Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Significantly reduced idle state power consumption

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    11 Posts 5 Posters 3.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      coxhaus
      last edited by

      I agree low power is a good thing but costs need to be considered.  I have an old Intel 40 watt low voltage Xeon which I use in my pfsense machine.  I built this machine 10 years and it was low power back then.  Now days not so much.

      I can't see spending $400 to replace my current machine so I can save 30 watts.  What I have works great.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        patrick0525
        last edited by

        At first this mobo was coupled with an old 2005 non-80+ psu consumed 38W. This bothered 😕 me until I realized it was the psu was the culprit. The Thermaltake psu helped but it was 500W and only a 80+ efficiency.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          If you look at the specs for 80 plus you'll note that Gold does not have an efficiency requirement for even 10% rating. A 500W PSU running at 23W is <5% of it's rating. Actually less than that as that's the output power which will be less than the measured input. It's almost certainly worse than 80% efficient anyway.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/80_Plus

          Random link for reference: https://uk.hardware.info/reviews/4683/3/45-psus-tested-at-very-low-loads-which-one-is-the-most-efficient-225-watt-test (may contain internet fact!)

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            patrick0525
            last edited by

            Thermaltake 80+ was "improve power consumption attempt #1" and was only $20 after rebate.

            Several weeks ago, I saw the same link and did purchase an Antec 380W EA-380D earthwatt 80+ bronze to test (attempt #2) with this mobo. The Antec was marginally better than the 500W Thermaltake and idle consumption was around 22-23W. It wasn't worth the effort to swap out the Thermaltake psu until I found an eBay 80+ gold psu that was reasonably priced with a 80-84% efficiency at 25W. As a guide for the 10% load, I used
            https://plugloadsolutions.com/80PlusPowerSuppliesDetail.aspx?id=26&type=2

            Last week, I found an Dell L265EM-00 for $15 that looked like a possible solution. I already repurposed the Antec for the wife's desktop.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Mmm, 88% efficiency at 10% load is pretty good. That would appear to beat even a Pico PSU style DC-DC PSU when you include the external power brick. In most cases at least.

              Steve

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T
                tirsojrp
                last edited by

                Top efficiency is at 50% load. A low power machine using less than 10% would never achieve it.

                At such load I would use a pico-psu with a level vi brick.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P
                  patrick0525
                  last edited by

                  stephenw10, if the Antec consumption was 22.0W(best of my knowledge) @71.2% efficiency then the Dell psu would be rated @85% efficiency which is similar to the plugloadsoultions.com spreadsheet results for gold model psu under 10% load. From what I researched pico psu have high efficiency but their cost $40+ make it prohibitively expensive unless you have space restrictions due to a mini itx case. I can live with a micro ATX case.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • H
                    Harvy66
                    last edited by

                    Does that $6.50 in savings include reduced heat leading to less AC needed?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Or additional heating required depending on your location.  ;)

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P
                        patrick0525
                        last edited by

                        You are both correct and a much smaller carbon footprint for our future generations. Lol

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.