Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    ..not sure if my Traffic Shaper settings are correct?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
    10 Posts 3 Posters 4.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      A Former User
      last edited by

      I have just setup HFSC traffic shaping, all the queues are working properly, however, when I saturate the bandwidth pfSense shows lots of LAN Errors In? and also there appears to be far too many DROPS in queues.

      I don't quite understand what percentages I should use for bandwidth and queue sizes etc, would be great if anybody could point out if there is obvious problems with my shaper:

      ISP Speed:
      70 Mbit/s Download / 18 Mbit/s Upload

      Interfaces:
      WAN + LAN + WLAN

      Queues used for:
      qOthersCritical > single VOIP Phone + 1x radio stream upload
      qOthersHigh > http/s + email + dns
      qOthersLow > torrent p2p

      LAN
      qLink > Priority 2 > Queue limit 1000 > Bandwidth 20%
      qInternet > Bandwidth 65 Mbit/s > Upperlimit m2 65Mb > Link m2 65mb
      qACK > Priority 6 > Bandwidth 20% > Link m2 20%
      qOthersCritical > Priority 7 > Explicit Congestion Notification > Bandwidth 10% > Real m2 320Kb
      qOthersHigh > Priority 5 > Explicit Congestion Notification > Bandwidth 20% > Link m2 20%
      qOthersLow > Priority 4 > Explicit Congestion Notification > Bandwidth 10% > Link m2 10%

      WLAN
      qLink
      qInternet > Bandwidth 32 Mbit/s > Upperlimit m2 32Mb > Link m2 32mb
      qACK > Priority 6 > Bandwidth 20% > Link m2 20%
      qOthersCritical > Priority 7 > Explicit Congestion Notification > Bandwidth 10% > Real m2 320Kb
      qOthersHigh > Priority 5 > Explicit Congestion Notification > Bandwidth 20% > Link m2 20%
      qOthersLow > Priority 4 > Explicit Congestion Notification > Bandwidth 10% > Link m2 10%

      WAN
      qLink > Priority 6 > Explicit Congestion Notification > Bandwidth 20% > Link m2 20%
      qDefault > Priority 4 > Default Queue > Explicit Congestion Notification > Bandwidth 10%
      qOthersCritical > Priority 7 > Explicit Congestion Notification > Bandwidth 10% > Real m2 320Kb
      qOthersHigh > Priority 5 > Explicit Congestion Notification > Bandwidth 20% > Link m2 20%
      qOthersLow > Priority 3 > Explicit Congestion Notification > Bandwidth 10% > Link m2 10%

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        Nullity
        last edited by

        I would simplify it. Just do VOIP & radio on WAN.

        Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
        -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User
          last edited by

          Ok I will give it a go, I will delete all queues apart from WAN. Are there any rules regarding the total amount of bandwidth percentage for all queues per interface? I just made up the percentages so I'm not sure if they are correct.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N
            Nullity
            last edited by

            @wizbit:

            Ok I will give it a go, I will delete all queues apart from WAN. Are there any rules regarding the total amount of bandwidth percentage for all queues per interface? I just made up the percentages so I'm not sure if they are correct.

            Personally, percentages confuse me. I prefer explicit bitrates.
            VOIP, for example, usually uses 64-128Kbit, so allocate approximately (or exactly) that much.
            Radio is probably 128-256Kbit.
            Also, percentages are dynamic, which I do not like.

            If you constantly saturate download, the traffic-shaping is slightly different (than upload), so throwing generic values around will usually not get the results you want.

            If you want to better understand QoS/traffic-shaping, this QoS tutorial is the best I have came across.

            Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
            -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User
              last edited by

              I thought the whole idea of the traffic shaper is to be dynamic otherwise the traffic shaper will be acting like a limiter?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                Nullity
                last edited by

                @wizbit:

                I thought the whole idea of the traffic shaper is to be dynamic otherwise the traffic shaper will be acting like a limiter?

                Let me clarify what I meant.
                Let's say you have a 128Kbit VOIP line and 512Kbit of total interface bandwidth.
                If you set the VOIP queue to 25% (128Kbit), everything is fine.

                Then you switch ISPs and now only have a 256Kbit upload, so you change the interface bandwidth. Now your VOIP queue is 64Kbit. No good.

                If you set actual bitrates, you will not have this problem. HFSC is about precise guarantees and predictabiity.

                Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
                -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User
                  last edited by

                  Right I see what you mean, however, how can I set a bandwidth for http/s as this can depend on how many users are viewing websites, downloading, etc ?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • H
                    Harvy66
                    last edited by

                    At 70Mb/s, the default queue size of 50 is too small. If you're concerned about dropped packets, increase the queue size. even better, enable CoDel as the child disc.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • H
                      Harvy66
                      last edited by

                      Here's what I use at home

                      https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=94831.msg528836#msg528836

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        Nullity
                        last edited by

                        @wizbit:

                        Right I see what you mean, however, how can I set a bandwidth for http/s as this can depend on how many users are viewing websites, downloading, etc ?

                        Technically, you can only fully control traffic that you transmit. QoS/traffic-shaping is most effective on upload traffic. HTTP(S) browsing will primarily be download traffic, which you cannot really prioritize. Actually, downloads (incoming WAN traffic) are only controlled as a side-effect of controlling what the LAN interface is able to transmit.

                        Ultimately, just create VOIP, radio, and bulk/other/default queues on WAN. Apply Codel to the default queue then see if that works. This will solve most problems with upload.

                        Unless you are well-versed in the intricacies of traffic-shaping, I would stick with simple rules and only add additional rules if you have a problem that needs fixing.

                        If you have problems with download bufferbloat, there are a few ways to deal with it, but sadly you are limited because of your multi-LAN setup, because interfaces cannot share bandiwdth… If you had one LAN interface, I would say setup 1 queue on your LAN with a bitrate of 90-98% (lower if traffic is p2p) of your measured download speed and set the queue size to 1 (so it acts like a traffic-policer, rather than a traffic-shaper). That would effectively stop bufferbloat on downloads.

                        With your multi-LAN setup, you would need to do the same as above, but give each interface half of the bandwidth, which is no good...

                        In theory, you could limit the outgoing WAN ACK rate which would limit download rates, but ACK rates are not an exact science, so this is pretty damn hard to configure, requiring a bit of trial and error. It should allow WLAN/LAN to better share the full download bandwidth than the sub-optimal 50/50 split though.

                        Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
                        -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.