Using a hard-disk in a Watchguard Firebox X750e for cache/log storage
-
Having updated to 2.2 the support for my hard-drive now appears rather worse.
The atacontrol utility which did exactly what I needed has been superseded by camcontrol. This reports that the disk is in polled mode.
$ camcontrol negotiate /dev/ada1 -v Current parameters: (pass1:ata0:0:1:0): ATA mode: PIO4 (pass1:ata0:0:1:0): ATAPI packet length: 0 (pass1:ata0:0:1:0): PIO transaction length: 8192 (pass1:ata0:0:1:0): tagged queueing: disabled ata0: SIM/HBA version: 1 ata0: supports SDTR message ata0: scan bus sequentially ata0: HBA engine count: 0 ata0: maximum target: 1 ata0: maximum LUN: 0 ata0: highest path ID in subsystem: 0 ata0: initiator ID: 0 ata0: SIM vendor: FreeBSD ata0: HBA vendor: ATA ata0: HBA vendor ID: 0x8086 ata0: HBA device ID: 0x266f ata0: HBA subvendor ID: 0x8086 ata0: HBA subdevice ID: 0x266f ata0: bus ID: 0 ata0: base transfer speed: 3.300MB/sec ata0: maximum transfer size: 131072 bytesI should be able to set the disk to UDMA33 mode however, this is what I get.
$ camcontrol negotiate /dev/ada1 -v -U -M UDMA33 -a User parameters: (pass1:ata0:0:1:0): ATA mode: UDMA2 (pass1:ata0:0:1:0): ATAPI packet length: 0 (pass1:ata0:0:1:0): PIO transaction length: 131072 (pass1:ata0:0:1:0): tagged queueing: enabled ata0: SIM/HBA version: 1 ata0: supports SDTR message ata0: scan bus sequentially ata0: HBA engine count: 0 ata0: maximum target: 1 ata0: maximum LUN: 0 ata0: highest path ID in subsystem: 0 ata0: initiator ID: 0 ata0: SIM vendor: FreeBSD ata0: HBA vendor: ATA ata0: HBA vendor ID: 0x8086 ata0: HBA device ID: 0x266f ata0: HBA subvendor ID: 0x8086 ata0: HBA subdevice ID: 0x266f ata0: bus ID: 0 ata0: base transfer speed: 3.300MB/sec ata0: maximum transfer size: 131072 bytes Unit is not ready (pass1:ata0:0:1:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 00 00 00 00 00 00 (pass1:ata0:0:1:0): CAM status: CCB request was invalid Test Unit Ready failedI've tried all manner of variations. Any ideas to get camcontrol to do what a simple
atacontrol mode ad1 UDMA6would do before?
Thanks,
Steve
-
Haven't you alread set ata0 to PIO4 only though?
The HD and CF are on the same IDE channel right? -
Hi Stephen,
This is what I'm trying to get my head round at the moment, reading the FreeBSD documentation to better understand the nomenclature.
If I boot without specifying
hint.ata.0.mode=PIO4I see the following on the console
ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: <sandisk sdcfh-004g="" hdx="" 6.02=""> CFA-0 device ada0: Serial Number ABZ042211193008 ada0: 66.700MB/s transfers (UDMA4, PIO 512bytes) ada0: 3815MB (7813120 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 7751C) ada0: Previously was known as ad0 ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 ada1: <st9402115a 3.01=""> ATA-6 device ada1: Serial Number 5PV09ZED ada1: 100.000MB/s transfers (UDMA5, PIO 8192bytes) ada1: 38154MB (78140160 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada1: Previously was known as ad1</st9402115a></sandisk>Rather than
ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: <sandisk sdcfh-004g="" hdx="" 6.02=""> CFA-0 device ada0: Serial Number ABZ042211193008 ada0: 16.700MB/s transfers (PIO4, PIO 512bytes) ada0: 3815MB (7813120 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 7751C) ada0: Previously was known as ad0 ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 ada1: <st9402115a 3.01=""> ATA-6 device ada1: Serial Number 5PV09ZED ada1: 16.700MB/s transfers (PIO4, PIO 8192bytes) ada1: 38154MB (78140160 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada1: Previously was known as ad1</st9402115a></sandisk>As you point out, this setting affects them both. I've been trying to understand what granularity of control the driver gives me. From the ata man page there's the following which suggests per device control, but I don't currently understand what "specified device" means exactly.
@https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ata(4)&sektion=:
hint.ata.X.devX.mode
limits the initial ATA mode for the specified device on the specified channel.hint.ata.X.mode
limits the initial ATA mode for every device on the specified channel.I'm not sure how the master/slave IDE arrangement maps onto the above. Any pointers much appreciated!
Thanks,
Steve
-
Pretty sure the CF slot is always master if a CF card is in it so I would think it's dev0.
On my test box here which I haven't set loader.conf.local on it will boot if I use:
Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt. Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel] in 4 seconds... Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help. OK set hint.ata.0.dev0.mode=PIO4 OK boot Booting...So I'd say you're good with that.
