                              Finally reverted to older version and 10 hours gone waste.

                              Please give me some advice on this issue.

                              I donot require antivirus , just the filtering.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • E
                                exograpix
                                last edited by

                                Please note i am using transparent proxy

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.