Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    TIP: If you have an IPMI motherboard and constantly pull an internal IP on WAN

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    20 Posts 12 Posters 17.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      mifronte
      last edited by

      I leave all my IPMI ports configured to DHCP with no problems, yet.  IPMI network config is very sticky, meaning, it will hang unto its DHCP settings until you completely disconnect all power to the motherboard.  AFAIK, even the DHCP lease time expiring doesn't force IPMI to query the DHCP server.

      I can have pfsense shutdown and still access the IPMI interface.  However, I have yet to try disconnecting the power cord when my pfSense box is shutdown to see what happens when IPMI issue a DHCP request when power is restored.

      SuperMicro Atom C2758 A1SRI-2758F 16GB
      2.8.0 (amd64)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        doktornotor Banned
        last edited by

        And the "advantage" of this setup is exactly what? Prey that it doesn't break in the worst possible moment?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          pfcode
          last edited by

          Yep, It solved the issue that pfSense won't get WAN IP address from my bridged cable modem (WAN was assigned to igb0) after a shut down. This problem was puzzled me for several days until I saw this post. and now it works. Thanks.

          Release: pfSense 2.4.3(amd64)
          M/B: Supermicro A1SRi-2558F
          HDD: Intel X25-M 160G
          RAM: 2x8Gb Kingston ECC ValueRAM
          AP: Netgear R7000 (XWRT), Unifi AC Pro

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            codyst
            last edited by

            @robi:

            But why on earth would anybody leave the IPMI port configured as DHCP?
            If pfSense is the DHCP server, but it's not booted up yet, one might end up not being able to connect to IPMI either, since it's got no valid internal IP. In most cases just setting a normal internal IP address to IPMI, and connecting the port to a switch will save from situations like this…

            This is exactly what I did when I put my system together. I set the bmc ip statically to get 192.168.1.2 and I have had no problems whatsoever.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              Guest
              last edited by

              But why on earth would anybody leave the IPMI port configured as DHCP?

              I consider, any IPMI interface must have his own static IP address.
              We have all connected to the management VLAN to get a dedicated contact.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                arduino
                last edited by

                We have dozens of SuperMicro servers and they all do this by default, you must switch to only use the dedicated IPMI interface.

                If you are using the nic in a virtualization environment, it will be wide open as well.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  cmb
                  last edited by

                  @arduino:

                  We have dozens of SuperMicro servers and they all do this by default, you must switch to only use the dedicated IPMI interface.

                  Yep, they do. On the ones we sell, as part of the installation process that "feature" gets disabled so it only uses the dedicated IPMI port. It wants to use what most people assign as the WAN port as its fallback, which is potentially a very serious security issue if we didn't configure it more sensibly.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    arduino
                    last edited by

                    Honestly, there are so many bugs/security issues with Supermicro's IPMI interfaces that I wanted to just disable them all anyway.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      Guest
                      last edited by

                      Honestly, there are so many bugs/security issues with Supermicro's IPMI interfaces that I wanted to just disable them all anyway.

                      In our company we had not only one times a problem with this boards or their IPMI LAN Port
                      and friends of mine connect them to Aten KVM Switches up to >100 devices with any kind of problem!

                      For sure I will consider that this ports must be configured as well as all new boards are arriving.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        doktornotor Banned
                        last edited by

                        @BlueKobold:

                        In our company we had not only one times a problem with this boards or their IPMI LAN Port

                        Maybe you just don't know about the problem.

                        https://www.thomas-krenn.com/en/wiki/Supermicro_IPMI_Security_Updates_July_2014
                        https://www.thomas-krenn.com/en/wiki/Supermicro_IPMI_Security_Updates_November_2013

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.