Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Ipv6 guidance

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    6 Posts 3 Posters 1.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      grandrivers
      last edited by

      I have 2 wans and one lan prior to ipv6 i have split up which computers went out which wan by using 2 fallover groups and alias and dhcp static mappings to identify

      I added 2 ipv6 tunnels (HE) would still like the ability to push some machines out wan 2 have it setup  so if wan 1 goes down wan 2 picks up using directions from pfsense docs

      I have nor found a good way to do this and maybe its not possible

      I have 3 older andriods on my lan so I set the ra to assisted so they do slac maybe I need to stick with managed

      maybe theres some more things i havent considered ?

      pfsense 2.4 super micro A1SRM-2558F
      C2558 8gig ECC  60gig SSD
      tripple Wan dual pppoe

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • awebsterA
        awebster
        last edited by

        That's a pretty tall order!
        On IPv4 its not such a big issue because pfSense will NAT the internal IP behind whichever WAN interface it is using to send out packets, so replies get back to where the came from and everything works as expected.
        IPv6 on the other hand doesn't work that way because every IPv6 IP is always a real, routable IP.
        The IPv6 pureists shudder at the thought of IPv6 NAT or whatever you want to call it.
        In the end, IPv6 multihoming is a very real problem that doesn't really have a good answer.

        This is a bit dated but describes the problem really well.
        http://blog.ipspace.net/2011/12/ipv6-multihoming-without-nat-problem.html

        I guess this would have to appear somewhere on the pfSense roadmap, but I suspect there is a lot of road to be travelled before it will work "out of the box".

        Edit: I just found this, same question, and guidance!
        https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=105136.0

        –A.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          grandrivers
          last edited by

          yes that guidance seemed to apply mainly as failover would like to load balance and control which machines go out which wans

          pfsense 2.4 super micro A1SRM-2558F
          C2558 8gig ECC  60gig SSD
          tripple Wan dual pppoe

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            You can still do that with the setup described on https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-WAN_for_IPv6

            Match by source and policy route out the other WAN or use a LB/Failover group as desired. The NPt on the second WAN will handle translation. It's not ideal, but it will get the job done.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              grandrivers
              last edited by

              any guidance for the most efficient way to locate certain machines with out physically going to each machine and check its ipv6 address

              pfsense 2.4 super micro A1SRM-2558F
              C2558 8gig ECC  60gig SSD
              tripple Wan dual pppoe

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                Not really. With IPv6 it's quite a bit different and geared toward privacy. You might get lucky and spot the host by its MAC address in the NDP table or catch it in the DHCPv6 leases if it didn't use SLAAC. Otherwise you have to check the client.

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.