Any way to install Nano on 2.3?
-
There is also "ee" besides "vi".
-
I feel trapped every time I have to type "vi" or "vim" and then have to fumble for my cheatsheet.
Is there any way to install Nano?Hehe…. Learn it, Live it, Love it :)
http://www.howtogeek.com/102468/a-beginners-guide-to-editing-text-files-with-vi/ -
I feel trapped every time I have to type "vi" or "vim" and then have to fumble for my cheatsheet.
Is there any way to install Nano?Hehe…. Learn it, Live it, Love it :)
http://www.howtogeek.com/102468/a-beginners-guide-to-editing-text-files-with-vi/The only good vi command is :q!
I like Nano. 8)
-
pkg add http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/release_3/All/nano-2.4.3.txz -
pkg add http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/release_3/All/nano-2.4.3.txzPerfect, thanks :)
-
nano has been added to the pfsense pkg repo as a package. very likely it'll be available by simple pkg install from 2.3.1 onwards
https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/641b5618a764f5b6d56ab72eb7095666d37826b9 -
where do you request packages to be added, I think dnstop would also be a useful tool that could be added..
-
where do you request packages to be added, I think dnstop would also be a useful tool that could be added..
no clue. you could start a post in the snapshot section
-
I started a thread asking that pfSense go to a blacklist model rather than this custom whitelist that requires manual effort and review.
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=110853.0
-
nano is available in the package list now, including on 2.3 release. I just added dnstop so that will be available within the next hour or so.
-
@cmb:
nano is available in the package list now, including on 2.3 release. I just added dnstop so that will be available within the next hour or so.
Beautiful, thanks :)
Dyslexia + Vi is not a good combination, heh. -
@cmb:
nano is available in the package list now, including on 2.3 release. I just added dnstop so that will be available within the next hour or so.
Perhaps I am missing it. Where is nano in the package list? I don't see it in the GUI of "available packages". I am on 2.3-RELEASE (amd64).
-
its not in the GUI package list, but it is compiled on the pfSense pkg repo.
it can be installed on console (option 8 ) like:
pkg update pkg install nano -
you will not see it in the gui, it will be available in the pkg install cmd..
[2.3-RELEASE][root@pfSense.local.lan]/root: pkg update
Updating pfSense-core repository catalogue…
pfSense-core repository is up-to-date.
Updating pfSense repository catalogue...
pfSense repository is up-to-date.
All repositories are up-to-date.
[2.3-RELEASE][root@pfSense.local.lan]/root: pkg search dnstop
dnstop-20140915 Captures and analyzes DNS traffic (or analyzes libpcap dump)
[2.3-RELEASE][root@pfSense.local.lan]/root: pkg search nano-
nano-2.4.3 Nano's ANOther editor, an enhanced free Pico cloneYou can get a list here
http://pkg.pfsense.org/pfSense_v2_3_0_amd64-pfSense_v2_3_0/All/
http://pkg.pfsense.org/pfSense_v2_3_0_i386-pfSense_v2_3_0/All/you can view all installed with pkg info
-
@hda:
There is also "ee" besides "vi".
I see a lot of dislike for ee in the BSD world. At the risk of sounding naive, what is it about ee that no one seems to like?
-
I see a lot of dislike for ee in the BSD world. At the risk of sounding naive, what is it about ee that no one seems to like?
Probably mostly a "real sysadmins use <insert traditional="" *nix="" editor="" of="" choice="">" sentiment. Nothing inherently wrong with ee, but some seem to see it as amateur hour. It's not as powerful as vi/emacs/etc. but it's fine for basic needs.</insert>
-
most "real admins" i know don't want nor need an editor…..
they only need a phone(book) and a banana to go "jump monkey, jump!"
-
If you don't know vi maybe try Diagnostics > Edit File??
I say "don't know" because if you knew it you'd love it. :P
-
If you don't know vi maybe try Diagnostics > Edit File??
I say "don't know" because if you knew it you'd love it. :P
Vi is like a smelly hobo. I'm sure it's nice, but from the little bits I've seen of it, I don't want to get to know it.
Besides, this is for use over SSH.
-
@heper Muchas gracias, si funciono
