Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Unable to communicate with https://packages.pfsense.org.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
    28 Posts 5 Posters 5.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      ferthelet
      last edited by

      no answer yet? could you further investigate this or already solved it? I have this same problem and currently using v2.2 …

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Is it able to check for updates at the dashboard?

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F
          ferthelet
          last edited by

          In my case, yes, it seems to communicate and confirm that I'm on the latest version…

          ![Captura de pantalla - 110215 - 09:12:51.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Captura de pantalla - 110215 - 09:12:51.png)
          ![Captura de pantalla - 110215 - 09:12:51.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Captura de pantalla - 110215 - 09:12:51.png_thumb)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Have you ever used a custom package repository?
            Try fetching the package list directly from the command line:

            [2.2-RELEASE][root@pfSense.localdomain]/root: fetch -o /dev/null https://www.pfsense.org/packages/pkg_config.10.xml
            /dev/null                                     100% of   73 kB  313 kBps 00m00s
            
            

            Also are you using the DNS forwarder or resolver? You don't have localhost as one of your listed dns servers.

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F
              ferthelet
              last edited by

              Hi, I've noticed that ping6 directly to the ipv6 number couldn't reach even my GW (this is accesible from any ping from the web without any problems).

              About the DNS I have it as a forwarder not as a resolver (please see attached img)

              I could successfully fetch from the command line (also attached to te image)

              ![Captura de pantalla - 120215 - 16:55:46.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Captura de pantalla - 120215 - 16:55:46.png)
              ![Captura de pantalla - 120215 - 16:55:46.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Captura de pantalla - 120215 - 16:55:46.png_thumb)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                If you have a broken v6 connection try this:
                https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Controlling_IPv6_or_IPv4_Preference

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  kejianshi
                  last edited by

                  You might consider entering a IPV6 DNS server at the bottom of the list of DNS servers…

                  Or disabling IPV6 altogether if you just don't quite understand it?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • F
                    ferthelet
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10, that solved the error contacting http://packages.pfsense.org, now I have a working list :-)

                    @kejianshi, as it fails pinging6 from the pfsense server to the default external GW using the ipv6 address directly, no DNS can be contacted either.

                    (*) ipv6 was configured-uncofngured here by a long-gone sysadmin who made some strange things here.

                    I too think that disabling ipv6 completely could have resolved this quickly but I really would like to have this ipv6 working, it would be really helpful if anyone knows a good document to start the config over.

                    Thank you very much again!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      kejianshi
                      last edited by

                      You want IPV6 working?  we can do that too…

                      IPV6 seems easier to me than IPV4 - Maybe I'm strange.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Yeah, you're strange.  ;)

                        Impossible to really give you much advise without knowing a lot more about your network but a good place to start would be here:
                        https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Example_basic_configuration

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kejianshi
                          last edited by

                          Its as easy as IPV4 and no NAT issues.  Sure its base 16 but I have 8 fingers on each hand, so no problem.  (-;

                          I love that I can easily give anything I want a public IP and easily firewall it.

                          For Audio/Video this will be great as soon as people accept it.

                          My biggest issue is that most things are IPV6 ready but not really being skinned in most GUIs yet.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F
                            ferthelet
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10, thank you again but that seems pretty general, one thing in my network is that we don't have DMZ :-)

                            @kejianshi, great you find it v6 easier than v4, I'm still grasping it

                            I want to install squid (or squid3?) + squidgauard (or dansguard?) and I'm reading that these packages have problems with ipv6, is this right?

                            A little context if you could use it for some advice…

                            Our public ipv6 addresses are

                            
                            network 2800:160:17C5:0:0:0:0:0/48
                            GW 2800:160:17C5:0:0:0:0:1
                            
                            

                            My pfsense server info

                            2.2-RELEASE (amd64) 
                            built on Thu Jan 22 14:03:54 CST 2015 
                            FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p4
                            You are on the latest version.
                            

                            This server has 3 network i/f and 3 vlans

                            cablenic WAN	 up	100baseTX <full-duplex> 190.8.65.21 2800:160:17c5::2
                             cablenic intsi	         up	1000baseT <full-duplex> 192.168.32.253
                             cablenic intsm	         up	1000baseT <full-duplex> 192.168.18.245
                             cablenic VLANCER up	1000baseT <full-duplex> 172.28.255.254 2800:160:17c5::1:1 (here are 50% of network PCs)
                             cablenic VLANTI	 up	1000baseT <full-duplex> 192.168.168.1
                             cablenic VLANSEM up	1000baseT <full-duplex> 192.168.14.254 (here are 50% of network PCs)</full-duplex></full-duplex></full-duplex></full-duplex></full-duplex></full-duplex>
                            

                            Thank you again!!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              The best piece of advise I can give you is to start with a basic configuration and build it up testing at each stage. Don't try and do everything in one go.

                              @ kejianshi: Hexadecimal limbs, why didn't I think of that.  ;)

                              Steve

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • johnpozJ
                                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                last edited by

                                So what IPv6 are you using on the lan side if that is your public?

                                inetnum:    2800:160::/32
                                status:      allocated
                                aut-num:    N/A
                                owner:      Gtd Internet S.A.
                                ownerid:    CL-GISA-LACNIC
                                responsible: Manuel Suanez Berrios
                                address:    Moneda, 920, Piso 11
                                address:    6500712 - Santiago - RM
                                country:    CL

                                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • F
                                  ferthelet
                                  last edited by

                                  @johnpoz, I had this previous config which might have changed as I was playing around…

                                  VLANCER, 2800:160:17c5::1:1 /52
                                  VLANSEM, 2800:160:17c5::1:2 /52 and so on...
                                  

                                  @stephenw10, you are correct, step-by-step, the only thing I want by now is to establish connection from my pfsense server to  my default public GW first then to the world using ipv6 address –no DNS at first :-)

                                  Our DNS servers would be

                                  2800:160::2
                                  2800:160::1
                                  

                                  Thanks for your kind replies!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • johnpozJ
                                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                    last edited by

                                    /52 ??  yeah that would not be correct..

                                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • K
                                      kejianshi
                                      last edited by

                                      Sleeping - Look at this when I wake.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • F
                                        ferthelet
                                        last edited by

                                        @johnpoz /52 is not correct? I thought it could be subdivided in 16 networks with this… any suggestion?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • johnpozJ
                                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                          last edited by

                                          min size of ipv6 segment is suppose to be /64, you can get a /48 for example from say tunnel broker HE, they route that to you via your tunnel then you can break that up into as many /64 you want.

                                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stephenw10S
                                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                            last edited by

                                            But those VLANs have the same subnet, no?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.