Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Atom D525 Inaccurate Temperature Readings

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    18 Posts 4 Posters 3.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Snapshots of the current build of 2.2 (which is still in alpha) are available here:
      http://snapshots.pfsense.org
      2.2 is built on FreeBSD 10-rel so should include this patch. It will allow you to test it before 2.2 is released to decide if you need to try some other solution.

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        BeerCan
        last edited by

        I am using the 2.2 snapshot on my home pfsense box and temps are working correctly on my atom d510.  The temps did not work correctly on 2.1.x  so it looks like the patch made it.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          Nonsense
          last edited by

          Stephen wrote:

          "Have you tried a 2.2 snapshot? Those should have the patch included already."

          I downloaded and installed v. 2.2 when it was released last week, but I don't see any difference in CPU temperature reporting.  Isn't the patch in the final version?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            I don't see it in the source:
            https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/10.1.0/sys/dev/coretemp/coretemp.c?revision=274417&view=markup

            :(

            What does your install report the tjmax as:

            [2.2-RELEASE][root@xtm5.localdomain]/root: sysctl -a | grep tjmax
            dev.cpu.0.coretemp.tjmax: 85.0C
            dev.cpu.1.coretemp.tjmax: 85.0C
            
            

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N
              Nonsense
              last edited by

              $ sysctl -a | grep tjmax
              dev.cpu.0.coretemp.tjmax: 100.0C
              dev.cpu.1.coretemp.tjmax: 100.0C
              dev.cpu.2.coretemp.tjmax: 100.0C
              dev.cpu.3.coretemp.tjmax: 100.0C

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Do you see this in the boot logs:
                coretemp0: <cpu on-die="" thermal="" sensors="">on cpu0
                coretemp0: Can not get Tj(target) from your CPU, using 100C.

                The correct tjmax value for the D525 seems to be mostly reported as 100C with some reports of 125C.

                Steve</cpu>

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  mir
                  last edited by

                  If coretemp for some reason is reported wrongly you can adjust the readings. This is what I have in /boot/loader.conf.local:

                  dev.amdtemp.0.sensor_offset=-6

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Unfortunately a similar control doesn't exist in the coretemp driver.

                    Steve

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N
                      Nonsense
                      last edited by

                      The only relevant thing I see in the boot log ("general" log tab):

                      Jan 28 01:42:35 kernel: coretemp3: <cpu on-die="" thermal="" sensors="">on cpu3
                      Jan 28 01:42:35 kernel: coretemp2: <cpu on-die="" thermal="" sensors="">on cpu2
                      Jan 28 01:42:35 kernel: coretemp1: <cpu on-die="" thermal="" sensors="">on cpu1
                      Jan 28 01:42:35 kernel: coretemp0: <cpu on-die="" thermal="" sensors="">on cpu0

                      By the way, on a different subject, do I have to worry about this other message in the boot log(?):

                      Jan 28 01:42:35 kernel: iwi_monitor: If you agree with the license, set legal.intel_iwi.license_ack=1 in /boot/loader.conf.
                      Jan 28 01:42:35 kernel: iwi_monitor: You need to read the LICENSE file in /usr/share/doc/legal/intel_iwi/.</cpu></cpu></cpu></cpu>

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Hmm, looks like it's correctly finding and reading the tjmax value from the CPU then.  :-\

                        Those license warnings are nothing to worry about. You can add the ack values to loader.conf.local to make them go away if you want.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.