• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Hardware advice

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
3 Posts 2 Posters 1.0k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L
    Lectrician
    last edited by Jun 30, 2014, 5:38 AM

    Looking to replace my aged desktop running pfsence 2.0.1.

    Currently two 4M DSL lines go into a load balance router and then into the pfsence box.  I run the box as a pub wifi server.  The captive portal is in use, customised to log users name, email, postcode into a flat file database, sending emails out with each new user.

    I also use the proxy server to log sites visited (can I limit proxy disk space and still log all sites?).

    BT infinity is due to be available soon, and was planning on getting two 80/20 lines installed, and expect to achieve near to 70-80M.

    What sort of hardware is best?  Can I just get an I5 or I7 tower with plenty of RAM?

    Thanks.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by Jun 30, 2014, 6:19 PM

      Any reason you're not using pfSense to load balance the connections?

      160/40 is not a particularly high throughput, you could handle that with an Atom. Adding Squid to the mix will increase that requirement but I would still expect a relatively recent Atom to handle it.
      An i5 or i7 is probably overkill for this application unless you plan on adding, say, Snort or using VPNs extensively.

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • L
        Lectrician
        last edited by Jul 3, 2014, 6:15 AM

        Thanks.

        The router was in place to load balance before I went with pfsence, so it remained.  There are a couple network connections in front of the pfsence box too, so it was just left as is.

        I prefer a little overkill :-)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        1 out of 3
        • First post
          1/3
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
          This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
          consent.not_received