Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SLAAC radvd problem in 2.2-RELEASE

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    12 Posts 5 Posters 2.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      doktornotor Banned
      last edited by

      Absolutely no such issue here. 10 or so boxes with IPv6. You must be special. Sounds like a broken configuration to me.  :P

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        KarlZ
        last edited by

        I see the same issue on 2.2
        tcmpdump shows RS arriving from the client but no reply and no RA. Logs shows the same permission denied.
        radvd is runnign and the .conf looks sane.
        All ICMP6 is allowed in the rules.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          maverick_slo
          last edited by

          HA!

          I have 3 internal VLANs working with IPv6 and now I upgraded to 2.2 and added 4th VLAN.
          I configured IPv6 on it (and yes, it is NOT configuration issue, and yes, it is NOT firewall ICPM or whatever issue) and it`s not working.
          radvd.conf is exactly the same as for other VLANs, just different subnets.

          Will try to reboot the box.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            maverick_slo
            last edited by

            OK you used /50 subnet.
            I used /64 subnet and have exactly the same issue ( for others, see redmine ticked, OP updated it).

            EDIT:

            Unrelated, sorry my mistake.
            I had captive portal enabled and apparently ipv6 doest`t like captive portal…
            I disabled it and here we go all is fine.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              KarlZ
              last edited by

              Yes I see thi snow. Disabling captive portal lets IPv6 work. You can either have captive portal or IPv6 not both. :-\

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                doktornotor Banned
                last edited by

                Uhm…

                1/ CP does not support IPv6 at all.
                2/ You should NEVER use captive portal on your LAN. Set up dedicated interfaces for any CPs.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  maverick_slo
                  last edited by

                  Now you smarta** ing around :)

                  1. You could post sooner you know
                  2. Yes I have 4 vlans one of them is dedicated to CP

                  After war it`s easy to be gneral :)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    doktornotor Banned
                    last edited by

                    Perhaps IPv6 should be made no-op somehow visibly in the GUI once you enable CP on an interface.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      kejianshi
                      last edited by

                      My IPV6 also isn't broken.

                      I somehow keep managing to brute force and ignorance my way through things without issue on pfsense.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        maverick_slo
                        last edited by

                        @kejianshi:

                        My IPV6 also isn't broken.

                        I somehow keep managing to brute force and ignorance my way through things without issue on pfsense.

                        Yeah that would be great.
                        Or maybe captive portal code rewrite to support ipv6 ? :) hehe
                        I know its a lot of work. Its in the redmine and targeted version is future :S

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kejianshi
                          last edited by

                          I think IPV6 is ready for the world and am baffled as to why it hasn't replace IPV4 already.

                          So, yeah - I agree.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.