Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    First pfsense build, recommended dual-quad NIC?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    13 Posts 5 Posters 9.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      kujako
      last edited by

      Looking at building a pfsnese box to replace my aged Netscreen-25. I have an Intel Atom 525 box, but I need at least three zones, so I'm wanting to add a dual or quad NIC to the setup. Requirements are that it be low profile & PCIe.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        pfBasic Banned
        last edited by

        PRO/1000 - oldest, cheapest, highest power consumption, no virtualization

        i340 - newer, cheap, lowest power consumption, virtualization

        i350v2 - newest, most expensive, low power consumption, most virtualization

        Buy whichever you choose off eBay as a used server pull. You can also get knockoffs from China that will work.

        I recommend the i340-t4 as it is the best compromise IMO.

        You can also get a two port and a switch that supports VLANs, TPlink makes one for like $25.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          pfBasic Banned
          last edited by

          http://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-I340-T2-Dual-Port-Ethernet-Adapter-Card-49Y4232-/332093948632?hash=item4d525782d8:g:cykAAOSwjDZYfPtF

          https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00N0OHEMA/ref=twister_B06XDLVVF6?_encoding=UTF8&th=1

          $35

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            pfBasic Banned
            last edited by

            http://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-INTEL-QUAD-PORT-GIGABIT-PCI-E-SERVER-NETWORK-ADAPTER-CARD-49Y4242-I340-T4-/272599526777?hash=item3f7832ad79:g:Ga4AAOSwSlBY0Ynf

            $43

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              Guest
              last edited by

              Requirements are that it be low profile & PCIe.

              Intel 1000/Pro PT dual or quad port adapter is one of them most used NICs, it is using the (em) driver
              and it is also able to get a low profile and with low profile brackets too. Please be aware of the used
              server pulled IBM NICs! This cards are not all fully supported, some of them are needing to flash
              the original Intel Firmware on the NIC before they will nice play together with pfSense.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                Runenaldo
                last edited by

                @BlueKobold:

                Requirements are that it be low profile & PCIe.

                Intel 1000/Pro PT dual or quad port adapter is one of them most used NICs, it is using the (em) driver
                and it is also able to get a low profile and with low profile brackets too. Please be aware of the used
                server pulled IBM NICs! This cards are not all fully supported, some of them are needing to flash
                the original Intel Firmware on the NIC before they will nice play together with pfSense.

                I'm running an IBM intel i340-T4 quad card, what are the symptoms?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P
                  pfBasic Banned
                  last edited by

                  They work just fine.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • W
                    whosmatt
                    last edited by

                    @pfBasic:

                    PRO/1000 - oldest, cheapest, highest power consumption, no virtualization

                    Even the oldest PCIe Intel NICs are quite capable of working in a hypervisor (a virtualization host).  Just to be clear.  The newer ones have some extra features that can be useful when used with a hypervisor, but those have no bearing when running pfSense directly on the hardware.

                    The difference in power consumption between the older and newer hardware is real, but it's only a few watts.  That can matter to some, and be inconsequential to others.  Don't be afraid of the PRO/1000 or its Dell or HP or IBM implementations in a pfSense build.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      Guest
                      last edited by

                      I'm running an IBM intel i340-T4 quad card, what are the symptoms?

                      There where one talk to one of the staff members, stephenw or jimp or gonzopancho or jwt, I am not finding it back now so fast
                      to kink to that discussion, but there where a customer that bought a IBM branded Intel NIC, and IBM was putting their own firmware
                      image on that NIC and it was producing even the same instability and the user was getting out errors that cant be resolved away. And the end of that story was that one of the staff members said that he only can try out to put the original Intel firmware back on that NIC to get rid of the problem, but he wasnt able to realize this and must change the entire NIC then! So I personally would
                      be aware of rebranded NICs that comes with its own firmware flashed on, to get not into the same trouble, not more but
                      not less I was talking about.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P
                        pfBasic Banned
                        last edited by

                        The IBM rebranded NICs work great.

                        Plenty of people are using them in pfSense, myself included without issue.

                        I didn't know that you could still virtualize the PRO/1000, that's good to know!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kujako
                          last edited by

                          Thanks all. Found a Soekris net5501 in the back of my closet I think I'm going to use to try out pfsense to make sure it's for me before investing in any more hardware.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            Guest
                            last edited by

                            @kujako:

                            Thanks all. Found a Soekris net5501 in the back of my closet I think I'm going to use to try out pfsense to make sure it's for me before investing in any more hardware.

                            If this device will be going in a real usage and you also try to use it for VPN setups, you can speed up the IPsec from ~14 MBit/s
                            to ~42 MBit/s of throughput by attaching a small Soekris VPN1411 miniPCI card. (Only if needed or you are interested on that!)
                            Soekris vpn1411

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              kujako
                              last edited by

                              @BlueKobold:

                              @kujako:

                              Thanks all. Found a Soekris net5501 in the back of my closet I think I'm going to use to try out pfsense to make sure it's for me before investing in any more hardware.

                              If this device will be going in a real usage and you also try to use it for VPN setups, you can speed up the IPsec from ~14 MBit/s
                              to ~42 MBit/s of throughput by attaching a small Soekris VPN1411 miniPCI card. (Only if needed or you are interested on that!)
                              Soekris vpn1411

                              Nifty, thanks for the link.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.