Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    A Question on Network Cards, and my choice of hardware….

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    25 Posts 4 Posters 5.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V
      vimes
      last edited by

      @pfBasic:

      Yeah I don't know why it wouldn't hit the top burst frequency.

      There is probably a whole set of criteria for how Intel handles turbo boost and I don't know what it is.
      It also might be a windows thing? I really don't know.

      No worries and many thanks

      The point that CPU-Temp was able to show the multiplier at 24 and thus only 2.4Ghz is something set by Asrock, there is no manual override with this board for the clock frequency. I'm hoping that they will come back to me on that one within their forums and I've also contacted an Asrock rep.

      If I get a reply from either I'll post back here

      As a side note my AirVPN connection is now up and going.

      But somewhere I'll have to figure out why the firewall within pfsense is blocking my Usenet clients from connecting on ports 119 and ports 563.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W
        whosmatt
        last edited by

        @vimes:

        I did get the J335 and it is noted as 2Ghz but its burst rate should be up to 2.5Ghz, as you also noted :)

        But when I stressed it I then find it will show as 2.4Ghz and CPU-Temp will show it as 100x24.

        This should show as 2.5Ghz and 25x100 if it was to meet the spec of 2.5Ghz. The CPU was cool and not being throttled at the time due to heat.

        Did you stress it with a single thread or multiple?  It's my understanding that the max boost speed would only apply if a single core is stressed, and then only if power and thermal limits allow it.  If it's boosting to 2.4GHz on all cores then I'd say you're doing pretty well.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • V
          vimes
          last edited by

          Point taken about the cores.

          Considering that I have managed to get pfsense working now with my VPN connection and at around 75Mb the CPU is showing around 20% load all seems good.

          Just to satisfy my curiosity it would be interesting what Asrock will have to say. I still suspect that it is the BIOS limiting the CPU to a 24x multiplier. Which could be for thermal reasons due to the passive cooler fitted.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            Runenaldo
            last edited by

            my Asrock J3455-ITX is doing the same as your J3355, during multicore stress testing in prime95.

            it should hit 2.3GHz, but I'm only seeing 2.2GHz (multiplier x22)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • V
              vimes
              last edited by

              That's interesting. I wonder if it is a Asrock / BIOS means of thermal or stability control as I would doubt that it would be an Intel limitation.
              Asus also use some of these chips in similar boards but I haven't read about their limitations.

              They have not replied here….

              http://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=4787

              ... When I asked that question.

              I do feel kinda cheated...!  Lol

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                pfBasic Banned
                last edited by

                It probably has something to do with what whosmatt mentioned. I very much doubt that a huge supplier (or any supplier) like ASRock is crippling hardware secretly.

                This is probably just not the right way to test that.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P
                  pfBasic Banned
                  last edited by

                  It looks like a moderator did answer you over there:

                  If we check the specifications of your board's J3355 processor, we find that 2.5GHz is what Intel calls the "Burst Frequency".

                  http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/processors/celeron/j3355.html

                  Burst Frequency is similar to a Turbo speed of other Intel processors. The Turbo and Burst frequency/speed is not the maximum standard processor speed. Turbo speeds occur only on a subset of the processor cores under certain conditions and situations. The same is true for the Burst Frequency. Turbo and Burst speeds are not maintained on a continuous basis.

                  When stress testing an Intel processor with the Turbo feature, the maximum speed all the cores will achieve will be the maximum specified frequency, which is not the Turbo frequency. The same is true for the Burst frequency.

                  In the case of the J3455-ITX board, and its J3455 processor, the Burst Frequency is 2.3GHz:

                  http://ark.intel.com/products/95594/Intel-Celeron-Processor-J3455-2M-Cache-up-to-2_3-GHz

                  So this one is on Intel, or a slight misunderstanding of the specifications of these processors.

                  Similar response to what you got over here.

                  Especially since two people are seeing the same result on different CPUs, almost certainly either a misunderstanding of the technology, an error in testing method or both.
                  Highly unlikely (read, it isn't) a secret nerf from Intel or ASRock.

                  Burst does not = Turbo Boost, but there isn't any clear paper explaining it by Intel (that I've found).
                  https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Processors/Intel-Atom-Z3000-Series-Review-Bay-Trail-and-Silvermont-Arrive/Intel-Burst-and-Ac

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    vimes
                    last edited by

                    I think that it is more of how the board was advertised at Amazon which, for me, started the confusion….

                    ASRock J3355B-ITX J3355 2DDR3(SOD)/2S3/GL M-ITX ASRock Super Alloy Intel Dual-Core Processor J3355 (up to 2.5 GHz)

                    And in the motherboard spec at Amazon......

                    Processor Speed 2.5 GHz

                    Which should be amended.

                    ASRock J3355B-ITX 2DDR3(SOD)/2S3/GL M-ITX Motherboard - Grey

                    https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01M9EXCYB/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_0556ybD5VSKG1

                    At least we know.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      pfBasic Banned
                      last edited by

                      Oh yeah, those damn advertisements will get you!

                      When speccing your hardware it's always best to read the manufacturers spec (in this case Intel ARK).

                      When determining the CPU you need it's best to figure out about the minimum single core clock frequency you can get away with to do what you need, and buy something that meets (or very nearly meets) that as a base frequency. Turbo Boost and Burst frequencies can't be relied on to give you performance because of the way they are designed. Think of them as a bonus you'll get every now and then and you won't be disappointed.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • V
                        vimes
                        last edited by

                        How I do agree.!

                        I did check out the CPU with Intel to understand the TDP and then read….

                        Processor Base Frequency
                        2.00 GHz

                        Burst Frequency
                        2.50 GHz

                        What I didn't understand is how the burst mode values are arrived that. Sort of different to how my 6700k is listed.

                        It was important to know if the CPU supported the AES instruction set and, if needed, virtualization.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.