Supermicro Intel® Atom™ Processor C2758

Guest

Sounds good, I look forward to some updated figures.
I think everyone would agree that the current hardware sizing guidelines are looking pretty stale. I have suggested some manner of community generated database in the past but it never got much traction.

Steve

We're (finally) working on a documented testing method. This would allow community-generated results to be submitted that could be compared.

stephenw10

Great! :)
I look forward to submitting some numbers from my ancient hardware. ;)

Steve

NTMMFTS

Anyone know if there are any install/driver issues with 2.1.5 or 2.2 with the supermicro c2758 board? I want to build one and just want to be sure of what work I may have to do to get it running. Please share any info you're aware of.

thanks!
Jay.

kroberts

I just ordered a different 2758 board. The intel c2000 processors are oriented toward communications, and the c2*58 processors have QuickAssist. This is hardware acceleration for encryption and compression. These chips are designed to replace larger power hungry servers with smaller atoms in the router/vpn market.

I'm a pfSense n00b but have almost 20 years with Linux. The Linux kernel just got support for quick-assist. Apps don't seem to have it yet. I expect FreeBSD will be at approximately the same state.

The board I ordered supports 64g ecc or non-ecc memory. Surely there's a reason why it supports twice as much as a mainstream i7. Obviously for mainstream uses the atom will be stomped by the i7, but the pfSense use case is exactly what c2*58 processors were designed to do.

Guest

@Asterix:

I haven't tested the C2758s yet but my typical recommendation has always been to go for an i3. There is not much of power saving difference or in other words you won't be a $100 richer after running an atom or other CPU slower than the i3. The processor itself slows down when not required and has the added juice to push snort, dansguardian with clamd, squid and other packages all at the same time.

Wot?

i3-4150 is 54W http://ark.intel.com/products/77486/Intel-Core-i3-4150-Processor-3M-Cache-3_50-GHz

C2758 is 20W http://ark.intel.com/products/77988/Intel-Atom-Processor-C2758-4M-Cache-2_40-GHz?q=c2758

Today, there is probably a slight performance advantage to the i3. Tomorrow you're going to want the cores.

Trust me. You are going to want more cores.

Guest

@kroberts:

I just ordered a different 2758 board. The intel c2000 processors are oriented toward communications, and the c2*58 processors have QuickAssist. This is hardware acceleration for encryption and compression. These chips are designed to replace larger power hungry servers with smaller atoms in the router/vpn market.

C2*58 doesn't mean QuickAssist. See: http://ark.intel.com/compare/77988,77986,77984,77983,77981,77979,81270,77978,77976,81328

@kroberts:

I'm a pfSense n00b but have almost 20 years with Linux. The Linux kernel just got support for quick-assist. Apps don't seem to have it yet. I expect FreeBSD will be at approximately the same state.

The linux kernel got QAT support last Summer. You will never guess who Intel has tapped to do the QAT driver for FreeBSD.

@kroberts:

The board I ordered supports 64g ecc or non-ecc memory. Surely there's a reason why it supports twice as much as a mainstream i7. Obviously for mainstream uses the atom will be stomped by the i7, but the pfSense use case is exactly what c2*58 processors were designed to do.

Have you priced 64GB of ECC ram? :P

jasonlitka

@gonzopancho:

Have you priced 64GB of ECC ram? :P

I haven't managed to find anyone selling 16GB SODIMMs yet…

kroberts

I also had trouble finding 16g sticks but since i need 2 sticks it was more than my target anyway. I got 2x 8g sticks for under USD $200. The non-ecc memory was about $4 a stick cheaper but I don't remember exactly what the memory went for that I bought.

nib01

Please help me decide on this.. C2558 Rangeley has 4 cores, and the C2758 has double up the cores up to 8.

Also, there is a huge price deference between the two.

C2758 Rangeley >> $299
C2558 Rangeley >> $235

Thanks..

Wolf666

@nib01:

Please help me decide on this.. C2558 Rangeley has 4 cores, and the C2758 has double up the cores up to 8.

Also, there is a huge price deference between the two.

C2758 Rangeley >> $299
C2558 Rangeley >> $235

Thanks..

What are your requirements?

nib01

VPN service, Proxy, etc. or I can run VMware esxi 6 using board, and install pfsense on the host and WAN port will be connected to my modem.

Guest

VPN service, Proxy, etc.

What does etc. really means? Squid, Snort, ClamAV, pfBlockerNG, SARG, SquidGuard and DPI on top?
It makes a huge difference.

or I can run VMware esxi 6 using board, and install pfsense on the host and WAN port will be connected to my modem.

Why, I would install pfSense natively on that board and then it will be enough for all your requirements.
For ~$65 more if you are able to get it sorted take and go with the C2758 one.