Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfSense 2.2: Squid 3.4.10_2 pkg 0.2.6 redirection not working in transparent mode

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cache/Proxy
    49 Posts 9 Posters 13.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      Steve Evans
      last edited by

      So, due to my use of aliases my rule did show up with your grep.

      : grep SquidProxy /tmp/rules.debug
      SquidProxy = "{   3128 }"
      pass  in log  quick  on $LAN inet proto tcp  from any to any port $SquidProxy tracker 1422139913 flags S/SA keep state  label "USER_RULE: Squid Proxy"
      

      I realise my rules for proxy access were too weak as they would have allowed somebody on my network to use alternate proxy, so I've modified my rules thus, but this hasn't fixed transparency mode.  :(

      pass  in log  quick  on $LAN inet proto tcp  from any to $pfSense port $SquidProxy tracker 1422139913 flags S/SA keep state  label "USER_RULE: Squid Proxy"
      pass  in log  quick  on $LAN inet proto tcp  from any to (self) port $SquidProxy tracker 1422382055 flags S/SA keep state  label "USER_RULE: Squid Proxy loopback"
      

      Thanks,

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • marcellocM
        marcelloc
        last edited by

        Include 127.0.0.1 on your 3128 rule too.

        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

        Help a community developer! ;D

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          Steve Evans
          last edited by

          Is that not the same as self?

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • marcellocM
            marcelloc
            last edited by

            @Steve:

            Is that not the same as self?

            I don't know if is lan ip or any local ip (including lo0)

            Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

            Help a community developer! ;D

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              Steve Evans
              last edited by

              Changed rules to

              : grep SquidProxy /tmp/rules.debug
              SquidProxy = "{   3128 }"
              pass  in log  quick  on $LAN inet proto tcp  from any to $pfSense port $SquidProxy tracker 1422139913 flags S/SA keep state  label "USER_RULE: Squid Proxy"
              pass  in log  quick  on $LAN inet proto tcp  from any to 127.0.0.1 port $SquidProxy tracker 1422382055 flags S/SA keep state  label "USER_RULE: Squid Proxy loopback"
              
              

              No improvement.

              Steve

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                Steve Evans
                last edited by

                To prove the point that the redirected transparent connection is not getting through to squid, I stopped the squid process and then ran the following on the pfSense console.

                : nc -l 3128
                

                I then telnetted to pfsense from my laptop and a connection was established and characters passed.

                $ telnet 10.5.1.1 3128
                Trying 10.5.1.1...
                Connected to pfsense.scevans.com.
                Escape character is '^]'.
                hello
                
                : nc -Dl 3128
                hello
                

                I repeated trying to telnet to port 80 on news.bbc.co.uk which should have been directed by the redirect, and no connection was made.

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  Steve Evans
                  last edited by

                  I've now turn off transparent mode and then added a NAT rule.

                  This appears in /tmp/rules.debug thus.

                  rdr on msk2 proto tcp from any to !10.5.1.0/24 port 80 -> 10.5.1.1 port 3128
                  

                  I see the resulting packet to port 3128 being passed by the firewall in the logs on an attempt to access an external host on port 80 from LAN.

                  With squid stopped and running

                  nc -vl 3128
                  

                  instead on the pfSense console this connection attempt is not seen.

                  Contacting pfSense directly from the LAN on port 3128 does get through.

                  Clearly the HTTP request gets redirected to port 3128, makes it through the firewall, but then gets lost.

                  I'm stumped.

                  Steve

                  redirectNAT.png
                  redirectNAT.png_thumb

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • marcellocM
                    marcelloc
                    last edited by

                    May be not related to the issue but do you have pfsense gui redirect enabled under system -> advanced?

                    All my testes were on pfsense 2.2 amd64, no cf or nanobsd.

                    What 2.2 version are you using?

                    Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                    Help a community developer! ;D

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      Steve Evans
                      last edited by

                      I have the Disable webConfigurator redirect rule checkbox ticked as I have WPAD running on port 80 using the vHosts web server. Unfortunately iPhones etc don't use WPAD so I need transparency mode, but I've left it turned on for now.

                      I'm using the recent full 2.2 release.

                      I've just tried putting a pass all rule at the start of my LAN rules to see if that would fix any firewall issue, but it did no good.

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • marcellocM
                        marcelloc
                        last edited by

                        2.2 amd64?

