Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DNS Lookups going to Google DNS even though I have OpenDNS configured?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    15 Posts 4 Posters 1.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DerelictD Offline
      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
      last edited by

      What are you giving to your clients via DHCP?  What are the DNS servers configured on client 192.168.4.208?

      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        JimPhreak
        last edited by

        @Derelict:

        What are you giving to your clients via DHCP?  What are the DNS servers configured on client 192.168.4.208?

        I have no DNS configured in DHCP so it should be using the default.  The static DNS server on 192.168.4.208 is 192.168.4.1 (LAN IP/gateway of pfSense) but I've also tried putting in the OpenDNS server IPs there as well to no avail.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • KOMK Offline
          KOM
          last edited by

          Is it possible that there is an application running on .208 that is doing the resolving for whatever reason, like a DNS benchmark for instance?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD Offline
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by

            Dude.  Those logs say 192.168.4.208 is making requests to google's 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4. and they are being blocked by the rules on the LAN interface.

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              JimPhreak
              last edited by

              @KOM:

              Is it possible that there is an application running on .208 that is doing the resolving for whatever reason, like a DNS benchmark for instance?

              Nope, I have nothing that would do any resolving running on .208.  It's a linux storage box that just has a few Dockers running (like Plex and a few others but nothing that has any DNS configured).

              @Derelict:

              Dude.  Those logs say 192.168.4.208 is making requests to google's 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4. and they are being blocked by the rules on the LAN interface.

              That's correct, I purposely am blocking them.  The question is why are they making requests to Google?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DerelictD Offline
                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                last edited by

                That is a great question for the makers of that box.  it has nothing to do with pfSense.

                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J Offline
                  JimPhreak
                  last edited by

                  @Derelict:

                  That is a great question for the makers of that box.  it has nothing to do with pfSense.

                  I wasn't blaming pfsense I was just looking for some insight from others running pfsense.  Being that I'm pretty new to pfsense I wasn't sure if I misconfigured something on it.  But I'll look more closely at my server now.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DerelictD Offline
                    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                    last edited by

                    dig/drill are your friends

                    On 192.168.4.208:

                    You can selectively do DNS queries to various servers:

                    dig @8.8.8.8 www.google.com
                    dig @192.168.4.1 www.google.com

                    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                    A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                    DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • KOMK Offline
                      KOM
                      last edited by

                      It could also be something as simple as someone running nslookup from the command line and then specifying the Google DNS.

                      dns.png
                      dns.png_thumb

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J Offline
                        JimPhreak
                        last edited by

                        @KOM:

                        It could also be something as simple as someone running nslookup from the command line and then specifying the Google DNS.

                        I would but it's a linux box.  And the dig/drill commands don't appear to be present.

                        It looks like it's an issue with one of my dockers though so I'm looking into that.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • KOMK Offline
                          KOM
                          last edited by

                          I would but it's a linux box.

                          cough

                          dns.png
                          dns.png_thumb

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ Offline
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                            last edited by

                            "I would but it's a linux box.  And the dig/drill commands don't appear to be present."

                            Well then install them..  What linux distro are you using that nslookup is not installed?

                            Last login: Wed Jul  8 12:02:03 2015 from 10.0.8.6
                            user@ubuntu:~$ nslookup

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 25.07 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J Offline
                              JimPhreak
                              last edited by

                              @johnpoz:

                              "I would but it's a linux box.  And the dig/drill commands don't appear to be present."

                              Well then install them..  What linux distro are you using that nslookup is not installed?

                              Last login: Wed Jul  8 12:02:03 2015 from 10.0.8.6
                              user@ubuntu:~$ nslookup

                              It's an unRAID server which is built off Slackware.  But I've determined it's definitely an issue with a particular Docker.  I see the nameserver's listed as the Google DNS servers in the Docker's log so it's not even really a Linux issue.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • KOMK Offline
                                KOM
                                last edited by

                                But I've determined it's definitely an issue with a particular Docker.

                                For me, playing detective is the funnest part of the job.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.