Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    NeXusLAN Party Day 1 RRD Grapsh

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
    20 Posts 5 Posters 3.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      sideout
      last edited by

      Mostly it was when I was playing around with a few things with M1 and D values on some queues. But it is something to consider.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        sideout
        last edited by

        Noticed some timeouts to Google DNS. Swapped in Level 3's . Here are the queues now.

        NexuslanTrafficqueuesSundayafterdns.JPG
        NexuslanTrafficqueuesSundayafterdns.JPG_thumb
        Nexuslanprtglevel3dns.JPG
        Nexuslanprtglevel3dns.JPG_thumb

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          Harvy66
          last edited by

          Are you using DNS forwarding instead of Unbound? I rarely see timeouts to Google DNS, but I do sometimes see ping spikes, and not to both at the same time. So I many times have a ping -t running against 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4, and I will see on start to lag, but not the other. Never for long and very rarely.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            sideout
            last edited by

            Yes I am using the DNS Forwarder in PFSense.  Here is my DNS Benchmark.

            DNSBenchmark.JPG
            DNSBenchmark.JPG_thumb

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              sideout
              last edited by

              Final Post for now then will post end of LAN stats later.

              ![NeXusLAN Traffic Totals Sunday.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/NeXusLAN Traffic Totals Sunday.JPG)
              ![NeXusLAN Traffic Totals Sunday.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/NeXusLAN Traffic Totals Sunday.JPG_thumb)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                Nullity
                last edited by

                @sideout:

                Mostly it was when I was playing around with a few things with M1 and D values on some queues. But it is something to consider.

                Any luck?

                Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
                -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  cmb
                  last edited by

                  Good stuff, thanks for sharing.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    sideout
                    last edited by

                    I set the values and i noticed alot more dropped packets when I did that. I changed it back.  Probably will need to do more testing at home.

                    Also think I was running into some issue with the NIC's.  The server had Broadcomm NIC's and i put some customizations in the config file as per the PFSense docs wiki and I think I am going to go back to Intel NIC's .

                    I have 2 4 port Intel NIC Server cards.  The old router had intel NIC's in it.  It seems that PFSense likes the Intel NIC better .

                    Anyone have any issues with setting hardware offloading or ToE with NIC's?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • H
                      Harvy66
                      last edited by

                      If I remember correctly, ToEs do not honor traffic shaping because the ToE is the one sending the packets, not the shaper. I could be wrong.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        sideout
                        last edited by

                        Okay. I will have to test those settings as well.  I saw the other post about Codel with UDP and dropping packets. Maybe that was some of my issue I was having.

                        Will have to test with putting UDP only queues under some other queueing and then using Codel for TCP only queues.

                        There were some complaints of packet loss in some of the games using UDP solely

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.