Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Hardware for gigabit internet

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    22 Posts 9 Posters 7.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jalyst
      last edited by

      @demannu:

      bump

      Just to update everyone and to help all the googlers out there :)

      Check the my signature for hardware config and results.

      Lucky bugger…

      It that typical for Kiwi connections, or way above what you usually get there?
      Surely that'd cost you a fortune? What's your data quota?
      Can only dream of that in my inner-city suburb of Brisbane, bloody pathetic.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        demannu
        last edited by

        @jalyst:

        Lucky bugger…

        It that typical for Kiwi connections, or way above what you usually get there?
        Surely that'd cost you a fortune? What's your data quota?
        Can only dream of that in my inner-city suburb of Brisbane, bloody pathetic.

        Its starting to become the norm, theres pretty good fibre to the door coverage in NZ now due to the nation wide role out due to be completed 2019

        I'm with one of the bigger more expensive ISP's here in NZ, Orcon. I pay $140 a month for 1000/500, unlimited data cap and VOIP services with all the addons.. caller ID, divert, voicemail, conference calling etc they send you a "free" $400NZD router called fritzbox 3940 but i'm sure its bundled into the price.. a zero throttling ISP as well.

        Gigabit fibre plans start from $99 unlimited, pretty much all of the ISP's here price you into unlimited as its usually only $10 more than their base plans of 80-100GB

        But yeah its hardcase, theres still some CBD'ish places here in Auckland that don't have fibre to their door yet but there's tiny little towns in the middle of nowhere that have full coverage and only 20% uptake

        I get about 850/350~ to the Sydney telstra speed test server and 750/350~ to Brisbane

        i3 3225 3.3GHZ
        8GB DDR3
        ASRock h77m
        60GB SSD
        Intel Pro/1000 PT Quad Port
        pfSense 2.3.2
        Fibre connection 1000/500

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jalyst
          last edited by

          Ugh, so annoying that our NBN turned into such a political basket-case, if it hadn't, a large chunk of us would be having FTTH by now, instead of the BS "mixed services" approach we're now lumped with. Which was promised to be much faster to roll-out, & much cheaper, it has been a total fail in that regard, so why the hell didn't they just go FTTH all the way (for the most built-up areas only ofc).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            messerchmidt
            last edited by

            intel nics

            i5 or i7 setup with 16gb ram

            the supermicro atom c2758 is still a popular pick

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Q
              Qhris_
              last edited by

              Hello,

              i am using an XEON E3-1225 V3 and HyperV with PFsense as VM, but I am not reaching the Gigabit :(
              Network adapter is HP NC365T Quad-Port 4x 1 Gbps.

              But Speed stucks at this Point:

              Any idea?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                demannu
                last edited by

                Its quite possible its due to the NIC you are using.

                People have experience gigabit performance issues using the IGB intel drivers

                The card I'm using uses the EM drivers

                List of IGB driver chipsets (your card is using the 82580 chipset)

                https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=igb&apropos=0&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+11-current&format=html

                List of EM driver chipsets (my card uses the 82571 chipset)

                https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=em&sektion=4&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+11-current

                I also went one step further and put a intel 1340-t2 NIC into my PC to make sure I was getting the best possible performance

                i3 3225 3.3GHZ
                8GB DDR3
                ASRock h77m
                60GB SSD
                Intel Pro/1000 PT Quad Port
                pfSense 2.3.2
                Fibre connection 1000/500

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  demannu
                  last edited by

                  @jalyst:

                  Ugh, so annoying that our NBN turned into such a political basket-case, if it hadn't, a large chunk of us would be having FTTH by now, instead of the BS "mixed services" approach we're now lumped with. Which was promised to be much faster to roll-out, & much cheaper, it has been a total fail in that regard, so why the hell didn't they just go FTTH all the way (for the most built-up areas only ofc).

                  Hah, yeah I heard about it all going belly up over there and it turning to "fibre to the node" instead.. what a rubbish idea..

                  Friend of mine living in Melbourne is a bit of a conspirator and reckons Murdoch had a lot to do with it because he was worried about streamers and didn't want his empire to come crashing down around him.

                  i3 3225 3.3GHZ
                  8GB DDR3
                  ASRock h77m
                  60GB SSD
                  Intel Pro/1000 PT Quad Port
                  pfSense 2.3.2
                  Fibre connection 1000/500

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Q
                    Qhris_
                    last edited by

                    @demannu:

                    Its quite possible its due to the NIC you are using.

                    People have experience gigabit performance issues using the IGB intel drivers

                    The card I'm using uses the EM drivers

                    List of IGB driver chipsets (your card is using the 82580 chipset)

                    https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=igb&apropos=0&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+11-current&format=html

                    List of EM driver chipsets (my card uses the 82571 chipset)

                    https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=em&sektion=4&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+11-current

                    I also went one step further and put a intel 1340-t2 NIC into my PC to make sure I was getting the best possible performance

                    Interesting point.
                    To disprove that argument I have just installed Iperf on HyperV and Lan Client and speed is ~950 Mbit/s

                    Could the NIC still be the guilty thing?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      demannu
                      last edited by

                      I missed out something important in my original post..

                      If you're using PPPoE, PPPoE isn't able to utilize all driver queues at high speeds using IGB, in your case, gigabit.

                      https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4821

                      As far as I can tell this isn't a problem with EM drivers.

                      i3 3225 3.3GHZ
                      8GB DDR3
                      ASRock h77m
                      60GB SSD
                      Intel Pro/1000 PT Quad Port
                      pfSense 2.3.2
                      Fibre connection 1000/500

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jalyst
                        last edited by

                        @demannu:

                        @jalyst:

                        Ugh, so annoying that our NBN turned into such a political basket-case, if it hadn't, a large chunk of us would be having FTTH by now, instead of the BS "mixed services" approach we're now lumped with. Which was promised to be much faster to roll-out, & much cheaper, it has been a total fail in that regard, so why the hell didn't they just go FTTH all the way (for the most built-up areas only ofc).

                        Hah, yeah I heard about it all going belly up over there and it turning to "fibre to the node" instead.. what a rubbish idea..

                        Friend of mine living in Melbourne is a bit of a conspirator and reckons Murdoch had a lot to do with it because he was worried about streamers and didn't want his empire to come crashing down around him.

                        No one to blame but Liberal's Tony Abbott & his inner cohort, & their extreme opposition to everything while in opposition, worked masterfully for a while & helped his star to rise, but that whole style/approach came back to haunt him, & was ultimately his demise. And the more moderate Liberal Malcolm Turnbull just had to run with it all, & run with it he did, by birthing what TA initially conceptualised, a highly flawed system that will actually cost us more in the long run (despite their rhetoric), when we find we have to re-upgrade large sections.

                        But we digress, sorry.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.