                        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                        Help a community developer! ;D

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          Steve Evans
                          last edited by

                          : uname -a
                          FreeBSD pfsense.scevans.com 10.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p4 #0 36d7dec(releng/10.1)-dirty: Thu Jan 22 15:19:32 CST 2015     root@pfsense-22-i386-builder:/usr/obj.i386/usr/pfSensesrc/src/sys/pfSense_wrap.10.i386  i386
                          : cat /etc/version
                          2.2-RELEASE
                          
                          

                          I've just rebooted the firewall with all pf rules reverted to those in /conf.default/config.xml. This should eliminate any firewall rule peculiarities. I'll let you know how that works once it's up.

                          Thanks,

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • marcellocM
                            marcelloc
                            last edited by

                            I have two users on portuguese forum with same version 2.2-RELEASE-i386 and same issue.

                            Maybe it's related to squid pbi package compilation under i386 system.

                            Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                            Help a community developer! ;D

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              Steve Evans
                              last edited by

                              Interesting.

                              Given that I see the lack of redirection with nc as well as squid I'm inclined to think this may not be an issue with squid at all, but rather with pf. That'd be quite a fundamental problem for pfSense!

                              I made THIS post in the Firewalling forum to see if that provides any insight. For now I'm going to see if a minimal pf configuration helps.

                              Thanks,

                              Steve

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                Steve Evans
                                last edited by

                                With the default firewall rules, squid is still not working in transparent mode.

                                As you're seeing multiple reports of this, could you please raise a bug report that captures the collective experience.

                                Thanks,

                                Steve

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • marcellocM
                                  marcelloc
                                  last edited by

                                  @Steve:

                                  With the default firewall rules, squid is still not working in transparent mode.

                                  As you're seeing multiple reports of this, could you please raise a bug report that captures the collective experience.

                                  Thanks,

                                  Steve

                                  I'll need to create an i386 virtual machine to get same problem. On all my labs, transparent proxy is working fine.

                                  Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                  Help a community developer! ;D

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    Steve Evans
                                    last edited by

                                    OK, thanks.

                                    I thought the following might be of use to confirm the squid configuration I have installed.

                                    : squid -v
                                    Squid Cache: Version 3.4.10
                                    configure options:  '--with-default-user=squid' '--bindir=/usr/local/sbin' '--sbindir=/usr/local/sbin' '--datadir=/usr/local/etc/squid' '--libexecdir=/usr/local/libexec/squid' '--localstatedir=/var' '--sysconfdir=/usr/local/etc/squid' '--with-logdir=/var/log/squid' '--with-pidfile=/var/run/squid/squid.pid' '--with-swapdir=/var/squid/cache' '--enable-auth' '--enable-build-info' '--enable-loadable-modules' '--enable-removal-policies=lru heap' '--disable-epoll' '--disable-linux-netfilter' '--disable-linux-tproxy' '--disable-translation' '--disable-arch-native' '--enable-eui' '--enable-cache-digests' '--enable-delay-pools' '--enable-ecap' '--disable-esi' '--enable-follow-x-forwarded-for' '--enable-htcp' '--enable-icap-client' '--enable-icmp' '--enable-ident-lookups' '--enable-ipv6' '--enable-kqueue' '--with-large-files' '--enable-http-violations' '--without-nettle' '--enable-snmp' '--enable-ssl' '--enable-ssl-crtd' '--disable-stacktraces' '--disable-ipf-transparent' '--disable-ipfw-transparent' '--enable-pf-transparent' '--with-nat-devpf' '--disable-forw-via-db' '--enable-wccp' '--enable-wccpv2' '--enable-auth-basic=DB MSNT MSNT-multi-domain NCSA PAM POP3 RADIUS fake getpwnam LDAP NIS' '--enable-auth-digest=file' '--enable-external-acl-helpers=file_userip time_quota unix_group LDAP_group' '--enable-auth-negotiate=kerberos wrapper' '--enable-auth-ntlm=fake smb_lm' '--enable-storeio=ufs aufs diskd' '--enable-disk-io=AIO Blocking IpcIo Mmapped DiskThreads DiskDaemon' '--enable-log-daemon-helpers=file' '--enable-url-rewrite-helpers=fake' '--enable-storeid-rewrite-helpers=file' '--with-openssl=/usr' '--prefix=/usr/local' '--mandir=/usr/local/man' '--infodir=/usr/local/info/' '--build=i386-portbld-freebsd10.1' 'build_alias=i386-portbld-freebsd10.1' 'CC=cc' 'CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe  -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -fstack-protector -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -fno-strict-aliasing' 'LDFLAGS= -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -pthread -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib -fstack-protector' 'LIBS=' 'CPPFLAGS=' 'CXX=c++' 'CXXFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -fstack-protector -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -fno-strict-aliasing  -Wno-unused-private-field' 'CPP=cpp' 'PKG_CONFIG=pkgconf' --enable-ltdl-convenience
                                    

