Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Some websites not responding

    General pfSense Questions
    6
    18
    3.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      ethit
      last edited by

      I can absolutely start from scratch and will give it a go.

      One question though, If those IPs work when bypassing pfSense (phsically removing pfSense from the network), wouldn't that rule out a DNS issue?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kejianshi
        last edited by

        No - It just means you probably configured pfsense DNS badly.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          ethit
          last edited by

          Gotcha. I'll start from scratch and will report back this afternoon. Thanks for the help!

          e

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E
            ethit
            last edited by

            I'm once again stumped. I've reinstalled pfSense probably half a dozen times now trying to get this to work. At this point, I'm down to Craigslist not working, and only on some machines. I have a Vista laptop that can access Craigslist when it's behind pfSense, and a Win 7 desktop that can't, both using the latest Chrome.

            Kejianshi, I took your advice and only configured the most basic version of pfSense that I could. I installed pfSense, setup the WAN and LAN, setup the bridging and that was it. Everything else (including DNS) was left at the default.

            I did find that if I disable packet filtering I'm able to get to CL, but I don't think that's surprising.

            Are there any logs I could look at to find out where the traffic is going? I've tried running wireshark, but all it tells me is that I'm sending SYN packets, but never getting any ACK. Is there any way to trace traffic within pfSense to find out what's going on?

            Thanks,

            e

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              ethit
              last edited by

              I ran a packet capture on the WAN and LAN interfaces. On the WAN I can see the SYN and ACK packets flowing as I would expect. On the LAN side, the ACKs never make it there. So, there is some sort of disconnect between the WAN and the LAN. I don't see anything in any of the logs.

              There's got to be a way to trace the traffic, I just don't know what it is.

              e

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • KOMK
                KOM
                last edited by

                WAN/LAN connectivity is usually an all-or-nothing deal.  I can't even fathom how the firewall would decide to selectively break some websites, but only on some of your clients.  No caching involved such as Squid?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  ethit
                  last edited by

                  No squid, no packages installed at all. Just the base system configured with bridging, that's it.

                  It seems really bizarre to me as well. I can only think that there must be something specific to that traffic that is causing some sort of failure, but I can't figure out how to track it down.

                  e

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • KOMK
                    KOM
                    last edited by

                    I'd start at the back end.  You have clients that consistently fail to render a site that is fine in other clients?  What is different between these clients?  What's different between sites that always works and problem sites (eg HTTPS)?  Are you allowing IP6?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by

                      um if your trying to use pfsense as transparent bridge firewall.  Then there really wouldn't be a wan would there?  It would be a bridge interface..  pfsense would not be the dns server normally in such a setup, etc.  And by default I don't even think it firewalls traffic over a bridge.  Don't you have to that?

                      What guide did you follow to setup this sort of setup?

                      What if you just let pfsense do its thing and route and nat the connection?

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kejianshi
                        last edited by

                        haha - So we are now finding out pfsense is in some bizarre configuration?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          ethit
                          last edited by

                          johnpoz,

                          Looks like you found me the magic bullet. In the guide I used for the bridging setup, it did have me turn on filtering on the bridge interface (net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge=1). I had assumed that was required for bridging, but apparently not. I've set that back to default, the bridging still works and I am still able to set firewall rules and limiters, etc. Craigslist is also now responding. I think that's got this problem solved. Now to find new, more exciting problems.

                          Kejianshi, I did mention in my first post that I was using a bridged setup.  :)

                          Kejianshi, KOM and johnpoz, thank you all so much for your help. This is a great community and I'm glad I found my way here.

                          e

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                            last edited by

                            Without even looking at the guide - can tell you its dated, link says 2.0.1, your on 2.2 are you not?  Shitload of changes since 2.0

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • E
                              ethit
                              last edited by

                              Yeah, I am on 2.2. I searched, but I didn't find any newer guides. Everything I found on setting up bridging was 2.0 or older. Is there a newer, better way of doing bridging?

                              e

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                bob76535
                                last edited by

                                Paul,

                                Did you ever find a resolution for this issue? We just deployed a brand new pfsense firewall (2.2.1) this morning and we have the exact same issue.

                                All API calls fail form servers behind the firewall. Its a transparent bridge setup with all public IPs (no NAT no DHCP).

                                Thanks

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • dennypageD
                                  dennypage
                                  last edited by

                                  Call this a shot in the dark…

                                  I had a great deal of problem with a handful of sites after I upgraded from 2.1.5 to the 2.2 beta. My problem turned out to be excessive & unexplained IP fragmentation occurring somewhere between the remote site and the firewall. For some reason, 2.1.5 had no problem with this, but in 2.2 did. Setting the "Clear Invalid DF bits" did not address the problem.

                                  In the end, what fixed my issue was to clamp the media segment size to 1400 on the WAN interface. You might give clamping a try and see if it has any effect.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B
                                    bob76535
                                    last edited by

                                    Just tried that. It did not work.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.