Hardware check: PPPoE gigabit
-
I like it. Why is em preferred over igb for PPPoE? Just curious.
-
PPPoE WAN with high speeds + pfSense == single driver queue (with igp driver):
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4821Not likely to get 'fixed' anytime soon, so I'm prepping to deal with it for the long haul with older NICs that use the em driver (doesn't seem to be affected by this limitation).
-
Any updates? Did you proceed with this build? Here's my pfSense hardware. I built this before I got CenturyLink's (CL) Gigabit. Now I'm on CL and looking to remove the provided Modem/Router.
CPU/MOBO/NIC: http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/Mini-ITX/SYS-E200-9B.cfm
RAM: 8GB DDR3
HDD: 64GB SSD
HP Managed Switch: HP 1810-24G, PL.2.04
Ran test on W10, NUC 5th Gen, i3, 16GB RAM
Test results: Ping (Lowest): 2.98 ms | Download (Max): 468.13 Mbps | Upload (Max): 407.21 MbpsProvided CL hardware, ZyXEL C1100Z -> connected to PAN-200
HP Managed Switch: HP 1810-24G, PL.2.04
Ran test on W10, NUC 5th Gen, i3, 16GB RAM
Test results: Ping (Lowest): 2.00 ms | Download (Max): 932.87 Mbps | Upload (Max): 670.65 MbpsHP Managed Switch > vlan.201 = CL drop
HP Managed Switch > vlan.201 = PAN-200
PAN cannot authenticate Layer3 PPPoEI'm moving forward with pfSense, due to VLAN-tagged PPPoE capabilities. Just need to find the right hardware.
-
I'll chime in here:
I've got CL fiber here near West Seattle. Have the latest pfsense running on a SG-8860 (RCC-VE 8860). With the pf box behind the CL 2100t modem/router, I can saturate the full gigabit. If I eliminate the 2100t and do PPPoE over vlan201 directly from the pf box, I get at best 600/600. Since FreeBSD does PPPoE single threaded, I think clock speed is the limiting factor.
Right now, I'm running the 2100t with my pf box in the dmz so I can get full speed and still have pf features/control.
-
FWIW I asked this question previously and didnt get any replies. I've tried all manner of consumer routers and a bunch of other distros and nothing besides a router with an ASIC for PPPoe offload has worked. I'm currently using a ubiquiti ER5-POE instead of the C2100t, which is a beast of an all in one.
-
I suspect this person getting a good up/down speed, but getting high latency (see link)…
https://kdemaria.wordpress.com/2015/04/22/how-to-configure-pfsense-2-2-2-for-centurylink-gigabit-seattle-edition/
So I'm unsure about deploying pfSense, even on an em NIC driver, and high CPU and RAM resources. Hoping that someone here, have already done it.I'm not sure about OP. End-game for me, is to remove any CL provided device. Deploy my own stateful (at least next-gen FW), as the only routable device. Since my Palo Alto gear (ASIC) doesn't have the VLAN-tagged PPPoE capabilities. I just bought an HP NC364T from ebay. As soon as this arrives, I'll see about testing this on my spare box.
-
Sorry, I've held off on building this as I've seen some other 'issues' with PPPOE reported by some users that would affect my setup (specifically, having a dual WAN setup, one being DHCP)… it almost seems like waiting for a 3.x pfSense makes more sense for CL gigabit :/
-
many of us are wating for an update on this :(
performance is damn low. i have fiber link gigabit and i barely get 500 on pppoe -
No change on the latest version of pfSense, version 2.3.2. I proceeded with a brand new Juniper SRX300 for $200. Got my vlan tagged PPPoE working, on a same speed as CenturyLink provided modem.
-
Bug has been open 1 year ago. Not much progress on this by now. Hope in the new major version to get some improvements.
