Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPSec AES256

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
    17 Posts 6 Posters 2.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DerelictD
      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
      last edited by

      You probably have a mismatch.  Check everything.

      The only pulldowns that usually require javascript are the ones that change content when the other item is changed, as is the case with changing the algorithm presenting a specific selection of key lengths.

      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        spot
        last edited by

        I am having the same problem something that started after I updated today.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          spot
          last edited by

          FYI

          I had that set previously

          Kept getting message so blew awase phase II settings and tried again same issue.

          Blew away Phase I and recreated I and II and this is the same message I am getting.

          –--------------------------------------------
          I did export of config to check and it looks correct.

          Might be something in the interface

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by

            What part about Only 128-bit AES can be used with glxsb accelerator is hard to understand?

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              cmb
              last edited by

              @spot:

              I am having the same problem something that started after I updated today.

              You had the problem before you upgraded actually. 2.2.1 enforces a proper configuration there. You have glxsb enabled, which means you cannot use AES > 128. If set to "auto", many times you'll end up using AES > 128 and have a broken VPN. I added that input validation so you can't configure something that's going to break with your glxsb card enabled.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kodimar
                last edited by

                My research has pointed that the NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error is caused by an error in the Phase 2 settings.  Is this a correct assumption?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  spot
                  last edited by

                  Derelict The part where "glxsb" was not in my vocabulary. It is now. I didn't even know it was enabled on this box.

                  When you are right, you are right. This was old box, soon to be replaced by an APU, if they ever make it back into the USA. I did not catch it because we don't use accelerators. This old geode had it.

                  Thank you!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    kodimar
                    last edited by

                    My research has pointed that the NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error is caused by an error in the Phase 2 settings.  Is this a correct assumption?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      cmb
                      last edited by

                      @kodimar:

                      My research has pointed that the NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error is caused by an error in the Phase 2 settings.  Is this a correct assumption?

                      A mismatch of some sort, most likely it's something in P1.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jimpJ
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by

                        @kodimar:

                        My research has pointed that the NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error is caused by an error in the Phase 2 settings.  Is this a correct assumption?

                        It can be either Phase 1 or Phase 2. See https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/IPsec_Troubleshooting for help interpreting the logs.

                        Best thing to do is set IKE SA, IKE Child SA, and Configuration Backend to Diag in the log settings, all others on Control, and have the remote end initiate.

                        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.