Any plans to support Virtual Tunnel Interfaces (VTI) for IPSEC VPNs?
-
Routed IPsec is on our radar, no specific time frame or implementation details though.
-
Hello Jimp
I understand your answer, but this post date December 2015 when I thought meantime you had more news.
This function is essential for choosing our future equipment.
It is boring to choose a fortigate because pfsense Not VTI Routed IPsec . :'(Thanks for the reply
Best regards,
fred
-
Hello guys,
We have any news regarding Virtual Tunnel Interfaces (VTI) for IPSEC VPNs on PfSense equipments ?
Regards,
dimostin -
Not possible currently, but the code for VTI was recently imported to FreeBSD, so it is going to show up in a future version eventually.
-
+1 for this:)
-
+1 :)
-
It will be in pfSense 2.5, which will be based on FreeBSD 12, which has the IPsec VTI code. No ETA on that though, probably at least a year out, likely more.
-
Jim, what flavor of BGP will the new VTI code utilize, and would you be willing to add a module for the BIRD internet routing daemon?
-
It's too early to say for any of that. We are looking at FRR for all routing functionality though, no current plans for bird
-
If you could please consider BIRD for inclusion.ย My router expert friend assures me BIRD is much more powerful and better architected than FRR.
-
If you could please consider BIRD for inclusion.ย My router expert friend assures me BIRD is much more powerful and better architected than FRR.
Our router expert employees prefer FRR/Quagga and assure us it's better than BIRD in various ways.