Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PC Engines apu2 experiences

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    711 Posts 73 Posters 854.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      Guest
      last edited by

      Can anyone tell me how to install on all available storage capacity?

      Where you want to install pfSense? In a mSATA, USB drive or a real HDD/SSD?
      If you take an usb drive and put on it the MEMSTICK-Serial-AM64 image and the you install from there onto a…....
      That is a fresh and full install and might be the best bet for you.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        Af0x
        last edited by

        hi, thanks you guys. I already downloaded and installed on my mSATA. During Installation you get the choice like on the picture:
        https://doc.pfsense.org/images/1/11/Installer_05_select_console.png

        I chose embedded but I read that it has reduced possibilities talking about packages.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          hda
          last edited by

          @Af0x:

          …mSATA...

          APU2 & mSata ? >>> 64-bit Full Install.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • O
            Ofloo
            last edited by

            apu1d4: throughput was arround 700mbit/s ~ 900mbit/s, when i first bought it pfsense did 500mbit/s later on that changed
            apu3a4: throughput is 250mbit/s ~ 300mbit/s

            What i do notice is that apu1d4 uses realtek(re) drivers and the apu3 uses intel(igb)
            for the igb driver: TSO LRO .. checksum offload turned on or off makes no difference

            strange thing is when I run iperf through vlan but not hosted on the router but on a server on a different subnet which is routed though the router i get

            –----------------------------------------------------------
            [  3] local 192.168.1.100 port 44774 connected with 172.18.1.11 port 5001
            [ ID] Interval      Transfer    Bandwidth
            [  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  715 MBytes  600 Mbits/sec

            when i turn on tso lro checksum offload, cpu rather then hiadapt to maximum

            ------------------------------------------------------------
            Client connecting to loki, TCP port 5001
            TCP window size: 85.0 KByte (default)
            ------------------------------------------------------------
            [  3] local 192.168.1.100 port 45468 connected with 172.18.1.11 port 5001
            [ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
            [  3]  0.0-10.0 sec   757 MBytes   635 Mbits/sec
            
            ------------------------------------------------------------
            Client connecting to loki, TCP port 5001
            TCP window size: 85.0 KByte (default)
            ------------------------------------------------------------
            [  3] local 192.168.1.100 port 45462 connected with 172.18.1.11 port 5001
            [ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
            [  3]  0.0-10.0 sec   742 MBytes   622 Mbits/sec
            
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              Guest
              last edited by

              apu1d4: throughput was arround 700mbit/s ~ 900mbit/s, when i first bought it pfsense did 500mbit/s later on that changed

              Without PowerD (hi adaptive) it was more around ~450 - 550 MBit/s but with "turned on" PowerD it Comes nearly to that numbers
              like you are naming here, ~650 MBit/s - 750 MBit/s and yes for sure that can be different from OS to OS! From FreeBSD to Linux
              as the base system, such as IPFire or ZeroShell are based on due to the better driver support.

              apu3a4: throughput is 250mbit/s ~ 300mbit/s

              The APU1D4 and APU2C4 are regular boards that was produced for the whole public, but likes in the past too, there
              are options, that you might be calling for a customized board based on the number of boards you must then buy.
              Let us say 150 - 1000 as a minimum and in former times this boards where then only for you or that customer and
              not available for the rest of us or the whole public customers, this was changing now, and so rests of such a special
              version or customized board will now also available to the public by sale. But please accept that this APU3 boards are
              optimized for LTE usage, also the LAN ports as I am right informed and this might be then driving such a throughput
              test in a total other direction! If you are using 3G and/or LTE modems inside  this will be then perhaps once more
              again differing from what you see now or get out now!

              What i do notice is that apu1d4 uses realtek(re) drivers and the apu3 uses intel(igb)
              for the igb driver: TSO LRO .. checksum offload turned on or off makes no difference

              That might be shinning as the changing point for sure and first of all, but there are also two other things
              that will be interesting now. The PowerD is bursting the APU1 cpu (T40E dual core) much more then the
              APU2 cpu (GX-412TC quad core) that is taking not really a benefit well from activating this PowerD option
              and then the igb(4) driver is now also multi cpu threading but even not the PPPoE part!

