• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Port forwading not working

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
3 Posts 2 Posters 2.1k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    berns041671
    last edited by Jul 23, 2007, 7:28 PM

    Hello All,

    here is my setup

    lan –> 192.168.30.1
    wan --> 125.XX.XX.84 (leased line)
    opt1 --> 203.XX.XX.58 (DSL)
    dmz --> 192.168.31.3 (opt2)

    i created CARP VIP's and

    125.XX.XX.83
    125.XX.XX.85
    125.XX.XX.91

    and so on.

    my webserver and smtp server are in DMZ, with an IP of 192.168.31.5 and 192.168.31.91 respectively, i followed the step on port forwarding
    ex.  WAN  TCP  25 (SMTP)  192.168.31.91        25 (SMTP)
                                                    (ext.: 125.XX.XX.91)

    and check the auto add firewall rules for wan interface

    Proto  Source  Port  Destination  Port      Gateway  Schedule  Description 
    TCP   *           * 192.168.31.91 25 (SMTP) *

    but port forwarding seems doesnt work, i  also tried proxy arp and others, but any of them wont solve my problem, can anyone help solving this problem, thanks in advance.

    -Bernie

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • G Offline
      GruensFroeschli
      last edited by Jul 23, 2007, 8:07 PM

      do you want to 1:1 NAT or just normal NAT?

      We do what we must, because we can.

      Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B Offline
        berns041671
        last edited by Jul 23, 2007, 8:57 PM

        @GruensFroeschli:

        do you want to 1:1 NAT or just normal NAT?

        normal NAT or if possible 1:1 NAT, i could try both and see which one will work better, thanks.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        3 out of 3
        • First post
          3/3
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
          This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
          consent.not_received