Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Pfsync kernel panic after 2.1.5 to 2.2 to Upgrade - pfsync_undefer_state

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
    73 Posts 13 Posters 23.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L Offline
      lowprofile
      last edited by

      So this issue has not been fixed in 2.2.2 ?  :(

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        Marlenio
        last edited by

        Yes, it seems to be fixed. CARP working, limiter too, and cpu load in MASTER server is very low.  :)

        Marlenio

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S Offline
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Interesting. I'm not aware of any specific fixes that have gone in for this since the earlier snapshots. Perhaps something else was causing the issue.
          I'm sure we'll see many more reports in the next few days to condom or deny this.

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            Marlenio
            last edited by

            Two CARP upgraded (each one with two server), the first yesterday, the last one today. Works without problems: low CPU, CARP without error and log spam, and the back CARP with limiter on bandwidth. I don't know why, but 2.2.2 really works.  :)

            Marlenio

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              Marlenio
              last edited by

              In 2.2.2 there is still a problem i found in 2.2.1, as i said before: on limited rules, i need to unchek  the flag "State Type" to "NO pfsync". If i don't, CARP Slave randomly crash.
              As i said before, in my CARP configuration limited rules are only HTTP and HTTPS: the state is not really important for me. However, 2.2.2 it is much better than 2.2.1.  :)

              Marlenio

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T Offline
                tdale
                last edited by

                Fixed all my issues! I made my limiter rules, set them to 10Mbps, applied the firewall and did a test :)

                [omitted@omitted ~]# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
                –2015-04-16 14:02:53--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
                Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
                Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
                HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
                Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
                Saving to: “100mb.test.7”

                100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 1.18M/s  in 89s

                2015-04-16 14:04:21 (1.13 MB/s) - “100mb.test.7” saved [104857600/104857600]

                I tested it a few times :)

                THANK YOU!!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • O Offline
                  ondrej
                  last edited by

                  Please is there any progress? I am also still having problems with this bug.
                  Thanks

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S Offline
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Have you tried a 2.2.3 snapshot, if you are able to?
                    There have been fixes gone in to address this though it seems not all cases have been resolved. Some here have reported success.

                    Steve

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • L Offline
                      lshiry
                      last edited by

                      I sent a couple crash logs for this yesterday.  This is on version 2.2.4.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S Offline
                        SteveITS Rebel Alliance
                        last edited by

                        Interesting to find this thread.  We didn't have this issue until upgrading from 2.2.6 to 2.3.1_5.  It does look like it is logged during a nightly copy that triggers a limiter, ending when the traffic stops.

                        Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                        When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to reboot, or more depending on packages, and device or disk speed.
                        Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S Offline
                          SteveITS Rebel Alliance
                          last edited by

                          In 2.3.1 there is a checkbox "No pfSync" on the rule, but checking that doesn't avoid the error message.  Nor does setting "State type" to None.

                          I can duplicate by simply using "rsync –dry-run" so it's not like it needs a lot of traffic.

                          Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                          When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to reboot, or more depending on packages, and device or disk speed.
                          Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A Offline
                            AngelG
                            last edited by

                            I upgrade to 2.3.3 and kermel entry "pfsync_undefer_state: unable to find deferred state" in log persist. Any existing or planned solutions?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S Offline
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              No direct cause has yet been found as far as I know.

                              Obviously we would like to resolve it as soon as possible.

                              https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4310

                              Steve

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.