Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    My isp only give me one ipv6 address no any prefix unless I bridge WAN and LAN

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    22 Posts 5 Posters 4.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • awebsterA
      awebster
      last edited by

      Yeah, I did all that, got the T-Shirt.  The only problem I've had is with Gmail, they really don't have their act together to receive SMTP from IPv6 addresses, despite having PTR and TXT records all correctly defined.
      You basically have to block SMTP outbound on IPv6 in the hopes that your mail server/client is smart enough to try IPv4 instead.  That was some months ago, I gave up trying to bend that spoon.

      –A.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        doktornotor Banned
        last edited by

        @johnpoz:

        Knew it was something like that have been sage for quite some time would have to checked if im blocked have 64 for long time with 48 more recent when i wanted enable it on more of my segments and for vpn clients

        Well, basically if you cannot see the option of unblocking in the control panel and have the traffic blocked, you need to email them…

        @awebster:

        Yeah, I did all that, got the T-Shirt.  The only problem I've had is with Gmail, they really don't have their act together to receive SMTP from IPv6 addresses, despite having PTR and TXT records all correctly defined.
        You basically have to block SMTP outbound on IPv6 in the hopes that your mail server/client is smart enough to try IPv4 instead.  That was some months ago, I gave up trying to bend that spoon.

        No problems with Gmail and SMTP over IPv6 here… (You need the proper PTR record for your mailserver for sure; other than that, check Google docs.)

        https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126?p=ipv6_authentication_error&rd=1#authentication

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          under the ipv6 for gmail they do state you should have spf or dkim setup aswell… So maybe that is your issue?  This is good practice be your ipv4 or 6 if you ask me.

          "The sending domain should pass either SPF check or DKIM check. Otherwise, mail might be marked as spam."

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • awebsterA
            awebster
            last edited by

            @doktornotor:

            No problems with Gmail and SMTP over IPv6 here… (You need the proper PTR record for your mailserver for sure; other than that, check Google docs.)

            https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126?p=ipv6_authentication_error&rd=1#authentication

            I'm happy to hear that someone has it working!

            I did all the required setup (TXT SPF record and PTR).  Gmail inbound would work for a while then start bouncing messages claiming it was spam, then all of a sudden go back to working normally.  I just couldn't get it working reliably. 
            I'd get this message:

            
            <<< 550-5.7.1 [2001:470:x:y::z      12] Our system has detected that
            <<< 550-5.7.1 this message is likely unsolicited mail. To reduce the amount of spam
            <<< 550-5.7.1 sent to Gmail, this message has been blocked. Please visit
            <<< 550 5.7.1 https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 for more information.
            
            

            I was initially thinking that it was Google doing some funky IPv4 to IPv6 AS number correlation to see if known domains were popping up from different ASes or different geographically disparate places since the HE.NET tunnel clearly does both, but its not related to HE.NET address space either as I've had similar issues with native IPv6 setups from the same AS as the IPv4 sending email into Google where it works intermittently.

            Here's my obfuscated output, I can't find anything wrong though.

            MX lookup

            
            # dig example.org mx @8.8.8.8
            
            ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.4 <<>> example.org mx
            ;; global options: +cmd
            ;; Got answer:
            ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15441
            ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 2
            
            ;; QUESTION SECTION:
            ;example.org.                  IN      MX
            
            ;; ANSWER SECTION:
            example.org.           3323    IN      MX      10 mail.example.org.
            example.org.           3323    IN      MX      15 mail6.example.org.
            
            ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
            mail.example.org.      1480    IN      A       72.x.x.x
            mail6.example.org.     2026    IN      AAAA    2001:470:x:y::z
            
            

            TXT lookup; 3 queries, setup the same way Google has setup their SPF records!

