Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Infiniband cards with pfSense 2.2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    23 Posts 5 Posters 6.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • W
      Wordo
      last edited by

      Ok, compiled the modules and now it's recognozied by pfSense and I can create an Interface on mlxen0! :)

      Howto and ready-to-go modules are here:

      http://www.routerperformance.net/howtos/compile-infiniband-modules-for-pfsense-2-2/

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        What sort of performance are you seeing?

        It's likely the drivers will continue to function across a minor kernel change but by no means guaranteed. Also something outside the kernel might break their operation in some way. I built some very mildly modified drivers for FreeBSD 8.1 and they continued (surprisingly) to function in 8.3. Of course I might have just been lucky.  ;)

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          Wordo
          last edited by

          @mir:

          Your chances of success will greatly improve with X2 cards and older. X3 cards can be tricky even on Linux and Windows because you need a fairly new kernel and drivers supplied by Mellanox.

          Just for the archive, tested a X2 card but with the default install the card was not detected.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • W
            Wordo
            last edited by

            @stephenw10:

            What sort of performance are you seeing?

            It's likely the drivers will continue to function across a minor kernel change but by no means guaranteed. Also something outside the kernel might break their operation in some way. I built some very mildly modified drivers for FreeBSD 8.1 and they continued (surprisingly) to function in 8.3. Of course I might have just been lucky.  ;)

            Steve

            I'm a bit stuck here.
            Created OPT1 on both sides with mlxen0. IPs were 10.99.0.10 and 11. I can ping each other and everything is accepted by firewall.
            But when I want to connect with TCP and don't get any answer. Also tried with pfctl -d and lowering MSS or set hight MTU :( Same with UDP when i try with iperf.

            Any ideas?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              mir
              last edited by

              Do you run a subnet manager either in software or in hardware (switch)?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • W
                Wordo
                last edited by

                No, they are direct attached, no opensm.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  mir
                  last edited by

                  Even if you directly attach you will still need a subnet manager. Without subnet manager you will have no route. https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/understanding-the-infiniband-subnet-manager

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • W
                    Wordo
                    last edited by

                    Hmpf .. isn't there a package for FreeBSD or will I have to compile by myself? Thought that direct attach doesn't need opensm

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      mir
                      last edited by

                      did you not build ofed?
                      http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-infiniband/2013-February/000028.html

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Indeed is it not part of ofed?

                        Looks useful: http://really.zonky.org/?p=2927

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • W
                          Wordo
                          last edited by

                          Sorry, my (foolish) fault :D Just compiled the Mellanox FreeBSD drivers.
                          Ok, I followed http://really.zonky.org/?p=2927 and made the world on my FreeBSD 10.1 build system.
                          Then I packed:

                          a usr/bin/opensm
                          a usr/bin/ibaddr
                          a usr/bin/ibnetdiscover
                          a usr/bin/ibping
                          a usr/bin/ibportstate
                          a usr/bin/ibroute
                          a usr/bin/ibsendtrap
                          a usr/bin/ibstat
                          a usr/bin/ibsysstat
                          a usr/bin/ibtracert
                          a usr/lib/libibcm.a
                          a usr/lib/libibcm.so
                          a usr/lib/libibcm.so.1
                          a usr/lib/libibcm_p.a
                          a usr/lib/libibcommon.a
                          a usr/lib/libibcommon.so
                          a usr/lib/libibcommon.so.1
                          a usr/lib/libibcommon_p.a
                          a usr/lib/libibmad.a
                          a usr/lib/libibmad.so
                          a usr/lib/libibmad.so.1
                          a usr/lib/libibmad_p.a
                          a usr/lib/libibsdp.a
                          a usr/lib/libibsdp.so
                          a usr/lib/libibsdp.so.1
                          a usr/lib/libibsdp_p.a
                          a usr/lib/libibumad.a
                          a usr/lib/libibumad.so
                          a usr/lib/libibumad.so.1
                          a usr/lib/libibumad_p.a
                          a usr/lib/libibverbs.a
                          a usr/lib/libibverbs.so
                          a usr/lib/libibverbs.so.1
                          a usr/lib/libibverbs_p.a
                          a usr/lib/libopensm.a
                          a usr/lib/libopensm.so
                          a usr/lib/libopensm.so.1
                          a usr/lib/libopensm_p.a
                          a usr/lib/libosmcomp.a
                          a usr/lib/libosmcomp.so
                          a usr/lib/libosmcomp.so.1
                          a usr/lib/libosmcomp_p.a
                          a usr/lib/libosmvendor.a
                          a usr/lib/libosmvendor.so
                          a usr/lib/libosmvendor.so.1
                          a usr/lib/libosmvendor_p.a

                          extracted on my pfSense and started opensm. But now I get:

                          Feb 13 08:43:25 443034 [2006400] 0x80 -> OpenSM 3.3.1
                          Entering DISCOVERING state

