Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Upgrade 2.2.3 to 2.2.4 - slow

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
    17 Posts 7 Posters 2.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • peteP
      pete
      last edited by

      Gui Dashboard shows:

      pfSense is booting then packages will be reinstalled in the background.

      Do not make changes in the GUI until this is complete.

      Console shows it loading NTP client.

      Logging in to box via SSH appears normal.

      Going to reboot it anyways…

      • Pete

      Auto mater
      23.09.1-RELEASE (amd64)
      built on Mon Dec 11 12:24:00 CST 2023
      FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT
      PFSense + Qotom - Master
      PFSense + Jetway - Backup
      PFSense + Jetway - Backup
      PFSense + Generic - Backup

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        stanthewizard
        last edited by

        Use a veeam backup to restore my 2.2.3 and removed pfblockerNG
        NO ISSUE to update

        This package is a pain … (sometime reboot takes 30 minutes ... I'm force to delete aliases to make pFense boot)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          A failure to reboot + can't load kernel usually means it ran out of disk space while upgrading. Not normally a problem on physical systems but if your VM has an unusually small disk it can lead to trouble in that area.

          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            stanthewizard
            last edited by

            In my case 16 gig …
            plenty of room

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              doktornotor Banned
              last edited by

              @stanthewizard:

              This package is a pain … (sometime reboot takes 30 minutes ... I'm force to delete aliases to make pFense boot)

              That's been actually fixed: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4442

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                stanthewizard
                last edited by

                not implemented in the latest version downloadable through packages

                or it's not working

                or I'm dumb  ;D

                For the info booth of my pfsense upgraded flawlessly after restore from veeam backup then removed pfblockerNG

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • BBcan177B
                  BBcan177 Moderator
                  last edited by

                  Its not the pfBNG package that is causing these issues at reboot. If the hardware is on Nano or Ramdisk, the /var folder is wiped at reboot and pfSense is trying to load the Alias file that doesn't exist in the /var/db/aliastable folder. There was a bug fix to reduce that timeout to a Minute per alias I believe.

                  The only workaround without some base pfSense code changes would be to Un-Install pfBlockerNG ( and only needed For Nano/Ramdisk Installs With "Keep Settings" checked ) before any pfSense Upgrades. Following the Upgrade, do an Install of pfBNG and follow with a "Force Update".

                  "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                  Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                  Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                  Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    doktornotor Banned
                    last edited by

                    @BBcan177:

                    There was a bug fix to reduce that timeout to a Minute per alias I believe.

                    It's actually down to 5 secs now… so, really a non-issue even with tons of aliases.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      stanthewizard
                      last edited by

                      not on nano or ramdisk
                      ESXI VM with 2gig of Ram and 16Gig of disk

                      pfblockerNG gone … no more issue

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        doktornotor Banned
                        last edited by

                        @stanthewizard:

                        not on nano or ramdisk

                        If you read the above bug - actually YES. Tested on multiple Alix boxes. The delay is down to 5 secs per URL table alias.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • BBcan177B
                          BBcan177 Moderator
                          last edited by

                          I think Jimp was correct and the VM ran out of Space.  Packages like Squid and pfBNG can take some space depending on whats configured and if things like Squid Caching is enabled. On pfSense upgrade, it also has to pull down and extract the full pfSense image before it will upgrade the VM. Probably pushed it over the edge and caused that "Load kernel" issue when it ran out of space.

                          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            stanthewizard
                            last edited by

                            I just was saying that I wasn't on ram or nano
                            That I have disk space

                            My 2 pfsenses are not in those cases

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.