Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    VLAN layer 2 or 3 switch?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    16 Posts 9 Posters 4.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      ei3000
      last edited by

      Ok

      So the layer 2 switch will just stop working until pfSense is up and running again?

      Thanks

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        maverick_slo
        last edited by

        there will be no network connectivity between vlans but switch will work normally.
        clients in the same VLAN will still be able to communicate between no matter if pfsense in working or not.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          phil.davis
          last edited by

          The layer 2 switch will keep working for the various VLANs it has - e.g. if port 2,3,4 are in VLAN42 then devices on port 2,3,4 will keep talking to each other. So you lose no functionality of each (V)LAN itself.
          Routing and firewalling between VLANs (and to the internet, of course) stops - obviously there is no pfSense to do that.
          The VLANs effectively have a "block all" firewall between them, because that is what a layer 2 VLAN switch is - it isolates traffic in separate broadcast domains (VLANs). So there is no breach of security - if anything the security gets tighter/better ;)

          As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
          If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kejianshi
            last edited by

            I personally have no need for a layer 3 switch and layer 2 is easy and not a problem if pfsense is down.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              mikeisfly
              last edited by

              If you have the option to get a layer 3 switch over a layer 2, I personally would choose the layer 3 switch. Think about it, all thing being equal the layer 3 switch can do more. You don't have to have it working in layer 3 if you want PfSense to do the routing across vlans, but later on if you want that capability then you have it. You never said if this was for home or work, but in a home environment could be good for lab purposes as well. Other than that I ditto what everyone said.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jahonixJ
                jahonix
                last edited by

                Since Cisco SG300 Gb switches have become ridiculously cheap it's more a question of which mode to configure them than to decide buying L2 or L3.
                Personally I haven't been a friend of Cisco switches until I was forced to use them in an install 2 years ago. Haven't looked back since…

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  kejianshi
                  last edited by

                  10x more expensive than what I'd budget for home.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jahonixJ
                    jahonix
                    last edited by

                    Was it mentioned already if it is for a home or commercial install?

                    Other than that I use Cisco (and TP-Link) switches extensively in my house now. As a student an el-cheapo switch was sufficient but I moved out of my tent many moons ago. Always depends.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      kejianshi
                      last edited by

                      I'm still in my tent - Will probably die in my tent.  Kids will do that.  haha.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • H
                        Harvy66
                        last edited by

                        Cisco SG300 Gb is $550 from NewEgg right now. I purchase my HP1810-24g(26 ports total) for only $220. I wouldn't spend 150% extra for layer 3, especially since most inter-vlan communications should be filtered in my case.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                          last edited by

                          What what are you looking at of the sg300 that is 550$

                          The 10 porter is $168
                          http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA1EA1YB6736&cm_re=sg300--33-150-087--Product

                          I see a 28 port POE version for 563$

                          Where is this going to be used?  Home or business?  I got a sg300-10 a while back for home use, and it ROCKS!!  Can not beat the price - I don't use it for layer 3, but its nice to know its there if do need it.  Pfsense is my layer 3

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jahonixJ
                            jahonix
                            last edited by

                            @Harvy66:

                            … HP1810-24g ...

                            You can't really compare that to a Cisco SG300.
                            The HP neither has a CLI for management (web only) nor a serial console. That's fine for initial setup and probably some VLANs but that's about it.
                            And this does not account for all the other features and benefits.

                            Recently we had to track down an IGMP issue with Cisco Catalyst 2960 switches (made a runner limp every 5s on IP-TV). Turned out to be the switch's firmware. You don't have the necessary tools from a web-gui for such an analysis.

                            That said, part of my office still runs a rather old HP 1800-24g just fine but it's years old already. And that's only basic office switching, nothing fancy.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              jgraham5481
                              last edited by

                              @ei3000:

                              Hello

                              What will happen if I use layer 2 switch for VLAN`s and pfSense as router and pfSense goes down, will there be any security issues?
                              Is it better for security to use layer 3 switch if pfSense goes down?

                              Thanks

                              If this was your only concern, why not build a second firewall, for fail over? It's pretty easy, and in 2.2 you don't necessarily need 3 WAN IP's to make it work right.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • E
                                ei3000
                                last edited by

                                Hello

                                Thanks to all of you.

                                I will think about what soulution I go for.

                                Thanks

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.