Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPv6 setup issues

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    17 Posts 3 Posters 4.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      seArs
      last edited by

      At first, thank you for your reply, though it seems like you didn't read my post through at all…

      @bimmerdriver:

      Depending on your ISP, it shouldn't be difficult to get ipv6 working. Start with default settings wherever possible.

      As I said my IPv6 setup already is working. So there is no need to start from scratch again.

      @bimmerdriver:

      […] and some ISP require do not wait for RA. Don't set it unless you know you need to. […]

      That's one of the problems I had before updating pfsense to 2.3.3 p1. No problem anymore since I now have a working config with dhcpv6 an WAN.

      @bimmerdriver:

      […] This field pads the delegated prefix by up to 8 bits to make it a /64.

      No, it simply doesn't. At least not in my case. It pads the prefix, but that doesn't make it /64.

      This is what happens:
      I request a /60 from my ISP and I get a /60. I track the WAN in the LAN Settings and give it an ID from 0 to f, doesn't matter which, they all behave the same.
      Result:
      LAN interface configures itself with a /60 address. And that exactly is my problem. The padding happens, but the prefix length doesn't change.

      Long story short:

      1. Setup is working, but only with static IPs on the pfsense box.
      2. DHCPv6 isn't my problem. It's blocked through BBN rule and I just think this shouldn't be like this.
      3. Tracking WAN interface doesn't do subnetting. Padding happens, but prefix length stays the same.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        bimmerdriver
        last edited by

        I read your post. I think you need to re-read mine. If you want help, post your wan, lan, dhcp6 configurations.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DerelictD
          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
          last edited by

          My guess is that the interfaces should pick their (new) prefix length by choosing the prefix ID in the interface tracking option.
          But how would this work if I would like to subnet to /61 /62 or /63?

          Interfaces get a /64.

          To put anything else on an interface is nonsense.

          If you want to delegate prefixes to downstream routers you should be starting with at least a /48 and delegating /56 or /60.

          You will need to post your config as has already been requested. Everyone else using track interface is getting /64s on the tracking interfaces as they should.

          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            seArs
            last edited by

            @bimmerdriver:

            […]If you want help, post your wan, lan, dhcp6 configurations.

            As I said before my setup on LAN is now static. So posting my settings wouldn't be very helpfull to the described tracking problem.

            Of course I can switch back to tracking WAN on the LAN interface and post the screenshots just to show there's a /60 address on the LAN interface, but this would only screw the whole setup.

            It all Comes down to one simple question:
            If you have a delegated /60 prefix and track it on other interfaces plus assigning an prefix ID, should the tracking interface configure itself with a /64 address, i.e. should it do the subnetting on it's own?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              seArs
              last edited by

              The screens requested…

              WAN config, LAN config and the resulting interface status

              wan.JPG
              wan.JPG_thumb
              lan.JPG
              lan.JPG_thumb
              if.JPG
              if.JPG_thumb

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DerelictD
                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                last edited by

                Hmm.

                What size PD are you actually getting? Turn on that debug on the WAN DHCP6 settings (Start DHCP6 client in debug mode) and search the DHCP logs for something like this:

                
                **dhcp6c[40011]: update a prefix 2600:dead:beef:a300::/56 pltime=140733193474432, vltime=34359824768**
                **dhcp6c[40011]:   IA_PD prefix: 2600:dead:beef:a300::/56 pltime=86400 vltime=86400**
                dhcp6c[40011]:   IA_NA address: 2600:dead:beef:b00:c11a:aaeb:decd:ff37 pltime=86400 vltime=86400
                dhcp6c[40011]: update an address 2600:dead:beef:b00:c11a:aaeb:decd:ff37 pltime=86400, vltime=140733193474432
                dhcp6c[40011]: add an address 2600:dead:beef:b00:c11a:aaeb:decd:ff37/128 on igb1
                
                

                You should be able to just filter the DHCP logs on process dhcp6c. Curious if you are actually getting a /56 and not a /60.

                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  bimmerdriver
                  last edited by

                  I'm not clear why you are referring to your configuration being static. Are you intending to operate with a static lan and not use dhcpv6? What if your prefix changes? If you don't have dhcpv6 enabled, you should do so, using assisted mode. You can set up static mappings later.

