Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Master not sharing states

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved HA/CARP/VIPs
    4 Posts 2 Posters 2.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      firegrass
      last edited by

      First I hope this post isn't just more noise…  :)

      I have a u11 rack in colo. I've got two embedded pfsense boxes running carp/pfsync. The carp side of things it working properly, however I'm pretty sure firewall state information is not being shared.

      Do shared states show in the Diagnostics -> States on the slave?

      On the slave I have the below. It is NOT on the master tho.

      pfsync  	192.168.10.2 -> 224.0.0.240  	SINGLE:NO_TRAFFIC
      

      Naturally when the slave takes over all connections are dropped.

      Master…

      pfsync0: flags=41 <up,running>mtu 2020
      	pfsync: syncdev: lo0 syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128</up,running>
      

      Slave…

      pfsync0: flags=41 <up,running>mtu 1348
      	pfsync: syncdev: sis6 syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128</up,running>
      

      Surely these should both be sis6?

      Anyone with ideas? This smells like a bug to me…

      TIA

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        morbus
        last edited by

        You should have the same states on both boxes. The webgui can be a little out sometimes as it catches up (it refreshes slower than pf sync)

        Check the "Synchronize Interface" selection on your master it looks like it is using the loopback device lo0. This should be on a real interface normally the one you have cross wired to the slave.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F
          firegrass
          last edited by

          Checked and triple checked. It's configured just like like the flash guide. I'm using soekris boards and I don't they they are powerful enough, I thought I could 'get away' with low traffic for a while. Not sure if that could create a problem too.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            morbus
            last edited by

            I think the soekris boards should be ok.

            even if they were too weak it shouldn't stop it being setup right it just might not work properly.

            Check and resave the carp config on the master.
            Check the masters interface assignments especially the CARP sync link.
            Check the subnet masks on both nodes for the CARP sync link

            If it still won't go post a screen shot of the carp setup for both boxes and the sync interfaces

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.