Steve
-
Thank you sir, you're a scholar and a gentleman! :)
Your suggestion works a treat. I clearly had a bit of a mental block on what "devX" could be. I'd tried "0", but it hadn't occurred to me to used "dev0". :-[ I'm clearly not familiar enough with FreeBSD naming conventions.
[code]ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
ada0: <sandisk sdcfh-004g="" hdx="" 6.02="">CFA-0 device
ada0: Serial Number ABZ042211193008
ada0: 16.700MB/s transfers (PIO4, PIO 512bytes)
ada0: 3815MB (7813120 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 7751C)
ada0: Previously was known as ad0
ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0
ada1: <st9402115a 3.01="">ATA-6 device
ada1: Serial Number 5PV09ZED
ada1: 100.000MB/s transfers (UDMA5, PIO 8192bytes)
ada1: 38154MB (78140160 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)
ada1: Previously was known as ad1I'm now getting the performance I need for my disk used for logs and caching.
diskinfo -tv /dev/ad1 /dev/ad1 512 # sectorsize 40007761920 # mediasize in bytes (37G) 78140160 # mediasize in sectors 0 # stripesize 0 # stripeoffset 77520 # Cylinders according to firmware. 16 # Heads according to firmware. 63 # Sectors according to firmware. 5PV09ZED # Disk ident. Seek times: Full stroke: 250 iter in 7.926598 sec = 31.706 msec Half stroke: 250 iter in 6.203416 sec = 24.814 msec Quarter stroke: 500 iter in 9.877891 sec = 19.756 msec Short forward: 400 iter in 3.476113 sec = 8.690 msec Short backward: 400 iter in 2.381591 sec = 5.954 msec Seq outer: 2048 iter in 0.197696 sec = 0.097 msec Seq inner: 2048 iter in 0.179296 sec = 0.088 msec Transfer rates: outside: 102400 kbytes in 3.135350 sec = 32660 kbytes/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 3.745807 sec = 27337 kbytes/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 5.382397 sec = 19025 kbytes/secSteve</st9402115a></sandisk>
-
Nice! I'm going to have to try that sometime. :)
Steve
-
In testing the HD issue I ran that benchmark. Thought my result might ammuse you:
[2.2-RELEASE][root@pfSense.localdomain]/root: diskinfo -tv /dev/ada0 /dev/ada0 512 # sectorsize 20003880960 # mediasize in bytes (19G) 39070080 # mediasize in sectors 0 # stripesize 0 # stripeoffset 38760 # Cylinders according to firmware. 16 # Heads according to firmware. 63 # Sectors according to firmware. 32K60131T # Disk ident. Seek times: Full stroke: 250 iter in 11.840086 sec = 47.360 msec Half stroke: 250 iter in 8.878876 sec = 35.516 msec Quarter stroke: 500 iter in 15.334866 sec = 30.670 msec Short forward: 400 iter in 8.639504 sec = 21.599 msec Short backward: 400 iter in 7.131472 sec = 17.829 msec Seq outer: 2048 iter in 0.282496 sec = 0.138 msec Seq inner: 2048 iter in 1.086055 sec = 0.530 msec Transfer rates: outside: 102400 kbytes in 23.521335 sec = 4353 kbytes/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 20.436978 sec = 5011 kbytes/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 48.862760 sec = 2096 kbytes/secSomething not right. ::) Yet:
[2.2-RELEASE][root@pfSense.localdomain]/root: dmesg | grep ada ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: <toshiba mk2018gap="" m1.42="" a="">ATA-5 device ada0: Serial Number 32K60131T ada0: 100.000MB/s transfers (UDMA5, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: 19077MB (39070080 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada0: Previously was known as ad0 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ada0s1a [rw]...</toshiba>Just a knackered old drive? Works fine though, as long as you're not in a hurry!
Steve
-
Ouch. Not much use as a cache though as it's no faster than fiber broadband!
Steve
-
[2.2-RELEASE][root@pfSense.localdomain]/root: dmesg | grep ada ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: <toshiba mk2018gap="" m1.42="" a="">ATA-5 device ada0: Serial Number 32K60131T ada0: 100.000MB/s transfers (UDMA5, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: 19077MB (39070080 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada0: Previously was known as ad0 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ada0s1a [rw]...</toshiba>I was just looking in some old posts - Does it mean you have TRIM enabled on your TOSHIBA MK2018GAP drive?
-
No. I'm pretty sure that device is way too old to support TRIM
TRIM only applies to SSDs anyway.Steve
-
That's what I knew as well but this line in your dmesg:
ada0: 100.000MB/s transfers (UDMA5, PIO 8192bytes)
made me think otherwise.
-
What part of that implies TRIM?
