Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DNS issues with 2 nested PFSense machines.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    6 Posts 4 Posters 870 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P Offline
      phr0ze
      last edited by

      Ok. I had a strange problem. I was helping a friend setup a PFsense box and I figured I could just plug the WAN of his box into my LAN to get updates and packages.

      Well everything internet related was extremely slow to respond and mostly failed. I went to DNS diagnostics and after a long wait it appeared only IPV6 was resolving.

      He has a base install, and none of the machines on my network have DNS issues. Is there something going on because of the double NAT? Or the fact that both NATs have the same DHCP address space?

      I know its not ideal but I need a way to configure PFSense machines inside my network.

      Thanks.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KOMK Online
        KOM
        last edited by

        If you have WAN set to be assigned by DHCP and your friend's LAN has a DHCP server, then it should just work.  If you have to manually configure then it's just a matter of using the parameters of his LAN for your WAN configuration.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P Offline
          phr0ze
          last edited by

          Yep, both were automatic. My friend's PFSense properly recieved an IP. It also properly issued an IP to my laptop. Both DHCP use the 192.168.1.0/24 space. But this shouldn't matter as NAT should still be working.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ Offline
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by

            so your lan was 192.168.1.0/24 and his wan would of gotten 192.168.1.x and his lan was also 192.168.1.0/24 – yeah that going to be a problem.

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8.1, 25.07.1

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P Offline
              phr0ze
              last edited by

              Ok. If thats the answer I'll setup using something different. Perhaps I can vlan that port for a less used DHCP space.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T Offline
                tim.mcmanus
                last edited by

                IMHO, have your friend set his LAN range to something like 10.0.1.0/24 to avoid the whole issue. I always get off of 192.168.0.0/16 entirely and go to a 10.0.0.0/8 range instead to avoid these issues. Too many networking devices default to 192.168.0.0/24 or 192.168.1.0/24 that you'll eventually get hit with this conflict (like trying to VPN into your pfsense LAN from a hotel and realizing that you can't because of the subnet conflict).

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.