                          Feb 13 08:43:25 443142 [2006400] 0x02 -> osm_vendor_init: 1000 pending umads specified
                          Feb 13 08:43:25 443215 [2006400] 0x80 -> Entering DISCOVERING state
                          Feb 13 08:43:25 443238 [2006400] 0x02 -> osm_vendor_bind: Binding to port 0xf65214fffe63a411
                          Feb 13 08:43:25 445759 [2006400] 0x01 -> osm_vendor_bind: ERR 5426: Unable to register class 129 version 1
                          Feb 13 08:43:25 445765 [2006400] 0x01 -> osm_sm_mad_ctrl_bind: ERR 3118: Vendor specific bind failed
                          Feb 13 08:43:25 445768 [2006400] 0x01 -> osm_sm_bind: ERR 2E10: SM MAD Controller bind failed (IB_ERROR)

                          Error from osm_opensm_bind (0x2A)
                          Perhaps another instance of OpenSM is already running
                          Feb 13 08:43:25 445776 [2006400] 0x01 -> osm_sa_mad_ctrl_unbind: ERR 1A11: No previous bind
                          Exiting SM

                          There's a post around for missing files:

                          https://community.mellanox.com/thread/1364

                          Anyone know what files were missing (see list above)?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            mir
                            last edited by

                            Have you followed this: https://wiki.freebsd.org/InfiniBand

                            You might find some tips and tricks here: http://web.mit.edu/freebsd/head/contrib/ofed/management/

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              mir
                              last edited by

                              btw. you have asserted that ps -ef |grep opensm gives zero hits?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • W
                                Wordo
                                last edited by

                                No hits, yes.

                                I've followed this http://really.zonky.org/?p=2927

                                Compared to the wiki I did not add to MYKERNEL:
                                options        SDP 
                                device        mthca

                                Is this really essential?

                                Wondering if I could download the OFED stuff from the link you posted and compile it to a prefix like /usr/local/ofed/ and copy the stuff to pfSense? (like on Linux)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • R
                                  RobertFontaine
                                  last edited by

                                  … Thread Resurrection...

                                  I'm building a home lab and looking at QDR infiniband within my rack and ethernet coming in from the outside (wan/lan)

                                  I have the occassional need for very high bandwidth between my storage and my compute nodes.

                                  Am I correct in understanding that pfSense can be compiled with IP over IB and can include a subnet manager?
                                  Can pfSense concurrently route RDMA and IP over IB?  Does this question even make sense?

                                  Would I be better off with a point to point connection between my storage node(s)/san and my compute nodes and/or adding a 4036 (4036E has a 10gb ethernet and subnet manager onboard but I'm poor) switch and effectively running both gigabit ethernet for ip traffic and QDR infiniband for NFS over RDMA?

                                  Thanks,
                                  Robert.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    Guest
                                    last edited by

                                    Hello,

                                    in normal Infiniband is used to build separate SAN networks that are connected over Infiniband NICs
                                    that are attached to Infiniband switches to deliver around ~10 GBit/s or 40 GBit/s or 56 GBit/s or
                                    attached directly from card to card. And this extra or separate network will be then connected to
                                    the rest entire network over 10 or 40 GBit/s in usual. So why pfSense as a firewall should be
                                    invited in this game? And why for so much money? A normal Mellanox SRx3 VPI card is able
                                    to get for the cost of ~1300 € (dual Port NIC) and a switch for around ~6500 € and then this
                                    construct will be able to delivers 56 GBit/s at each port! But there is no need of the firewall or
                                    a separate router that is doing anything in this "game".

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R
                                      RobertFontaine
                                      last edited by

                                      @BlueKobold:

                                      Hello,

                                      in normal Infiniband is used to build separate SAN networks that are connected over Infiniband NICs
                                      that are attached to Infiniband switches to deliver around ~10 GBit/s or 40 GBit/s or 56 GBit/s or
                                      attached directly from card to card. And this extra or separate network will be then connected to
                                      the rest entire network over 10 or 40 GBit/s in usual. So why pfSense as a firewall should be
                                      invited in this game? And why for so much money? A normal Mellanox SRx3 VPI card is able
                                      to get for the cost of ~1300 € (dual Port NIC) and a switch for around ~6500 € and then this
                                      construct will be able to delivers 56 GBit/s at each port! But there is no need of the firewall or
                                      a separate router that is doing anything in this "game".

                                      I am building a small compute network (single rack) 
                                      Kvm/Centos / dual  xeon  / 4 xeon phi -    compute nodes
                                      Kvm/Solaris / zfs  mirrored / striped ssds -  data server (San -  napp-it)

                                      Remote VPN
                                      Development VMs
                                      LAMP,  misc servers smtp, ftp, etc…

                                      Qdr infiniband -  cheap,  high bandwidth,  low latency
                                      Ib/nfs/rdma

                                      If pfsense can support ipoib and bridge wan to lan
                                      then I don't have to buy a bridging switch in the short term.  I  will likely vm pfsense as well.

                                      A Voltaire 4036 is relatively  inexpensive.

                                      This is being done as a home basement  project,  low budget,  incremental build out....  Data mining,  machine learning,  parallel programming,  networking lab/sandbox, kaggle contests

                                      Matlab,  pysci,  R, OpenMP,  openacc,  c++,  Fortran,  etc.

                                      a few remote developers,  analysts,  VPN / ssh.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.