Syslog different in 2.2.x vs 2.1.x
-
No, here is an example of what I see in the 2.1.5 syslogs:
Mar 23 12:30:03 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Mar 23 12:30:03 pf: yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy.51658 > 8.8.4.4.53: 26485+ A? mail.acuity.com. (33)
(private addresses replaced)
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx = firewall address (syslog source)
yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy = traffic source as seen and logged by the firewallThese are just hosts on our network querying dns servers, we are not using DNS forwrder or DNS masq. This is just being logged as the traffic passes through the firewall.
-
That was being passed through by accident then, as a part of the pf output. We replaced the old log with a cleaner/more concise and easy-to-parse single-line format.
If you want to log DNS queries, then use one of the methods from the link I pasted earlier.
-
Oh no, that is too bad. That was extremely useful info to get in syslog. So now in order to get that data I need to use either dns forwarder or dnsmasq? Any chance this can be added back in for those of us that don't want to use either of those?
-
It was never intended to be there in the first place, and there are no plans to bring back that old log format.
-
Ok, thanks for your help.
-
so you want to log queries your clients do to say googledns? Your not running any resolver or forwarder on pfsense or anywhere else in your network? I do believe both dnsmasq and unbound have options to log queries. I think dnstap was added to unbound in 1.5.0, so since we just moved to 1.5.3 thought that would be an option?
Guess you could always run dnstop to view dns queries, etc. But you want to log specific IP queries, for troubleshooting or always?
-
Yes, looking to log all dns queries. We are not running any dns services on the pfsense. We are running some bind resolvers, I suppose we could enable query logging on those to get the data. It was just really nice getting the data in the pfsense logs, and hate that they took it away. I want to always log dns queries, it is very useful for event correlation and forensics.
-
If your clients are using your bind servers, why would you not log it there and send it to syslog? Bind has very extensive logging functionality if you want it, etc.
As to pfsense fixing how they were sending syslog - its a good thing!!
-
Yes, that is what we will be doing, using the logging in bind. I agree that the log format needed to be fixed, but I think they could have done it without removing data.
-
The data was never supposed to be there in the first place, it was only there by luck/coincidence the way that pf log output was interpreted by tcpdump. It's data that should never have shown up, but…
