Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Firewall rules hitcount for pfSense 2.1.5 and 2.2.4

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved webGUI
    50 Posts 16 Posters 17.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • marcellocM Offline
      marcelloc
      last edited by

      @athurdent:

      Wasn't able to try it out yet. But if that means, the byte counter does not show anymore when hovering there with the mouse, that would be too bad. Maybe the Hits field could show
      Packets(Bytes)/States
      or something similar?

      I'ts still working inside the td with mouse over, I've just included the option to kill when there are active states and only over the numbers.

      Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

      Help a community developer! ;D

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • marcellocM Offline
        marcelloc
        last edited by

        @athurdent:

        Something seems odd with pfSense handling auto-added Port Forward rules. They get a name like "USER_RULE: NAT …" and there's no tracker ID.

        Edit and save rule created by nat to force the trackerid

        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

        Help a community developer! ;D

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • marcellocM Offline
          marcelloc
          last edited by

          @athurdent:

          On to the next problem, Port Aliases. While pf let's us write single-line rules with something like

          port {  25  465  587 }
          

          it automatically creates a separate rule for every single port. pfctl will show three rules for the example above whilst our ruleset only has a single rule for this.

          check if new code fixes it. (v0.31)

          @78(1439883226) pass in quick on em0 reply-to (em0 172.17.12.1) inet proto tcp from any to (self:3) port = http flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: 1439883226"
            [ Evaluations: 17        Packets: 0         Bytes: 0           States: 0     ]
            [ Inserted: pid 23535 State Creations: 3319624344]
          @79(1439883226) pass in quick on em0 reply-to (em0 172.17.12.1) inet proto tcp from any to (self:3) port = https flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: 1439883226"
            [ Evaluations: 17        Packets: 763       Bytes: 442121      States: 6     ]
            [ Inserted: pid 23535 State Creations: 3319624408]
          @80(1439883226) pass in quick on em0 reply-to (em0 172.17.12.1) inet proto tcp from any to (self:3) port = ssh flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: 1439883226"
            [ Evaluations: 1         Packets: 555       Bytes: 81812       States: 1     ]
            [ Inserted: pid 23535 State Creations: 3321614424]
          @81(1439883226) pass in quick on em0 reply-to (em0 172.17.12.1) inet proto tcp from any to (self:3) port = 8443 flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: 1439883226"
            [ Evaluations: 0         Packets: 0         Bytes: 0           States: 0     ]
            [ Inserted: pid 23535 State Creations: 3321614400]
          @82(1439883226) pass in quick on em0 reply-to (em0 172.17.12.1) inet proto tcp from any to (self:3) port = domain flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: 1439883226"
            [ Evaluations: 0         Packets: 0         Bytes: 0           States: 0     ]
            [ Inserted: pid 23535 State Creations: 3321614376]
          
          

          rules_count_kill_states_3.png_thumb
          rules_count_kill_states_3.png

          Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

          Help a community developer! ;D

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Offline
            athurdent
            last edited by

            Thanks, works great.
            But one odd thing I noticed is, that rules with multiple ports like those you fixed seem to get their counter cleared on every filter reload. At the same time, my other "normal" rules do not suffer from this.
            Are you seeing this too, or am I doing something wrong?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • marcellocM Offline
              marcelloc
              last edited by

              More features on version 0.4 for pfsense 2.2, now we can view hit count, list and kill States(with ajax to keep it light and fast).

              rules_count_kill_states_3.png
              rules_count_kill_states_3.png_thumb
              rules_count_show_states.png
              rules_count_show_states.png_thumb

              Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

              Help a community developer! ;D

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JackLJ Offline
                JackL
                last edited by

                Very nice!

                Good job as always, marcelloc!

                []`s
                Jack

                Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com
                Soluções: https://conexti.com.br

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  athurdent
                  last edited by

                  marcelloc, the lastest update works great, thanks again.

