Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Problem with DNS forwarding

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    13 Posts 5 Posters 3.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      netsysadmin
      last edited by

      Hello all,

      I'm using pfSense version 2.1.5.
      I'm having an issue with internal DNS resolving, but am not 100% sure the culprit is pfSense.
      Maybe my understanding of the DNS resolution in my setup is not entirely correct.

      Here is how everything is set up:
      1. pfSense DNS forwarder is enabled, with "host overrides" entries for domain mydom.com, for example, sens.mydom.com, which has internal IP 10.40.0.76.
      sens.mydom.com also has a public IP configured on public DNS servers.
      2. I have 2 Mac OS X "Servers" acting as internal DNS servers. All internal machines use the 2 Mac OS X servers as primary and secondary DNS servers. Both these internal DNS servers use the IP address of the pfSense box as forwarding server.
      3. There is no mydom.com zone configured on the internal Mac OS X DNS servers. I have manually added entries in the "host overrides" section of the DNS Resolver in pfSense for a few mydom.com hosts, for example, sens.mydom.com.

      The problem is that when I try to resolve sens.mydom.com from my LAN computer, it gives me the public IP address.
      I thought that the DNS resolution would happen as follows:
      a. my computer would try to get the IP address from the local DNS servers
      b. the zone being inexistent there, the local DNS servers ask the forwarding server, which is pfSense
      c. pfSense has the entry already configured manually and therefore replies to the requester with the internal IP 10.40.0.76..
      d. The problem is that the above steps do not seem to work as I expect. Instead, I am getting the public IP!

      Any help is appreciated.

      Thank you.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by

        so when  you query pfsense directly for the host override you created do you get the correct response or not?

        Use nslookup, dig or host or whatever your fav dns query tool is on the os your using..

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          netsysadmin
          last edited by

          Hello John,

          Thank you for replying.
          Yes, when I query pfSense directly from my LAN computer, I get the correct IP address.

          Please find below the result of the queries:

          mymac:~ user$ nslookup

          sens.mydom.com
          Server: 10.40.0.34
          Address: 10.40.0.34#53

          Non-authoritative answer:
          Name: sens.mydom.com
          Address: A.B.C.D => PUBLIC IP ADDRESS

          server 10.40.0.1 => LAN IP ADDRESS OF pfSense
          Default server: 10.40.0.1
          Address: 10.40.0.1#53

          sens.mydom.com
          Server: 10.40.0.1
          Address: 10.40.0.1#53

          Name: sens.mydom.com
          Address: 10.40.0.76 => CORRECT INTERNAL IP ADDRESS

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cmb
            last edited by

            You have to use the DNS forwarder as your DNS server if you want to get its overrides.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N
              netsysadmin
              last edited by

              Do you mean that all LAN machines should use the IP address of the LAN interface of pfSense as their DNS server?

              Thank you

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                muswellhillbilly
                last edited by

                Why not set your host overrides/split DNS on your Mac DNS servers instead?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  netsysadmin
                  last edited by

                  Actually, that was my last resort, as there will be about 80 DNS records to create manually on the OS X servers, well on the primary DNS server.

                  I think that's what I'll be doing anyway.

                  However, for the sake of my understanding, could anyone explain to me why pfSense was not resolving the FQDN to the internal IP?

                  Thank you

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                    last edited by

                    "why pfSense was not resolving the FQDN to the internal IP?"

                    sure looks like it was to me

                    sens.mydom.com
                    Server:      10.40.0.1
                    Address:  10.40.0.1#53

                    Name:  sens.mydom.com
                    Address: 10.40.0.76 => CORRECT INTERNAL IP ADDRESS

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N
                      netsysadmin
                      last edited by

                      Actually I meant why pfSense was not resolving the FQDN to the internal IP, when the local machines use the Mac OS X servers as DNS servers, the latter pointing to pfSense as forwarding server.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        cmb
                        last edited by

                        @netsysadmin:

                        Actually I meant why pfSense was not resolving the FQDN to the internal IP, when the local machines use the Mac OS X servers as DNS servers, the latter pointing to pfSense as forwarding server.

                        Your shown nslookup results prove the OS X servers aren't actually using the forwarder to provide their answers.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • N
                          netsysadmin
                          last edited by

                          Your shown nslookup results prove the OS X servers aren't actually using the forwarder to provide their answers.

                          Yes I agree, but did not understand why.

                          What I understood is that, if I want to use pfSense's "host overrides", all LAN machines should use pfSense as their DNS server.
                          Using another internal DNS server, even if it is configured to use pfSense as a forwarding server, will not correctly resolve the entries in pfSense's "host overrides".

                          Did I understand correctly?

                          Thank you.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                            last edited by

                            "all LAN machines should use pfSense as their DNS server."

                            Huh???

                            If your internal forwards to pfsense then, any overrides in pfsense would resolve to what you have the host override too.

                            See I created a host override, I setup my windows dns to forward to pfsense..  It resolves the host override I put in pfsense..

                            internaldnsresolvefrompfsenseoverride.png
                            internaldnsresolvefrompfsenseoverride.png_thumb

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              coxhaus
                              last edited by

                              Since you have a local DNS server you can add an A record on your DNS server with the local IP address.  I have done this for a Web server so when you accessed the server from an outside registered DNS name the web server will resolve to an outside IP address from outside and if you are local the local DNS server will resolve the Web server name to a local IP address.

                              Chaining DNS server should work the same way as long as you are local since private IP addresses are not allowed on the internet.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.