Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Unable to set Media / Mediaopt for LAGG Members

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    3 Posts 2 Posters 673 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • X Offline
      xwni
      last edited by

      Hi,

      When pfSense  (2.2 & 2.2.1-dev) configures a LAGG interface, neither the webui or the underlying mechanism seem to have any facility to apply settings such as media / duplex on the underlying member interface.

      I think i have a partial workaround below but am missing some information, such as how to reapply the carp/vips to the interface.

      Also, in general I think this should be considered a bug since it is not possile to specify media information for the member interfaces of a lagg.  Maybe those settings shoudl go into the webui under the <lagg0>edit page.

      Am I missing something?  Should I go about implementing my workaround differently?

      Could the lack of media options for a lagg interface be considered and as a bug/new feature request?

      • My Situation *

      In my case, my underlying interfaces are solarflare, sfxge interfaces which I want to have runing at 1000baseSX.

      The config option in the webui at <interfaces>-> NAME -> Speed and Duplex -> Advanced , will only show as 'autodetect' if the interface 'NAME' is supplied by a virtual interface such as lagg0.

      Unfortunately in my case, autodetect with the sfxge seems to assume a 10GbaseSX link and obviously fails to bring the nic up because I'm using 1GE equipment.

      So I need a way to tell pfSense when it is configuring the lagg, to set media as 1000baseSX on the underlying member interfaces.

      • partial workaround *

      I can force this with shellcmd in the config file,  but doing so in this way messes with other settings, removing configuration such as carp and virtual ip's.

      
                      <shellcmd>ifconfig lagg0 destroy</shellcmd>
      		<shellcmd>ifconfig sfxge0 media 1000baseSX mediaopt full-duplex</shellcmd>
      		<shellcmd>ifconfig sfxge1 media 1000baseSX mediaopt full-duplex</shellcmd>
      		<shellcmd>ifconfig lagg0 create</shellcmd>
      		<shellcmd>ifconfig lagg0 laggproto lacp laggport sfxge0 laggport sfxge1 up</shellcmd>
      		<shellcmd>ifconfig lagg0 192.168.8.7 netmask 255.255.255.0</shellcmd>
      
      

      This workaround is incomplete however as I need to add a command replace/regenerate the carp/vip configuration, and anything else i have upset when i did the lagg0 destroy.

      Regards,

      XW</interfaces></lagg0>

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        doktornotor Banned
        last edited by

        Well, you should never ever need to hardcode any of this for Gbit+ interfaces. Suggestion? Fix your broken HW instead.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • X Offline
          xwni
          last edited by

          Yeah, I guess.  I understand your approach.

          Clearly the hardware should be able to detect, and report that it's only working within a 1G infrastructure.

          However in this case I'm stuck with what hardware i've got.  I guess if it comes to it, I'll have to change the software..  Either hack a workaround into pfSense or more likely do something manually with a base operating system.

          Even if I was flexible on hardware, I might still have good reasons to want to run the interface at a particular speed/duplex, depending on my requirement at the time.  Auto detect is not always the right answer.

          …  So I still think this as should be seen as a fault  -  If pfSense is prepared to offer speed/media opt on a base network interface, then it should be smart enough to realise.. that when it is dealing with a lagg virtual if, then it should drill down to the underlying media and offer a speed/duplex combination that is common to all interfaces

          • I'm thinking for this purpose the cable medium doesn't need to be relevant -  for example, baseT, and baseSX ; these could go together as member interfaces, so long as both are set to the same duplex and speed rating.

          XW

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.