Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Cannot resolve Front End firewall hostname

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    26 Posts 4 Posters 3.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      kevindd992002
      last edited by

      @johnpoz:

      Well I wouldn't want stuff in dmz going to my AD dns..  So you would have to use some other dns for them.. Why would stuff in your dmz need to resolve your internall stuff?

      The only DMZ server that needs to resolve the an internal server (Hub Transport) is the Edge Transport, that's how Exchange works as you may have known.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by

        well then punch a pinhole in your dmz and have it query your AD dns.

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kevindd992002
          last edited by

          Now, there's another weird thing that's going on with my DNS. There's nothing wrong with the setup in the dropbox picture I've posted here. Computers in the testlab LAN, when used with nslookup can properly resolve, say, www.google.com.

          On my other pfsense box, in another home, when I do nslookup on one of the computers in its LAN it appends the connection-specifc DNS suffix that its LAN connection has. Of course, if the computer gets its DHCP assignment from pfsense, pfsense will assign a connection-specific DNS suffix to it. So let's say, I do "nslookup www.google.com" it returns the result for www.google.com.domain.com, domain.com being my domain. I know that that happens when the address you query is unqualified. So if I query the complete FQDN with the "." in the end, "nslookup www.google.com.", then it gives me a good result. I thought there was nothing wrong with this but why is it not giving me the same behavior as the one above? Take note, the computers in the testlab LAN in the situation above is not in any domain and so they have the exact same setup as the situation in this paragraph.

          What gives?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            phil.davis
            last edited by

            I don't know what gives, but all my Windows clients have this behavior. I can:

            ping www.google.com
            

            And underneath the ping resolves an IP address for a real public www.google.com - somehow ordinary programs that want name resolution do it OK.

            But if I

            nslookup www.google.com
            

            Somehow nslookup always sticks on the domain name suffix/es and tries for www.google.com.mycompany.example.com.
            So in nslookup I always put the root domain dot at the end:

            nslookup www.google.com.
            

            A quick search found this Microsoft article on how their nslookup works: nslookup www.google.com

            Nslookup will always devolve the name from the current context. If you fail to fully qualify a name query (that is, use trailing dot), the query will be appended to the current context. For example, the current DNS settings are att.com and a query is performed on www.microsoft.com; the first query will go out as www.microsoft.com.att.com because of the query being unqualified. This behavior may be inconsistent with other vendor's versions of Nslookup, and this article is presented to clarify the behavior of Microsoft Windows NT Nslookup.exe

            As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
            If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kevindd992002
              last edited by

              @phil.davis:

              I don't know what gives, but all my Windows clients have this behavior. I can:

              ping www.google.com
              

              And underneath the ping resolves an IP address for a real public www.google.com - somehow ordinary programs that want name resolution do it OK.

              But if I

              nslookup www.google.com
              

              Somehow nslookup always sticks on the domain name suffix/es and tries for www.google.com.mycompany.example.com.
              So in nslookup I always put the root domain dot at the end:

              nslookup www.google.com.
              

              A quick search found this Microsoft article on how their nslookup works: nslookup www.google.com

              Nslookup will always devolve the name from the current context. If you fail to fully qualify a name query (that is, use trailing dot), the query will be appended to the current context. For example, the current DNS settings are att.com and a query is performed on www.microsoft.com; the first query will go out as www.microsoft.com.att.com because of the query being unqualified. This behavior may be inconsistent with other vendor's versions of Nslookup, and this article is presented to clarify the behavior of Microsoft Windows NT Nslookup.exe

              Ping works in every situation as it seems that it does not work the same way as nslookup.

              That's exactly the behavior I notice in the network in my home. I expect it to work that way (it will append the suffix) as what I've read in several websites say the same thing you layed out in your reply.

              This means that my test setup (the network diagram in dropbox) does not work right. Anybody have an idea what's going on here?

              EDIT: Oh and by the way, the cause for this issue is definitely not because of the nslookup version as I've used the same test machine on both networks in question as to avoid component differences.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kevindd992002
                last edited by

                BUMP!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  So if you don't like your machine doing suffix search etc.. change the setup do do the correct order or not do it at all.

                  Still not grasping what you feel is not working?  Again I will say this, members of domain should only point to authoritative dns for the AD domain..  Quite often that is the DC of the domain.. Pointing to pfsense be it running unbound, or dnsmasq, a bind derver, some other forwarder like your soho router, googledns directly is going to cause you grief.

                  Doing such a setup other than pointing to AD dns is for advanced use and need only..

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    kevindd992002
                    last edited by

                    Sorry, I think you were referring to the first question in this thread. My main issue now (in this same thread) starts from reply # 18 and a few posts after that. Can you give that a quick read for me?

                    Thanks.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by

                      Don't be hijacking threads… Create your own.

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kevindd992002
                        last edited by

                        @johnpoz:

                        Don't be hijacking threads… Create your own.

                        This is MY thread and I thought my question is related to DNS, so I posted here. Anyway, I'll just transfer the contents of this thread to a new thread.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.