                  Something is causing the mask on your lan to be 60 instead of 64, so I suggest you reset to defaults and start over. At the very least, delete both the lan and wan interfaces and recreate them. I strongly recommend the former. As Derelict said and others will confirm, this works or we wouldn't be using it. It's possible to set up a fully operational dual stack system from scratch in a few minutes. It's been suggested before and I'll say it again, start with defaults wherever possible unless there is a very good reason to change them. When you get things working, then have your way with it. If you change a bunch of things before it's working, you won't know what is causing the problem.

                  FYI, I'm using a /56 and the prefix id is 8 bits. Since your prefix id is 4 bits, you seem to be getting a /60, but something caused the mask to get messed up so like I said, go back to first principles.

                  In your case, start with ipv4 and one lan. When that's working, add ipv6 and dhcpv6 using something like ::1000 to ::2000.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    seArs
                    last edited by

                    @Derelict:

                    […]
                    You should be able to just filter the DHCP logs on process dhcp6c. Curious if you are actually getting a /56 and not a /60.

                    That was causing my trouble!
                    I just tried to request everything from /48 down to /64, but everytime I only get /56 PDs. Looks like my ISP doesn't delegate anything else…

                    Setting the requested PD to /56 solves the problem with the tracking interfaces.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DerelictD
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by

                      Yeah I think there is a logic problem there in track interface. It uses 64 - what you request and adds that to the prefix you receive to determine the prefix length of the tracked interface.

                      So you were seeing 64 - 60 = 4 then 56 + 4 = 60. But 64 - 56 = 8 and, of course, 56 + 8 = 64.

                      Not sure why.

                      So if what you request doesn't match what you receive, it breaks.

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        bimmerdriver
                        last edited by

                        @Derelict:

                        Yeah I think there is a logic problem there in track interface. It uses 64 - what you request and adds that to the prefix you receive to determine the prefix length of the tracked interface.

                        So you were seeing 64 - 60 = 4 then 56 + 4 = 60. But 64 - 56 = 8 and, of course, 56 + 8 = 64.

                        Not sure why.

                        So if what you request doesn't match what you receive, it breaks.

                        Looks like a bug.

                        This is slightly OT, but I've been wondering what pfsense does in cases where the prefix is numerically smaller (e.g., /48). I can only get /56 so I have no way to experiment with prefix size. I understand the prefix id is only up to 8 bits. Does pfsense pad the difference with 0s? I think the prefix id should be up to whatever length is required to pad the delegated prefix to 64 bits. Only allowing up to 8 bits seems arbitrary. Or am I missing something?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DerelictD
                          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                          last edited by

                          @seArs:

                          @Derelict:

                          […]
                          You should be able to just filter the DHCP logs on process dhcp6c. Curious if you are actually getting a /56 and not a /60.

                          That was causing my trouble!
                          I just tried to request everything from /48 down to /64, but everytime I only get /56 PDs. Looks like my ISP doesn't delegate anything else…

                          Setting the requested PD to /56 solves the problem with the tracking interfaces.

                          Were you deleting the DUID each time? Pretty sure you have to do that in most cases or you might/should get the same PD you had before.

                          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            seArs
                            last edited by

                            @Derelict:

                            Were you deleting the DUID each time? Pretty sure you have to do that in most cases or you might/should get the same PD you had before.

                            I even did a complete reboot plus disabling/enbling the WAN interface each time.
                            I got different PDs with  requesting /48, /52, /56, /60 and /64, but they all were /56 according to the logs.

                            Now my only choice is to request what I would get anyway. It's no problem to live with this issue if you know how it works…

                            I'd vote for an option to show the leased PD in the Status --> Interfaces tab, just to avoid such things in the future.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DerelictD
                              Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                              last edited by

                              A reboot does not delete the DUID. It is designed to be persistent. You generally want the same prefix delegation each time.

                              Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                              A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                              DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                              Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                bimmerdriver
                                last edited by

                                You might try unselecting "do not send release". It could be that the edge router will not give a lease when there is an active lease. That's the case with my ISP edge router, which is nokia/alcatel 7750. It goes even further. If there is an active lease associated with a MAC, it will not give another lease for the same MAC until the active lease expires, even if the DUID is changed. The supposed reason for this according to my ISP is that the dhcp relay only looks at the MAC, but the dhcp server only looks at the DUID. It could also be that your ISP only gives /56 prefix, regardless of what you request.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  seArs
                                  last edited by

                                  @bimmerdriver:

                                  It could also be that your ISP only gives /56 prefix, regardless of what you request.

                                  It obviously does.
                                  As I said I got DIFFERENT PDs each try, but they all were /56. At least now I know what caused the issue.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.