Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Firebox X Core Fan Replacement

    Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
    3
    7
    2.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V
      voultar
      last edited by

      Hey guys,

      The small 3 (I believe 40mm) fans that exhaust air out of the rear chassis of the Firebox are awfully loud. It sounds like my Firewall is about to hit mach 4!

      Can you any of you recommend a more quiet replacement for these? I'm going to do the same thing for my Linksys Gbit switch.

      Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • chpalmerC
        chpalmer
        last edited by

        You can slow those down with a little program by Stephenw10.

        http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,32013.msg270534.html#msg270534

        http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,32013.msg187336.html#msg187336

        Triggering snowflakes one by one..
        Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          The fans on the X-Core box, like Voultar's X700, are non controllable unfortunately.
          You can add some manual fan controllers or just use fixed resistors of suitable value. Those boxes had to be able to run at 100% in a hot rack so if you're not doing that, like most, you can run will less cooling.
          The CPU fan is louder I seem to recall and easier to replace. If your box is not in a stack you can switch it with a regular axial fan cut a hole in the lid. Somewhat extreme I guess.

          There is quite a lot of info in the X700 thread because many people have found the fans to be unacceptably loud.

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • chpalmerC
            chpalmer
            last edited by

            Ah- sorry to get your hopes up!  :P

            Triggering snowflakes one by one..
            Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • V
              voultar
              last edited by

              Thanks guys, I appreciate the input.

              The Firebox will be under relatively low system utilization. It's in my home network, which consists of maybe 4 active nodes at any given time. However, there will be a few services running on the back-end that may want to draw a bit of power.

              I can't remember, but are the Pentium 3 chips equipped with a thermal probe? When I step the fans down, I'd like to the monitor the temp of the core through PFsense.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                There is thermal monitoring available via the superIO chip. You can access that from pfSense via the command line with mbmon.

                You have to install it from the CLI, it's a FreeBSD package. If you're running a full install there's no need to remount the files system so just do:

                [2.0.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.fire.box]/root(6): pkg_add -r ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-8.1-release/Latest/mbmon.tbz
                

                then do:

                [2.0.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.fire.box]/root(7): rehash
                

                this is so the FreeBSD knows where to find the binary.
                Then:

                [2.0.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.fire.box]/root(8): mbmon -I
                
                Temp.= 42.0, 16.5, 54.5; Rot.= 5818, 5625, 5232
                Vcore = 1.15, 2.35; Volt. = 3.36, 5.05, 12.10, -11.96, -0.62
                
                

                Your values will be different from mine since that's from an X-Peak box. Also mbmon lists all the SuperIO chip values even though some are not connected to a sensor. Those will always show wildly wrong!  ;)

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • V
                  voultar
                  last edited by

                  Thanks Steve!!! I really appreciate that.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.