              I don´t know if that "optimized option" will be able to change or something else, but perhaps this might be
              then pushing that number somehow in the high, if there will be an option to change them. Perhaps in the BIOS!?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • VeldkornetV
                Veldkornet
                last edited by

                Has anyone  updated to the latest BIOS?

                I noticed in pfSense that the system is now just seen as "pfSense" where as it was "PC Engines APU2"
                See screenshots.

                Not that the name really matters to me, was just wondering others had the same.

                Before.png
                Before.png_thumb
                After.png
                After.png_thumb

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  kevindd992002
                  last edited by

                  @Veldkornet:

                  Has anyone  updated to the latest BIOS?

                  I noticed in pfSense that the system is now just seen as "pfSense" where as it was "PC Engines APU2"
                  See screenshots.

                  Not that the name really matters to me, was just wondering others had the same.

                  I didn't even know that there was an updated BIOS until I read your reply, lol. Is there a way to be notified with these updates from pcengines?

                  I'd have to wait for a week to have access to a null modem, so I can't update my APU2 until then.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • VeldkornetV
                    Veldkornet
                    last edited by

                    I just updated it via SSH.

                    You just need to install the "flashrom" package.

                    So basically:

                    pkg install flashrom
                    

                    Download the firmware from here

                    Unzip the download and copy the .rom file to /tmp. Then flash with the following:

                    flashrom -w /tmp/apu2_v4.0.7.rom -p internal
                    

                    Once done, reboot.

                    *Edit: Updated to use the flashrom package from pfsense

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      kevindd992002
                      last edited by

                      Oh ok, I didn't know you can do that. I was referring to following the BIOS update instructions in pcengine's website using tinycore.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • VeldkornetV
                        Veldkornet
                        last edited by

                        Yeah, TinyCore in anyway uses flashrom.

                        If you look here on the PC Engines GitHub site, they mention that you just need flashrom.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          doktornotor Banned
                          last edited by

                          @Veldkornet:

                          I just updated it via SSH.

                          You just need to install the "flashrom" package, which needs some dependencies of course. At least, this is what I've just done.

                          No need to use FreeBSD repo for this or mess manually with dependencies. Flashrom is being used for Netgate_Coreboot_Upgrade package so it's already there in pfSense repo.

                          
                          # pkg search flashrom
                          flashrom-0.9.9_1               Utility for reading, writing, verifying, and erasing flash ROM chips
                          
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • VeldkornetV
                            Veldkornet
                            last edited by

                            @doktornotor:

                            @Veldkornet:

                            I just updated it via SSH.

                            You just need to install the "flashrom" package, which needs some dependencies of course. At least, this is what I've just done.

                            No need to use FreeBSD repo for this or mess manually with dependencies. Flashrom is being used for Netgate_Coreboot_Upgrade package so it's already there in pfSense repo.

                            
                            # pkg search flashrom
                            flashrom-0.9.9_1               Utility for reading, writing, verifying, and erasing flash ROM chips
                            
                            

                            Aha, nice, that's easier. I didn't even check that :) I updated my post to show the use of the pfsense version, to avoid any unnecessary confusion.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              kevindd992002
                              last edited by

                              So i assume I just need to run the flashrom syntax under the pfsense shell and i'm all set?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • VeldkornetV
                                Veldkornet
                                last edited by

                                @kevindd992002:

                                So i assume I just need to run the flashrom syntax under the pfsense shell and i'm all set?

                                Yup, pretty much. I've updated my initial post showing the use of the pfsense flashrom package instead. So it's a lot simpler now.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JailerJ
                                  Jailer
                                  last edited by

                                  @Veldkornet:

                                  Has anyone  updated to the latest BIOS?

                                  I noticed in pfSense that the system is now just seen as "pfSense" where as it was "PC Engines APU2"
                                  See screenshots.

                                  Not that the name really matters to me, was just wondering others had the same.

                                  Mine still says PC Engines APU2 after the update to 2.3.4.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • VeldkornetV
                                    Veldkornet
                                    last edited by

                                    @Jailer:

                                    Mine still says PC Engines APU2 after the update to 2.3.4.

