PfSense i7-4510U + 2x Intel 82574 + 2x Intel i350 (miniPCIE) Mini-ITX Build

Paint

Hi,

What was the cost of the PC & what sort of wattage is being used?

THanks,
Rich

Not sure about the wattage, but can test. It if it's really that important.

The machine with the switch was 350 uad

duren

@mauroman33:

Hi Paint,

could you please run the simple OpenVPN benchmark referenced here:
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=105238.msg616743#msg616743 (Reply #9 message)

Executing the command on my router with a Celeron N3150 I get
27.41 real 25.62 user 1.77 sys

(3200 / 27.41) = 117 Mbps OpenVPN performance (estimate)

This value perfectly fits to the result of a real speed test.

I recently got an upgrade to 250/100 connection and I'm considering buying a mini PC as your own if it were able to sustain this speed through the OpenVPN connection.

Thanks!

Here is the output:
[2.3.1-RELEASE][root@pfSense.lan]/root: openvpn --genkey --secret /tmp/secret
[2.3.1-RELEASE][root@pfSense.lan]/root: time openvpn --test-crypto --secret /tmp/secret --verb 0 --tun-mtu 20000 --cipher aes-256-cbc
10.682u 0.677s 0:11.36 99.9%    742+177k 0+0io 1pf+0w
[2.3.1-RELEASE][root@pfSense.lan]/root:
(3200 / 11.36) = 281.7 Mbps OpenVPN performance (estimate)

wow, I'm a little surprised, I would have thought an i7-4500U would be able to do more than ~300mbps over vpn.

I'm assuming this is without AES-NI? I'd be very curious to know the throughput when it's finally here as part of OpenVPN 2.4 (https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=109539.0)

Paint

@duren:

@Paint:
@mauroman33:

Hi Paint,

could you please run the simple OpenVPN benchmark referenced here:
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=105238.msg616743#msg616743 (Reply #9 message)

Executing the command on my router with a Celeron N3150 I get
27.41 real 25.62 user 1.77 sys

(3200 / 27.41) = 117 Mbps OpenVPN performance (estimate)

This value perfectly fits to the result of a real speed test.

I recently got an upgrade to 250/100 connection and I'm considering buying a mini PC as your own if it were able to sustain this speed through the OpenVPN connection.

Thanks!

Here is the output:
[2.3.1-RELEASE][root@pfSense.lan]/root: openvpn --genkey --secret /tmp/secret
[2.3.1-RELEASE][root@pfSense.lan]/root: time openvpn --test-crypto --secret /tmp/secret --verb 0 --tun-mtu 20000 --cipher aes-256-cbc
10.682u 0.677s 0:11.36 99.9%    742+177k 0+0io 1pf+0w
[2.3.1-RELEASE][root@pfSense.lan]/root:
(3200 / 11.36) = 281.7 Mbps OpenVPN performance (estimate)
wow, I'm a little surprised, I would have thought an i7-4500U would be able to do more than ~300mbps over vpn.

I'm assuming this is without AES-NI? I'd be very curious to know the throughput when it's finally here as part of OpenVPN 2.4 (https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=109539.0)

That test is relatively theoretical.

The processor does support AES-NI. I have made some additional tweaks and plan on adding an additional ethernet port via a Jetway i350 intel chipset minipci board.

I will run some more in depth tests tomorrow.

Paint

@duren:

@Paint:
@mauroman33:

Hi Paint,

could you please run the simple OpenVPN benchmark referenced here:
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=105238.msg616743#msg616743 (Reply #9 message)

Executing the command on my router with a Celeron N3150 I get
27.41 real 25.62 user 1.77 sys

(3200 / 27.41) = 117 Mbps OpenVPN performance (estimate)

This value perfectly fits to the result of a real speed test.

I recently got an upgrade to 250/100 connection and I'm considering buying a mini PC as your own if it were able to sustain this speed through the OpenVPN connection.

Thanks!

Here is the output:
[2.3.1-RELEASE][root@pfSense.lan]/root: openvpn --genkey --secret /tmp/secret
[2.3.1-RELEASE][root@pfSense.lan]/root: time openvpn --test-crypto --secret /tmp/secret --verb 0 --tun-mtu 20000 --cipher aes-256-cbc
10.682u 0.677s 0:11.36 99.9%    742+177k 0+0io 1pf+0w
[2.3.1-RELEASE][root@pfSense.lan]/root:
(3200 / 11.36) = 281.7 Mbps OpenVPN performance (estimate)
wow, I'm a little surprised, I would have thought an i7-4500U would be able to do more than ~300mbps over vpn.