                                    Steve

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      Steve Evans
                                      last edited by

                                      Now here's an oddity. There are two squid binaries installed. Potential for inconsistencies here…

                                      : which squid
                                      /usr/local/sbin/squid
                                      : /usr/local/sbin/squid -v 
                                      Squid Cache: Version 3.4.10
                                      configure options:  '--with-default-user=squid' '--bindir=/usr/local/sbin' '--sbindir=/usr/local/sbin' '--datadir=/usr/local/etc/squid' '--libexecdir=/usr/local/libexec/squid' '--localstatedir=/var' '--sysconfdir=/usr/local/etc/squid' '--with-logdir=/var/log/squid' '--with-pidfile=/var/run/squid/squid.pid' '--with-swapdir=/var/squid/cache' '--enable-auth' '--enable-build-info' '--enable-loadable-modules' '--enable-removal-policies=lru heap' '--disable-epoll' '--disable-linux-netfilter' '--disable-linux-tproxy' '--disable-translation' '--disable-arch-native' '--enable-eui' '--enable-cache-digests' '--enable-delay-pools' '--enable-ecap' '--disable-esi' '--enable-follow-x-forwarded-for' '--enable-htcp' '--enable-icap-client' '--enable-icmp' '--enable-ident-lookups' '--enable-ipv6' '--enable-kqueue' '--with-large-files' '--enable-http-violations' '--without-nettle' '--enable-snmp' '--enable-ssl' '--enable-ssl-crtd' '--disable-stacktraces' '--disable-ipf-transparent' '--disable-ipfw-transparent' '--enable-pf-transparent' '--with-nat-devpf' '--disable-forw-via-db' '--enable-wccp' '--enable-wccpv2' '--enable-auth-basic=DB MSNT MSNT-multi-domain NCSA PAM POP3 RADIUS fake getpwnam LDAP NIS' '--enable-auth-digest=file' '--enable-external-acl-helpers=file_userip time_quota unix_group LDAP_group' '--enable-auth-negotiate=kerberos wrapper' '--enable-auth-ntlm=fake smb_lm' '--enable-storeio=ufs aufs diskd' '--enable-disk-io=AIO Blocking IpcIo Mmapped DiskThreads DiskDaemon' '--enable-log-daemon-helpers=file' '--enable-url-rewrite-helpers=fake' '--enable-storeid-rewrite-helpers=file' '--with-openssl=/usr' '--prefix=/usr/local' '--mandir=/usr/local/man' '--infodir=/usr/local/info/' '--build=i386-portbld-freebsd10.1' 'build_alias=i386-portbld-freebsd10.1' 'CC=cc' 'CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe  -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -fstack-protector -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -fno-strict-aliasing' 'LDFLAGS= -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -pthread -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib -fstack-protector' 'LIBS=' 'CPPFLAGS=' 'CXX=c++' 'CXXFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -fstack-protector -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -fno-strict-aliasing  -Wno-unused-private-field' 'CPP=cpp' 'PKG_CONFIG=pkgconf' --enable-ltdl-convenience
                                      : /usr/pbi/squid-i386/local/sbin/squid -v
                                      Shared object "libmd5.so.0" not found, required by "squid"
                                      

                                      Steve

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • marcellocM
                                        marcelloc
                                        last edited by

                                        @Steve:

                                        Now here's an oddity.

                                        This is one of pbi behaviors. same binary, different folder, different results. (Imagine get all it working together :))

                                        And here is the confirmation that pbi build on i386 is outdated

                                        '--disable-ipf-transparent' '--disable-ipfw-transparent'
                                        

                                        Go to amd64 and it will work  :)

                                        Thanks for your feedback

                                        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                        Help a community developer! ;D

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          Steve Evans
                                          last edited by

                                          Hi Marcelloc,

                                          As I'm running on a Pentium-M on a Watchguard Firebox x750e I'm afraid that I'm constrained somewhat to only running 32 bit. That said, one of the great things about pfSense is it's a great application to run on older hardware, so thanks for keeping the i386 version alive!

                                          How soon might a package update for i386 be forthcoming would you guess?

                                          Thanks again,

                                          Steve

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • marcellocM
                                            marcelloc
                                            last edited by

                                            Just wait core team to compile it again. The compile args were fixed few weeks ago but only amd64 was rebuild.

                                            Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                            Help a community developer! ;D

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.