            
            # dig example.org txt @8.8.8.8
            
            ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.4 <<>> example.org txt
            ;; global options: +cmd
            ;; Got answer:
            ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 40448
            ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
            
            ;; QUESTION SECTION:
            ;example.org.                  IN      TXT
            
            ;; ANSWER SECTION:
            example.org.           2295    IN      TXT     "v=spf1 include:_spf.example.org include:_spf2.example.org  ~all"
            
            # dig _spf.example.org txt @8.8.8.8
            
            ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.4 <<>> _spf.example.org txt
            ;; global options: +cmd
            ;; Got answer:
            ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 50484
            ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
            
            ;; QUESTION SECTION:
            ;_spf.example.org.             IN      TXT
            
            ;; ANSWER SECTION:
            _spf.example.org.      2256    IN      TXT     "v=spf1 a mx ip4:72.x.x.x ~all"
            
            # dig _spf2.example.org txt @8.8.8.8
            
            ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.4 <<>> _spf2.example.org txt
            ;; global options: +cmd
            ;; Got answer:
            ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61342
            ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
            
            ;; QUESTION SECTION:
            ;_spf2.example.org.            IN      TXT
            
            ;; ANSWER SECTION:
            _spf2.example.org.     2248    IN      TXT     "v=spf1 ip6:2001:470:x:y::z ~all"
            
            

            PTR lookup

            
            # dig -x 2001:470:x:y::z @8.8.8.8
            
            ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.4 <<>> -x 2001:470:x:y::z
            ;; global options: +cmd
            ;; Got answer:
            ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 17032
            ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
            
            ;; QUESTION SECTION:
            ;z.z.z.z.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.y.y.y.y.x.x.x.x.0.7.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. IN PTR
            
            ;; ANSWER SECTION:
            z.z.z.z.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.y.y.y.y.x.x.x.x.0.7.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. 41656 IN PTR mail6.example.org.
            
            

            –A.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              doktornotor Banned
              last edited by

              
              example.org.           3323    IN      MX      10 mail.example.org.
              example.org.           3323    IN      MX      15 mail6.example.org.
              
              

              Are those two different mailservers?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • awebsterA
                awebster
                last edited by

                No they are the same box.  I initially had just mail, but that didn't work so I split out the ipv6 address of the server into a separate hostname for troubleshooting.

                –A.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  doktornotor Banned
                  last edited by

                  This is really not how it should be done. There should be a single MX record, with PTRs for both A and AAAA records that resolve back to mail.example.com. "That didn't work" - as usually - ain't a useful problem description. Also, the SPF needs the A record added.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                    last edited by

                    So what does the email server report mail or mail6?  If the ptr and forward don't match = spam..  so you could have problems using 2 names when only 1 server.

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • awebsterA
                      awebster
                      last edited by

                      Thanks…
                      Didn't work means it exhibited the same random gmail bounce messages on sending to @gmail and @gmail_hosted recipients.  Before and after splitting out the ipv6 host didn't change the observed behaviour, so p
                      @doktornotor:

                      Also, the SPF needs the A record added.

                      Not sure I understand that, care to elaborate?

                      –A.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        doktornotor Banned
                        last edited by

                        You need ip4:x.x.x.x in there besides the ip6 in the TXT record. If you are only sending mail from the one MX, all you need is:

                        Like:

                        
                        example.org.      2256    IN      TXT     "v=spf1 mx ~all"
                        
                        

                        (Meanwhile, if you got yourself a spammer reputation on that /64 already, you'd be better off deleting the tunnel and requesting a new one with HE. Also, I'd make sure any outbound SMTP is blocked from LAN, except for the mailserver IP. Otherwise, requesting new prefixes over and over again gets annoying quickly…)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • awebsterA
                          awebster
                          last edited by

                          Thanks very much dok!

                          You put me on the right track.  Problem was subtle, but makes sense now in hindsight.
                          I had stacked the SPF records, just as Google does, but if you put a "a" or "mx" inside the TXT record it is applying it to the fqdn of the stacked record, not the base record from which it was included originally.
                          So while I had _spf.example.org.  IN TXT  "v=spf1 a mx ip4:72.x.x.x ~all", the SPF parser was looking for an A and MX record in _spf.example.org, not in example.org which included _spf.example.org.

                          I've cleaned it up, folded mail6 back into mail and I'll give it another spin.  Strange though that it never has issues with IPv4 delivery, yet that is where the source of the problem lies.

                          –A.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.