Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Help with IPSEC not connecting

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
    12 Posts 3 Posters 7.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      cmb
      last edited by

      You have a phase 1 mismatch of some sort, no way to tell what from that. Just make sure things match up on both sides.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        Dinmiller
        last edited by

        It's hard to tell what it could be because there are some different settings on the newer that aren’t there on the older version. I may just have to create a new machine up at the main office with an up to date pfsense and build it out.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          Dinmiller
          last edited by

          picture 1 and 2 are the old pfsense and 3 4 5 are of the new one. any tips at this point would be appreciated

          1.png
          1.png_thumb
          2.png
          2.png_thumb
          3.png
          3.png_thumb
          4.png
          4.png_thumb
          5.png
          5.png_thumb

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cmb
            last edited by

            The ones that matter in the context of no proposal chosen are identical between them. Interface, remote gateway, identifiers. Make them main mode, you don't want aggressive. AES would be better than 3DES (faster and more secure) though that won't matter since they match.

            There should be no reason you can't upgrade the 2.0x side, that's extremely dated at this point.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              Dinmiller
              last edited by

              Well i changed what you suggested, and double checked the other settings, in the logs im still getting spam of delete phase 2, So I am still at a loss lol,

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                Dinmiller
                last edited by

                Is it possible all i need to do is delete and recreate the tunnel on the old one,  i never re created it i just assumed it would work with the new one considering the ip and everything stayed the same.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  cmb
                  last edited by

                  The part above the "delete phase 2 handler" is what matters (that just indicates a P1 mismatch), is that still no proposal chosen?

                  Updating it after an IP change is fine, no need to re-create it.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    Dinmiller
                    last edited by

                    Dec 5 08:20:09 racoon: ERROR: phase1 negotiation failed due to time up. 586c519806462d76:0000000000000000
                    Dec 5 08:20:01 racoon: []: [66.xx.xxx.xxx] INFO: request for establishing IPsec-SA was queued due to no phase1 found.
                    Dec 5 08:19:59 racoon: []: [66.xx.xxx.xxx] ERROR: notification NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN received in unencrypted informational exchange.
                    Dec 5 08:19:50 racoon: INFO: delete phase 2 handler.
                    Dec 5 08:19:50 racoon: []: [66.xx.xxx.xxx] ERROR: phase2 negotiation failed due to time up waiting for phase1 [Remote Side not responding]. ESP 66.xx.xxx.xxx[0]->208.xxx.xxx.xxx[0]
                    Dec 5 08:19:49 racoon: []: [66.xx.xxx.xxx] ERROR: notification NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN received in unencrypted informational exchange.

                    Thats what im still getting

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      Dinmiller
                      last edited by

                      charon: 07[IKE] <2371> no IKE config found for 66.xx.xxx.xxx…208.xxx.xxx.xxx, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN

                      I am getting that on the other firewall

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        Netizen1
                        last edited by

                        I just did this last week, but I was on the same version of pfsense at both sites. (2.2.5 RELEASE)

                        Why can't you upgrade your  2.0.3 side?
                        Did you double check your settings, making sure you're entering the proper IP's in 'Remote Gateway'? On gw1 enter the remote IP of gw2 and vice versa…
                        Set 'Key Exchange version' to Auto
                        Set 'Negotiation mode' to Main mode as cmb suggested

                        Is there an Auto setting for 'NAT Traversal' in the old version? In 2.2.5 there's only Auto or Force

                        Double check your 'Pre-Shared Key' in both firewalls, they have to match!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          Dinmiller
                          last edited by

                          Yeah I've double checked all of that, the client doesn't want to upgrade yet because he is afraid of it causing issues.  But i think that may be the only choice

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.