                                    Yeah, mine did too. I more meant after the latest firmware update.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • K
                                      kevindd992002
                                      last edited by

                                      @Veldkornet:

                                      @kevindd992002:

                                      So i assume I just need to run the flashrom syntax under the pfsense shell and i'm all set?

                                      Yup, pretty much. I've updated my initial post showing the use of the pfsense flashrom package instead. So it's a lot simpler now.

                                      Thanks. I've just done the update and I get the same results regarding the 'System' as yours. I guess it's pfsense not detecting the APU properly because of a newer version.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • B
                                        blimpyboy
                                        last edited by

                                        I've just taken delivery of a couple of new APU2C2 units today - I need to install pfSense 2.3.4-RELEASE tomorrow and will be taking them to two of my customers on Monday.  I've been using Alix 2D3 units for years so a bit of a culture shock to my standard build procedure!

                                        First thing I'd like to be clear on is which BIOS I should be using.  The boards arrived with 160307 so I looked in the PCEngines 'BIOS Update' area and have flashed one of the boards with 160311.  I then came across this post and I'm now thinking I should be flashing with 4.0.7.  It's hard to be sure that this is the most recent as the accompanying text is pretty vague - the versioning pattern is also confusing going from 160311 to 4.0.7!  The date stamp on 160311 is 12th March 2016 and 4.0.7 is 28th Feb 2017 so I assume that's the one I should be using?  The 4.5.5 file is marked as 'experimantal' so I 'll steer clear of that for now I think!

                                        Before I go to the next stage of workoing out how to get pfSense v2.3.4-Rel (hot off the press yesterday!) on my 16GB mSATA SSD units, could you guys just confirm that I should indeed be using BIOS 4.0.7.

                                        One last observation is that the board I've not yet flashed shows 'SeaBIOS (version ?-20160307_153453_michael-desktop64)' on my PuTTY serial screen when the unit starts up - quite a strange stamp, but it does have the '160307' sub-string in there so must be correct.  However, I've just flashed the other board with 4.0.7 and the serial output at startup reads 'SeaBIOS (version rel-1.10.0.1)'.  I'm hoping that's all in agreement with what other people see when they take a look at their pfSense boot screens!

                                        Regards
                                        Ian

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • JailerJ
                                          Jailer
                                          last edited by

                                          I'm still running the 160311 that the board shipped with without issue. If it aint broke don't fix it.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • VeldkornetV
                                            Veldkornet
                                            last edited by

                                            4.0.7 is indeed the latest as far as I am aware. Maybe the way that they note the updates here makes more sense? Looks like they were using the date and now they've switched to actual version numbers.

                                            I was also running 160311 up until yesterday, didn't really have any issues either.

                                            FYI, this is the changelog for 4.0.7:

                                            
                                            coreboot https://github.com/pcengines/coreboot/blob/coreboot-4.0.x/CHANGELOG.md
                                            	reduced log level: display mainboard, DRAM and ECC info only
                                            	improved SD card performance
                                            	forced to use SD in 2.0 mode
                                            	reset J17 GPIO's (NCT5104D) during boot to inputs
                                            	update sortbootorder to v4.0.3 (UART C/D toggling)
                                            	mPCIe1 working with ASM1061 based sata controllers (mPCIe2 still not working)
                                            	fixed RAM size displaying during the boot (for 2GB sku's)
                                            
                                            iPXE (no changelog available yet)
                                            	added autoboot command
                                            
                                            seabios https://github.com/pcengines/seabios/blob/coreboot-4.0.x/CHANGELOG.md
                                            	allowed for one-time PXE boot with N key
                                            	enable/disable option for USB boot
                                            	enable/disable option for PXE boot
                                            
                                            sortbootorder https://github.com/pcengines/sortbootorder/blob/coreboot-4.0.x/CHANGELOG.md
                                            	EHCI0 controller disable/enable option
                                            	UART C and D toggling
                                            
                                            memtest86+ https://github.com/pcengines/memtest86plus/blob/coreboot-4.0.x/CHANGELOG.md
                                            	refreshed procedure, so that full screen content is reprinted on refresh
                                            	macro SPD_DISABLED for disabling SPD related functionality
                                            	refresh option label (l) to bottom menu
                                            
                                            
                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.