• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Hardware recommendation on 150mbps/10mbps?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
8 Posts 3 Posters 1.4k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N
    newabc
    last edited by Mar 8, 2017, 2:47 AM Mar 8, 2017, 12:12 AM

    I works in a small company.

    Current setup:

    18mbps download/1mbps upload
    12-14 workstations, 6-8 wifi devices.

    Atom D525
    2GB RAM
    5 intel gigabit ports
    120 GB SSD
    unifi access point

    pfSense with FreeRADIUS 2
    No IDS/IPS/Squid

    The coming setup:
    150mbps download/10mbps upload
    20 workstations, 10-12 wifi devices.

    pfSense with FreeRADIUS 2, Suricata IDS(monitor 3-4 vlans)
    No Squid

    Any hardware recommendation for pfSense? Budget under $900 and it should be power saving.

    Currently I am very interesting with Qotom J1900/3215u box, but I do know it has no enough power.

    Thanks a lot.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by Mar 8, 2017, 12:57 AM

      No VPNs?

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        newabc
        last edited by Mar 8, 2017, 12:58 AM

        No VPNs

        Thanks for your reply.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by Mar 8, 2017, 1:08 AM

          Then your requirements are modest.

          I would expect our SG-2440 to handle that without any issues for example.
          https://store.pfsense.org/SG-2440/

          You might want to test it with the hardware you already have to be sure need to upgrade yet.

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N
            newabc
            last edited by Mar 8, 2017, 2:41 AM

            @stephenw10:

            Then your requirements are modest.

            I would expect our SG-2440 to handle that without any issues for example.
            https://store.pfsense.org/SG-2440/

            You might want to test it with the hardware you already have to be sure need to upgrade yet.

            Steve

            Thanks for the recommendation at first.

            But I knew suricata is a CPU/RAM hunger application(a little bit more than snort.) So I said celeron J1900/3215u may have not enough power for this.

            I tried snort on 1 vlan with IDS mode. Atom D525/2G ram failed to react for loging-in with ssh temperately when starting/stopping monitoring on that interface and RAM usage almost full comparing to 10%-20% usage without snort. 4GB RAM may be not enough.

            Also, the "Atom C2xxx LPC failures" title is quit scary even some of the users haven't met the failure.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by Mar 8, 2017, 6:13 PM

              Snort/Suricata can eat a ton of RAM but they should not use that much if configured correctly.

              If you just enable all the signatures then they might use >2GB but you almost certainly don't need them all.

              Steve

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                pfBasic Banned
                last edited by Mar 9, 2017, 4:11 PM

                J3455B and an i340-t4 (if you need four ports), very cheap and low power(especially if you get an eBay server pull NIC). If you want to install 2.4.0 Beta you can even install to a USB flash drive(s).

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  newabc
                  last edited by Mar 10, 2017, 5:38 AM

                  If I don't consider power saving, Jetway NF592-Q170 motherboard recommended by some threads of hardware board may be a very comfortable choice.

                  Here is a bare-bone with i5-6500 cpu.
                  http://mitxpc.com/proddetail.php?prod=RS-JNF592VI5-FIO

                  By the way, I tried a vlan with much less hosts than previous and cut down a lot of signatures as what Steve suggested. Then got much less CPU/RAM usage in the old machine. Thank you, Steve.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  8 out of 8
                  • First post
                    8/8
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                    This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                    consent.not_received