Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    File server routed through pfSense

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    4 Posts 3 Posters 796 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Offline
      arduino
      last edited by

      I have a file server on my LAN-1 network (10.0.0.0) and clients whom access the file server on my LAN-2 network (10.0.1.0).

      LAN-1 is high security network with only internal access servers
      LAN-2 is for desktop clients, about 90.

      I poked holes in the firewall to allow SMB shared to be accessed on my LAN-1 network and obviously the throughput causes higher CPU usage on pfSense.

      My question is:

      Is there a better way to do this? I don't want to put the file servers on the same network as the clients for security reasons, and having two interfaces on the file server so that it can be accessed from the client side without being routed through pfSense kind of negates the purpose.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        doktornotor Banned
        last edited by

        @arduino:

        Is there a better way to do this? I don't want to put the file servers on the same network as the clients for security reasons, and having two interfaces on the file server so that it can be accessed from the client side without being routed through pfSense kind of negates the purpose.

        Hmmm, no, not really. Would pretty much defeat the FW purpose, as you noted.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T Offline
          tim.mcmanus
          last edited by

          I have a similar setup and don't notice any CPU hit.  IMHO you might need a more powerful CPU if that's the case.  For comparison, I am running an i3-2100 and barely hit 15% CPU.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Offline
            arduino
            last edited by

            I have a Core 2 Duo E7400 right now which hits ~50% @ 1GBs.

            Might upgrade to a Core 2 Quad if I can't manage to drop spike to an acceptable level ( ~30%).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.