That's the maximum speed on the interface, which is far, far faster than the drive can manage in this case. ;)Steve
-
Nothing in particular, to be honest. I see Ultra ATA/33 on my x750e as opposed to ATA/100 on yours:
[2.2.2-RELEASE][root@wg550.home]/root: dmesg|grep ada1 ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 ada1: <toshiba mk4026gax="" pa102d=""> ATA-6 device ada1: Serial Number 65IF3453T ada1: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, PIO 8192bytes) ada1: 38154MB (78140160 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada1: Previously was known as ad1</toshiba>It says ATA-6 device, so I was hoping to see UDMA5 in the next line but UDMA2 is the ATA-4, IIRC. I'm out of sys-admin business for while now, so may be talking rubbish as well. ;)
-
On a separate note, a really silly question (maybe): Is it worth putting a SSD in in WatchGuard/pfSense? Apart from speedy-boot, what added benefit over an PATA drive?
-
On a separate note, a really silly question (maybe): Is it worth putting a SSD in in WatchGuard/pfSense? Apart from speedy-boot, what added benefit over an PATA drive?
There are many IDE SSDs out to install inside and I really would go more with a SSD
rather then a IDE HDD because of less power, faster and not so hot. -
They are massively faster so if you're using it as a squid cache it will help a lot. Someone recently posted some numbers from one in the main Xe thread.
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=20095.msg501388#msg501388
Steve
-
Steve,
I know this is a really old post, but I'm hoping you were subscribed to it, and that this post reaches you.
I was hoping that you could go in to some more detail on the /etc/rc.embedded section of your post.
I followed your steps, modifying the device names to match my own set-up (i.e. using /dev/ada1s1a instead of /dev/ad1s1a) except I missed this in a few places. The end result was a system that would not boot correctly, and a file system that could not be re-mounted as read/write, so I ended up having to nuke the CF card and starting over.
That was totally my fault, but I'd like to try it again, which is why I'm hoping that you could go into a little more detail about what each section of the script in /etc/rc.embedded does.
In any case, I may end up using a spare 8GB USB flash drive rather than this 250GB SATA spinning rust drive i'm trying to use since that seems like overkill, but I'd really like to get this set-up to work too for academic reasons.
Again, I know this is an old topic, so if this does reach you, thanks for revisiting this post.
»Tony
(BTW I'm using a WatchGuard Firebox XTM 515)
-
Steve,
I know this is a really old post, but I'm hoping you were subscribed to it, and that this post reaches you.
I was hoping that you could go in to some more detail on the /etc/rc.embedded section of your post.
I followed your steps, modifying the device names to match my own set-up (i.e. using /dev/ada1s1a instead of /dev/ad1s1a) except I missed this in a few places. The end result was a system that would not boot correctly, and a file system that could not be re-mounted as read/write, so I ended up having to nuke the CF card and starting over.
That was totally my fault, but I'd like to try it again, which is why I'm hoping that you could go into a little more detail about what each section of the script in /etc/rc.embedded does.
In any case, I may end up using a spare 8GB USB flash drive rather than this 250GB SATA spinning rust drive i'm trying to use since that seems like overkill, but I'd really like to get this set-up to work too for academic reasons.
Again, I know this is an old topic, so if this does reach you, thanks for revisiting this post.
»Tony
(BTW I'm using a WatchGuard Firebox XTM 515)
Hi Tony,
The code section of interest is below:
# If a hard disk is installed then mount that on /var # otherwise use a ramdisk harddisk="/dev/ad1s1a" if [ -c $harddisk ] thenThis checks that /dev/ad1s1a exists as a character device.
echo -n "Using /var physical disk..." mount -o noatime $harddisk /varThis mounts the partition (in this case partition 'a') on /var.
# Ensure /var/run is removed on boot before daemons are started # It should arguably be a tmpfs, but this works fine rm -r /var/runRemove the /var/run directory as nanobsd expects this to not persist across reboots, and whilst that would be true for a RAM disk, the rotating rust remembers.
# sshd won't start if /var/empty exists on boot rm -r /var/emptySimilarly remove /var/empty.
elseThe following is the original code which creates a RAM disk for /var..
echo -n "Using /var memory disk..." mdmfs -S -M -s ${varsize} md /var # Create some needed directories /bin/mkdir -p /var/db # Ensure vi's recover directory is present /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/vi.recover/ fiSteve
-
:)
Steve!
Thank you very much for taking the time to reply! I'm not sure how I missed your reply (I must have my email settings wrong) but I didn't see it until just now, and I wanted to make sure I thanked you for replying!
I did end up going with the 8GB thumb drive, FYI, but I used basically this same method to get it to work, and it's working well.
Thanks again!
–Tony
-
I just installed a 120GB IDE HDD (Samsung) in my X1250e. It is currently running fine without the SD card. My problem now is how to fit the HDD inside? I can't find any tiny rails to use. Any suggestions and tips will be much appreciated. I am also planning to upgrade the memory which is currently 256MB. What's the maximum memory capacity can I install? Thanks a lot.
