PfSense 2.2 and Squid

marcelloc

What 2.2 version? amd64, i386,nano?

djzort

there was a decision to move the paths around inside the squid module which seems to have been done hastily. see also https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=87969.0

ditrone

what i currently get from lightsquid with 2.2 & squid3
was working before upgrade
https://myrouter/lightsquid/index.cgi

Software error:
Can't locate /usr/local/etc/lightsquid/lightsquid.cfg in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/mach/5.18 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.18/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.18 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.18 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.18/mach . /usr/local/www/lightsquid/) at /usr/local/www/lightsquid/index.cgi line 17.

KOM

To fix Lightsquid, run these from the shell:

ln -s /usr/pbi/lightsquid-amd64/local/www/lightsquid /usr/local/www/lightsquid
ln -s /usr/pbi/lightsquid-amd64/local/etc/lightsquid /usr/local/etc/lightsquid
pkg install perl5
pkg install p5-gd
/usr/bin/perl /usr/pbi/lightsquid-amd64/www/lightsquid/lightparser.pl today

This assumes x64. For i386, replace 'lightsquid-amd64' with 'lightsquid-i386' (I think).

ditrone

@KOM:

To fix Lightsquid, run these from the shell:
ln -s /usr/pbi/lightsquid-amd64/local/www/lightsquid /usr/local/www/lightsquid
ln -s /usr/pbi/lightsquid-amd64/local/etc/lightsquid /usr/local/etc/lightsquid
pkg install perl5
pkg install p5-gd
/usr/bin/perl /usr/pbi/lightsquid-amd64/www/lightsquid/lightparser.pl today
This assumes x64. For i386, replace 'lightsquid-amd64' with 'lightsquid-i386' (I think).

ssdh'd into box and ran commands. looks like links existed. pkg install went fine, no errors

2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.localdomain]/root: ln -s /usr/pbi/lightsquid-amd64/local/www/lightsquid /usr/local/www/lightsquid
ln: /usr/local/www/lightsquid/lightsquid: File exists
[2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.localdomain]/root: ln -s /usr/pbi/lightsquid-amd64/local/etc/lightsquid /usr/local/etc/lightsquid
ln: /usr/local/etc/lightsquid/lightsquid: File exists

then when i run the update i get

[2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.localdomain]/root: /usr/bin/perl /usr/pbi/lightsquid-amd64/www/lightsquid/lightparser.pl today
Can't locate /usr/local/etc/lightsquid/lightsquid.cfg in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/mach/5.18 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.18/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.18 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.18 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.18/mach . /usr/pbi/lightsquid-amd64/www/lightsquid/) at /usr/pbi/lightsquid-amd64/www/lightsquid/lightparser.pl line 35.

Rickinfl

@marcelloc:

What 2.2 version? amd64, i386,nano?

I'm running pfSense 2.2 amd64. Not the nano version.

Rickinfl

This is NOT a pfSense issue. pfSense runs perfect. Someone needs to get a hold of the Squid development team and have them fix this. Or are they on here? Has anyone notified them?

KOM

Weird. I've installed 2.2 fresh about a dozen times and the steps I listed for Lightsquid worked every time without exception. You say you tried on a fresh install and the symlinks were already there??

Someone needs to get a hold of the Squid development team and have them fix this.

Some of the pfSense packages are/were maintained by volunteers. Lightsquid and Sarg are still two packages that have install issues and need to be tweaked to work. The vnstat2 packages was just fixed for 2.2 today, for example.

doktornotor

People should stop producing shitty symlink "fixes" on their boxes. Very much convinced at least half the of package "bugs" are a result of tons of similar hacks done by users that have since totally lost track of what they've actually done on their machines.

Cino

@doktornotor:

People should stop producing shitty symlink "fixes" on their boxes. Very much convinced at least half the of package "bugs" are a result of tons of similar hacks done by users that have since totally lost track of what they've actually done on their machines.

They should keep track of those kind of changes.

bug report for lightsquid was submitted awhile ago https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4198 to fix the pbi's.

djzort

here is the code change, i even commented on it.

https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-packages/commit/6a6669a0919681284c05185246fc39de8dc06811

Cino

its the lightsquid package that needs to be fix, not the squid package.

Rickinfl

Yes it seems Squid is working fine. I tired both Squid and Squid3 both worked on Squid3 had to do some config tweaks, but it worked..

It's SquidGuard that is not working. I've tried everything to get this to work.

Cino

with squid3 install, install squidguard-dev and run this


ln -s /usr/pbi/squidguard-devel-amd64/local/lib/libldap-2.4.so.8 /usr/local/lib/libldap-2.4.so.8
ln -s /usr/pbi/squidguard-devel-amd64/local/lib/libldap-2.4.so.8 /lib/libldap-2.4.so.8
ln -s /usr/pbi/squidguard-devel-amd64/local/lib/libdb-4.6.so.0 /usr/local/lib/libdb-4.6.so.0
ln -s /usr/pbi/squidguard-devel-amd64/local/lib/libdb-4.6.so.0 /usr/lib/libdb-4.6.so.0

after that, make sure you download a blacklist and apply it.

Rickinfl

I've seen that before, but my question is…. If they ever do get around fixing SquidGuard will there be issues because of those LN's?

Cino

There is always a risk… I've been keeping notes of what I've done to my box; so when SG if fix, I can remove the links I created.

KOM

SquidGuard used to work fine for me. Now it's broken and won't work without symlink hacks?

phil.davis

@KOM:

SquidGuard used to work fine for me. Now it's broken and won't work without symlink hacks?

JimP just committed some changes to SquidGuard for pfSense 2.2 : https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-packages/commit/1b27c346293d8a53a80dd7563d787e9e073f801a

It would be worth reinstalling and trying…

marcelloc

Pbi for i386 has updates too.

Cino

I removed the symlinks I had for squidguard-dev and was was able to install squidGuard for the most part with no issues… Had to reboot and also reinstall dansguardian since that wouldnt auto start on reboot...