                  Still, the new hitcount feature reveals that some rules with multiple ports like "{  25  465  587 }" or multiple protocols like "{ tcp udp }" get their packet/byte counter reset on reload. Evaluations / State Creations seem not affected. Nobody else seeing this?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • H Offline
                    haddock
                    last edited by

                    Awesome feature!

                    Can't wait to see this merged upstream!  ;D

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • GertjanG Offline
                      Gertjan
                      last edited by

                      Good job.
                      Test-driving it on a 2.2.4. Works as advertised.

                      Git->Clone->Patch->Push-request this  :)

                      No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                      Edit : and where are the logs ??

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B Offline
                        bennyc
                        last edited by

                        +1 thanks Marcello, really useful feature.
                        Love to see that merged also  ;D

                        4x XG-7100 (2xHA), 1x SG-4860, 1x SG-2100
                        1x PC Engines APU2C4, 1x PC Engines APU1C4

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • marcellocM Offline
                          marcelloc
                          last edited by

                          Pull request sent do 2.3-DEVELOPMENT

                          https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/pull/1892

                          Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                          Help a community developer! ;D

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • L Offline
                            LinuxTracker
                            last edited by

                            Very, very nice.

                            (Also: One more column of info feels like a step toward widescreen display!)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • marcellocM Offline
                              marcelloc
                              last edited by

                              I suggest all who cant test to do it on 2.2 and/or 2.3-devel and comment on pull request. Maybe with more people testing, it get merged faster…

                              Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                              Help a community developer! ;D

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • L Offline
                                LinuxTracker
                                last edited by

                                @marcelloc:

                                I suggest all who cant test to do it on 2.2 and/or 2.3-devel and comment on pull request. Maybe with more people testing, it get merged faster…

                                Done.

                                The more I play with this the more I like it.
                                On mouseover, I get the data I was trying (unsuccessfully) to glean out of pfTop.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • marcellocM Offline
                                  marcelloc
                                  last edited by

                                  @LinuxTracker:

                                  The more I play with this the more I like it.

                                  me too.  :)

                                  @LinuxTracker:

                                  On mouseover, I get the data I was trying (unsuccessfully) to glean out of pfTop.

                                  Great!

                                  Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                  Help a community developer! ;D

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • marcellocM Offline
                                    marcelloc
                                    last edited by

                                    Send a new pull request with almost all code working on 2.3 with bootstrap.

                                    I'll need some help to adjust the code to popup traffic on rule click.
                                    The code is there but is not visible after ajax return.

                                    https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/pull/1901

                                    Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                    Help a community developer! ;D

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B Offline
                                      brandur
                                      last edited by

                                      I noticed that 2.3 is nearing Beta stage. Has your great improvement been merged with 2.3(and approved)?

                                      SG-4860 w/128GB SSD & 8GB RAM

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • marcellocM Offline
                                        marcelloc
                                        last edited by

                                        @brandur:

                                        I noticed that 2.3 is nearing Beta stage. Has your great improvement been merged with 2.3(and approved)?

                                        unfortunately no. :(

                                        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                        Help a community developer! ;D

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • B Offline
                                          brandur
                                          last edited by

                                          @marcelloc:

                                          @brandur:

                                          I noticed that 2.3 is nearing Beta stage. Has your great improvement been merged with 2.3(and approved)?

                                          unfortunately no. :(

                                          That is just very sad news  :'(
                                          Was there any particular reason it didn't "make it"?

                                          (Then the question becomes. Are you going to try to get it committed for a higher version?)

                                          SG-4860 w/128GB SSD & 8GB RAM

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • B Offline
                                            bennyc
                                            last edited by

                                            Hmm, not nice because this was a super no brainer feature that was very very helpful  >:(
                                            I see the pull request has a "CLA label". I have no idea for what CLA stands in this case  :-[ Could someone shed a light here?

                                            4x XG-7100 (2xHA), 1x SG-4860, 1x SG-2100
                                            1x PC Engines APU2C4, 1x PC Engines APU1C4

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.