Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Relayd - and fall back pool on different port

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved HA/CARP/VIPs
    1 Posts 1 Posters 1.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • _ Offline
      __nicolas__
      last edited by

      Hello :)
      I did not find any items about my problem.

      I am configuring a load balancer policy with 2 pools: an "active" and a fallback.
      The active pool is configured on port 80
      The fallback pool is on port 8080.

      The fallback pool is down, an not packet are issued by relayd checks (verified by tcpdump).
      The active pool is working as expected (checks on port 80).

      The configuration for relayd is:

      log updates
      timeout 1000
      table <web-frontend>{
      10.6.0.5
      10.6.0.6
      10.6.0.7
      10.6.0.8
      10.6.0.9
      10.6.0.10
      10.6.0.11
      10.6.0.12
      10.6.0.13
      10.6.0.14
      10.6.0.15
      10.6.0.16
      10.6.0.17
      10.6.0.18
      10.6.0.19
      10.6.0.20
      10.6.0.21
      10.6.0.22
      10.6.0.23
      10.6.0.24
      10.6.0.25
      10.6.0.26
      10.6.0.27
      10.6.0.28
      10.6.0.29
      10.6.0.30
      }
      table <web-master>{
      10.6.0.3
      }
      dns protocol "dnsproto" {
      tcp { nodelay, sack, socket buffer 1024, backlog 1000 }
      }
      redirect "Elections" {
        listen on 1.2.3.4 port 80
        forward to <web-frontend>port 80 check http '/municipales/'  code 200
        forward to <web-master>port 80 check http '/municipales/'  code 200
      }</web-master></web-frontend></web-master></web-frontend>

      I attach a screen capture of the pool configuration.
      As you can see, web-master is configured as port 80, not 8080 …

      Is it a known bug, a dumb configuration or something new ?

      Thanks for you help
      Regards,
      Nicolas

      EDIT: I am using version 2.1 release
      relayd-pool.png
      relayd-pool.png_thumb

      Nicolas

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • First post
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.