Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Difference strongSwan U5.2.2/K10.1-STABLE vs U5.2.2/K10.1-STABLE

    Development
    2
    2
    908
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      dzej
      last edited by

      Hello,
      I'm trying to copy IPSEC configuration from pfsense 2.2-RELEASE to FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE to create working setup with NAT before IPSEC.

      This is working configuration on pfsense:
              rightsubnet = 10.0.0.0/8,10.13.37.10/24
              leftsubnet = 192.168.102.0/24,192.168.208.1|192.168.217.0/24

      But on FreeBSD I get this message:
      "invalid subnet: 192.168.208.1|192.168.217.0/24, skipped"

      So the question is: was patch applied on pfsense strongswan to make "|" works in leftsubnet?

      VERSIONS:
      pfsense:
      FreeBSD strongSwan U5.2.1/K10.1-RELEASE-p4

      freebsd:
      FreeBSD strongSwan U5.2.2/K10.1-STABLE

      Kind regards,

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E
        eri--
        last edited by

        Access the tools repo and see yourself.
        Unless you use pfSense port it will not work.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.