Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Looking to self-build a pfsense box - opinion on this i3 quad intel box?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    6 Posts 3 Posters 5.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      Spectrum48k
      last edited by

      Looked everywhere for hardware and this seems to be an excellent contender for a home appliance.

      CPU - intel i3 4005u
      RAM - 1x DDR3L up to 8GB
      STORAGE - mSATA, SATA, USB3.0, USB2.0
      LAN - 4x Intel i211-AT
      VIDEO - Intel, HDMI

      More info here:
      http://www.ebay.com/itm/4-Gigabit-LAN-core-I3-4005U-Industrial-home-router-PFsense-firewall-Barebone-/262940660918

      Opinions? With it being an i3, I'm guessing it'll happily do over 100Mb/s?

      pfSense 2.4.1
      Intel Atom E3845 Quad Core 1.9GHz AES-NI
      Intel Gigabit Ethernet x4
      pico-ITX form factor
      16GB mSATA
      2GB DDR3L

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        tim.mcmanus
        last edited by

        i3 is overkill, you will barely use the CPU.  But, yes, it will handle a lot of traffic, and encryption over that traffic if you want to use it as a VPN.  It'll barely break a sweat.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          Spectrum48k
          last edited by

          I suppose it's future proof - my ISP here in the UK keeps doubling my speed at no extra cost. Its going up 50Mbps to 100Mbps soon, so I'm guessing in a year or two an i3 might be ideal, although they do a J1900 Celeron too? Might check out the TDP figures and see what's the best fit.

          Tried looking for just a motherboard with dual intel LAN which ARE about, ie the H270N and H270M from Asrock and Gigabyte, but then you need to find a low TDP processor and looking through the latest Skylake and Kaby Lake, they all seem to start at 35W. Why did Intel abandon the Atom? I wonder how long til we see an ARM based board with dual LAN, pushing 100Mbps?

          pfSense 2.4.1
          Intel Atom E3845 Quad Core 1.9GHz AES-NI
          Intel Gigabit Ethernet x4
          pico-ITX form factor
          16GB mSATA
          2GB DDR3L

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • GertjanG
            Gertjan
            last edited by

            @Spectrum48k:

            pliance.
            …..
            CPU - intel i3 4005u
            RAM - 1x DDR3L up to 8GB
            STORAGE - mSATA, SATA, USB3.0, USB2.0
            LAN - 4x Intel i211-AT
            VIDEO - Intel, HDMI

            I3 or not - check with the upcoming 2.4 version : https://www.netgate.com/blog/pfsense-software-version-2-4-release-highlights.html and make sure your specs include the" AES-NI"  hardware.

            No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
            Edit : and where are the logs ??

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              Spectrum48k
              last edited by

              @Gertjan:

              @Spectrum48k:

              pliance.
              …..
              CPU - intel i3 4005u
              RAM - 1x DDR3L up to 8GB
              STORAGE - mSATA, SATA, USB3.0, USB2.0
              LAN - 4x Intel i211-AT
              VIDEO - Intel, HDMI

              I3 or not - check with the upcoming 2.4 version : https://www.netgate.com/blog/pfsense-software-version-2-4-release-highlights.html and make sure your specs include the" AES-NI"  hardware.

              Hah, 'R-1, because the Empire needs a better firewall" !!!

              This R-1 is looking niiiice - where does it fit into the product portfolio? Will it replace the SG-2220?

              pfSense 2.4.1
              Intel Atom E3845 Quad Core 1.9GHz AES-NI
              Intel Gigabit Ethernet x4
              pico-ITX form factor
              16GB mSATA
              2GB DDR3L

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T
                tim.mcmanus
                last edited by

                @Spectrum48k:

                I suppose it's future proof - my ISP here in the UK keeps doubling my speed at no extra cost. Its going up 50Mbps to 100Mbps soon, so I'm guessing in a year or two an i3 might be ideal, although they do a J1900 Celeron too? Might check out the TDP figures and see what's the best fit.

                Tried looking for just a motherboard with dual intel LAN which ARE about, ie the H270N and H270M from Asrock and Gigabyte, but then you need to find a low TDP processor and looking through the latest Skylake and Kaby Lake, they all seem to start at 35W. Why did Intel abandon the Atom? I wonder how long til we see an ARM based board with dual LAN, pushing 100Mbps?

                In 10 years it'll still be overkill.  The specs in my sig were running 2 x 1Gb LAN links, and 2 x 100Mb WAN links.  A persistent SSL site-to-site VPN tunnel, VPN connections, several web servers, and dozens of users behind it.  Several pfSense packages and some creative policies/routing too.  The CPU never went above 15% at any time.  And it was a dual-core CPU.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.