I'm assuming this is without AES-NI? I'd be very curious to know the throughput when it's finally here as part of OpenVPN 2.4 (https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=109539.0)

I ran this test again with my CPU set to MAX (hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest="Cmax") and AES-NI CPU-based Acceleration. I also have SNORT + Barnyard2 running with pfBlockerNG.
Here is a full list of my services: avahi, dhcpd, dnsbl, dpinger, miniupnpd, ntopng, ntpd, openvpn, radvd, snort, sshd, and unbound

[2.3.2-DEVELOPMENT][root@pfSense.lan]/root: openvpn --genkey --secret /tmp/secret
[2.3.2-DEVELOPMENT][root@pfSense.lan]/root: time openvpn --test-crypto --secret /tmp/secret --verb 0 --tun-mtu 20000 --cipher aes-256-cbc
10.106u 0.558s 0:10.67 99.8%    743+178k 0+0io 0pf+0w

(3200 / 10.67) = 299.9 Mbps OpenVPN performance (estimate)

Paint

I tested my OpenVPN connection through work with iperf:

Server:

iperf.exe -s -u -p 5123 -i 5 -w 64K -P 100

Client:

iperf.exe -c 192.168.1.50 -u -p 5123 -b 5000m -i 5 -t 120 -w 64K -P 100

I was able to get the following averages:

pfcode

Hi,

I saw you have pfBlockerNG, IPv6, unbound running, Do you use DNSBL? if so, Do you have any issue that unbound isn't restarted properly with IPv6/DNSBL running each time pfSense IPv6 WAN IP got renewed (in fact, the IP isn't changed at all)? see also: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=113193.0

Paint

@pfcode:

Hi,

I saw you have pfBlockerNG, IPv6, unbound running, Do you use DNSBL? if so, Do you have any issue that unbound isn't restarted properly with IPv6/DNSBL running each time pfSense IPv6 WAN IP got renewed (in fact, the IP isn't changed at all)? see also: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=113193.0

Yes, i am also running DNSBL.

I haven't noticed any unbound restarts on WAN dhcp renewals. FiOS hadn't switched to DHCPv6, so I am only using DHCPv4 for my WAN and a 6to4 HE. Net Tunnel GIF

Paint

@pfcode:

Hi,

I saw you have pfBlockerNG, IPv6, unbound running, Do you use DNSBL? if so, Do you have any issue that unbound isn't restarted properly with IPv6/DNSBL running each time pfSense IPv6 WAN IP got renewed (in fact, the IP isn't changed at all)? see also: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=113193.0

I actually experienced this issue last night! I will post in the thread you mentioned about the issue. thank you!

Paint

I am still getting the Watchdog Queue Timeout on the em0 driver once in a while so I decided to upgrade my ethernet to the Intel i350 chipset.

Jetway is the only company producing a Mini-PCI card that has this server based Intel Ethernet chipset - ADMPEIDLB - http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/spec/expansion/ADMPEIDLB.pdf

I was able to speak to someone in their California headquarters (her name was Angel) and purchased this board for $75 shipped! It arrives on Thursday, so I will let everyone know updated Ethernet performance figures.

Paint

recently fixed my serial console by adding the following to my /boot/loader.conf.local:

comconsole_port="0x2F8"
hint.uart.0.flags="0x0"
hint.uart.1.flags="0x10"

as well as the following settings in the GUI:

Serial.PNG_thumb

Paint

I added a Jetway Mini-PCIe Intel i350 ADMPEIDLB 2x Gigabit adapter to this machine.
The em(4) freebsd driver used with the on-board 2x Intel 82574 adapters would cause watchdog timeouts every 2-3 days.

The Intel i350 ADMPEIDLB 2x Gigabit adapter uses the igb driver, which is much more stable.
I ran some iperf tests from my HTPC - which also has a 4x i350 Intel Ethernet adapter in it - and my laptop (wireless AC) at the same time. I was able to fully saturate both adapters to gigabit speeds while also maintaining my 150/150 outbound WAN. For my setup, this adapter works perfectly!

I ordered the ADMPEIDLB board for $75 + s/h directly from Jetway. They have 3 more in stock, I believe (talk to Angel on the phone, tell them Josh sent you if you want one).
http://www.jetwayipc.com/content/?ADMPEIDLB_3450.html

I updated my thread with my loader.conf.local and sysctl.conf settings: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=113610.msg637025#msg637025

To install the board, I removed one of the 6 UART COM ports that this machine originally came with. I was able to route the wires through that hole and Velcro the board (without the PCI bracket) to the side of the machine. Looks pretty good for a home built machine, if you ask me!

20160728_183755.jpg_thumb

20160728_184318.jpg_thumb