Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Jetway NF9HG-2930 + Silverstone PT13 Slim ITX

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    30 Posts 14 Posters 15.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      Guest
      last edited by

      I see the SuperMicro case has dropped in cost and may have needed clearance for odd slot. Not quite as cramped but still petite.

      Supermicro SuperChassis CSE-101I
      http://www.ebay.com/itm/191675936807

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        Bandalo
        last edited by

        @wiretap:

        1. A slim fan would probably fit. (15mm thick)
        2. The power consumption test report is listed on Jetway's website for the NF9HG motherboard, available for download.

        Excellent.  I saw the BIOS has good fan-control options, so I think a small fan would be nice to keep the temps and noise low.

        I found that power report shortly after I posted this.  Seems odd that they wouldn't have any specifics in any of their other documentation.  I tested my own board and only saw about 24W total with a full load on the CPU.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          Bandalo
          last edited by

          So my setup with this configuration was running around 50-52C with no fan.  Not terrible, but not too great.  I found a nice PWM controlled Silverstone 120mm slim fan for about $10 online.  Now it sits around 32C and is nearly silent.

          It's a tight fit, but there's clearance.  I think I might simply zip tie the corners down to the lid to keep it from shifting around, but it seems pretty stable.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • W
            wiretap
            last edited by

            Nice  8)

            My pfSense Slim-ITX build: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=95286.0

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              duncane
              last edited by

              Hi,

              I'm interrested in this device.

              Can you tell me what kind of performance should be expected from it?

              Packet/s capacity (if you have tested it), or at least WAN2LAN & LAN2WAN throughtput ?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                Guest
                last edited by

                Can you tell me what kind of performance should be expected from it?

                Capable of 1 GBit/s WAN routing with ease.

                Packet/s capacity (if you have tested it), or at least WAN2LAN & LAN2WAN throughput ?

                Snort or Suricata, Squid & SquidGuard, ClamAV & VPN would be not problem, but please don´t forget,
                all the things you install, like packets, and all services that would be activated, are narrowing down the
                entire speed and also throughput.

                Together with a SSD and a WiFI card or only with a mSATA it would be a really rocking box together with pfSense.
                Available in many different options like shown here in the thread or also only based on the same CPU but more
                professional and more available  in many more countries.
                Jetway NF9HG-2930 Thin mini-ITX Board only
                Ariic New Metal Ant All Aluminum Slim HTPC Mini ITX Media Center Case cool case

                Jetway NF9HG-2930 with 4 x Intel GB LAN Ports
                Jetway Intel N2930 Network PC with 5 x Intel GB LAN Ports

                Axiomtek NA342 Desktop
                Axiomtek NA342R 1U Rackmount with extra module bay in the middle of the front for;

                • VPN module (Intel QuickAssist based)
                • 8 x RJ45 GB LAN module
                • 8 x SFP GB LAN module
                • 4 x PoE RJ45 GB LAN module
                • 4 x SFP+ module
                • 4 x 4 GB LAN Ports & 2 SFP Ports module
                  All modules and Ports are Intel based.
                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  abc123
                  last edited by

                  For the Jetway NF9HG-2930
                  which port are you using as WAN
                  there are two ports tied together if you make that your LAN do you lose throughput?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ?
                    Guest
                    last edited by

                    which port are you using as WAN

                    One of the both that are not tied together.

                    there are two ports tied together if you make that your LAN do you lose throughput?

                    No I don´t lose LAN speed then, but this could also be owed to the circumstance that I am using a
                    Layer3 switch that is delivering nearly wire speed in the entire LAN (VLAN) environment.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      edwardwong
                      last edited by

                      All 4 LAN ports are the same on NF9HG-2930, there is a brother of this board named NF9HB-2930 which is almost the same, except the 2 LAN ports tied together which have a special feature called "LAN bypass", so free to take any port to use.

                      @abc123:

                      For the Jetway NF9HG-2930
                      which port are you using as WAN
                      there are two ports tied together if you make that your LAN do you lose throughput?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • E
                        edwardwong
                        last edited by

                        For my build with NF9HG-2930, I give up the Silverstone case and used the M350 case (setup here), I never use any fan, and while my room temperature rises to 30-35 degree, the heat of router is still acceptable under loading.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T
                          TacticalKarma Banned
                          last edited by TacticalKarma

                          This post is deleted!
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • QuentineQ
                            Quentine Banned
                            last edited by

                            This post is deleted!
                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.