Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Tinc package on 2.3

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    41 Posts 15 Posters 15.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T Offline
      tguldener
      last edited by

      Whats the status here? Will be TINC one time again a official PFSense Package? I follow the installation instruction for 3 firewalls - one working fine, on the two others with the same installations not. I haven't any TINC entry under VPN.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V Offline
        Vetal
        last edited by

        @tguldener:

        Whats the status here? Will be TINC one time again a official PFSense Package? I follow the installation instruction for 3 firewalls - one working fine, on the two others with the same installations not. I haven't any TINC entry under VPN.

        I installed on 5 firewalls, all worked smooth

        And yesterday, I've guided one case. It didn't work. Mistake was, "pkg add" was called from pfSense UI, the way I never used myself

        Doing it the common way I did, via ssh with

        sudo pkg add -f ...

        Fixed the situation. Precondition: sudo package must be installed

        If you tried with gui, you can try with putty or ssh, just do not forget '-f' to force reinstall

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • I Offline
          ioiioi
          last edited by

          I have a question about tinc HA, I got two pfsense box setup and implement active/passive, any possbile to implement tinc as active/passive way?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L Offline
            lockheed
            last edited by

            @dmegyesi:

            Hi,

            I believe it should work basically on any architecture, the package I prepared is not hard-wired for anything special, it just depends on the tinc package itself. As long as the original package is available for i386, I think it should work. I don't have such a system to test though.

            I think it doesn't:

            pkg add https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4512442/pfSense-pkg-tinc-1.0.28.txz
Fetching pfSense-pkg-tinc-1.0.28.txz: 100%   18 KiB  18.3kB/s    00:01    
Installing pfSense-pkg-tinc-1.0.28...
pkg: wrong architecture: FreeBSD:10:amd64 instead of FreeBSD:10:i386

Failed to install the following 1 package(s): https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4512442/pfSense-pkg-tinc-1.0.28.txz

            Any ideas how to install it on a 32bit system?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • V Offline
              Vetal
              last edited by

              Great news, indeed, there is a progress.

              dmegyesi, thank you for your work and persistence!

              As for, "Added to 2.4.0 and 2.3.3 snapshots, after more testing it can be added to 2.3.2. Thanks!"

              I assume, it will be some new release, like "2.3.2-RELEASE-p2" with a tinc included, right?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Y Offline
                yodaphone
                last edited by

                I'm runnig my PFsense on an old Watchguard x750.

                Now I have successfully installed tinc, but how can I get a webinterface for tinc?

                :(

                now upload the pfSense-pkg-tinc-1.0.28 via Diagnostics -> Command Prompt

                then run pkg add /tmp/pfSense-pkg-tinc-1.0.28.txz

                restart the box & you should see the menu

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Y Offline
                  yodaphone
                  last edited by

                  @PiBa:

                  Hi dmegyesi,

                  I gave it a quick little check on 1 pfSense test machine (without actually connecting anywhere) as i'm not actively using tinc. So i have not fully tested its workings, but my guess is you have already done that.

                  From what i see it looks valid except you should indeed drop 'tincd' binary from the pfSense package 'makefile' the package dependency will indeed take care of that.

                  For testing i used "pkg add http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/release_3/All/tinc-1.0.26_1.txz" to add that package from the FreeBSD repository.. I suppose i could have used http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/All/tinc-1.0.28.txz as well.. But anyway package looks like i remember it from 2.2 and tincd daemon seems to be properly started with some basic configurations.

                  If you can send  pullrequest on github that would be great :) (dont forget to sign the 2 pfSense contributer licence agreements)

                  Regards,
                  PiBa-NL

                  i tried to install the tinc-1.0.28.txz but i got this error (alos with tinc-1.0.29.txz)

                  pkg: Missing dependency 'openssl'

                  strange but openssl is very much a part of pfsense

                  Then i installed tinc-1.0.26_1.txz & it worked.

                  Any ideas why?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    PiBa
                    last edited by

                    Probably because your not 'supposed' to install stuff from the freebsd repositories.. pfSense has its own repository with all binaries of ports that are made available for use on pfSense. I dont think tinc is currently part of that list though.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D Offline
                      doktornotor Banned
                      last edited by

                      tinc is available on 2.3.3 and 2.4. No need to do any such hacks like installing from non-pfSense repos.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P Offline
                        PiBa
                        last edited by

                        Oh it is :o ,i thought is was 'rejected' because of undefined issues. I was wrong and should have re-checked before writing assuming that to still be valid because people where still trying to install manually. Thanks for the correction :D.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D Offline
                          doktornotor Banned
                          last edited by

                          Everything got sorted out eventually - https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/149

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Y Offline
                            yodaphone
                            last edited by

                            @doktornotor:

                            Everything got sorted out eventually - https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/149

                            any chance of this being part of 2.3.2?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.