Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Link agregation for multi wan configuration possible ??

    General pfSense Questions
    2
    8
    998
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      azoijfe
      last edited by

      Hello guys,

      I was wondering if it is possible to do a link agregation of 2 WAN with the same speed connection to double my downloading speed of a single file. I'm not talking here about a load balancing configuration which will allow me to double my bandwith if 'im downloading multiple files .

      If you any idea let me know, I didn't find any thing relevant so far…

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by

        It doesn't work that way.. No you can not do this..

        You can not even do it on a local lan..  Lagg, port channel, etherchannel, teaming, whatever you want to call it.. does not bond the nics together to create a fatter faster nic.. Its just 1 and 1, doesn't mean it = 2..

        While you can load share different sessions across such a connection.. Firs a single session you will only ever go across one of the nics.  And even if you create multiple sessions across such a connection.  Your still talking mac to mac, which is only going to go across one of the nics..

        If you need a faster/fatter connection - your solution is to get a faster fatter connection..

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          It doesn't work that way - end of story…  If you need faster fatter, then get faster fatter..

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            azoijfe
            last edited by

            Ok thank you very much for your answer

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              What kind of download are you trying to make faster.. Are you actually filling up your pipe?  If not filling your pipe you could do a multisegmented download to speed it up..  Depends on how the file is being served. http, ftp, sftp, webdav, etc.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                azoijfe
                last edited by

                It is for torrents or newsgroups files. It seems that I'm filling up my pipe from the download speed I see but I'm not aware of a test protocol for that.

                The thing is that I won't die if I don't get a faster connection but because I'm quite new to pfsense and I still want to learn more by doing projects like I think a big part of the community. I was wondering if I could do this kind of agregation because I have a second WAN in my house. And also I come from France and there is a company here that sells a service that allows you to do that using a protocol called MPTCP derived from TCP and a proxy. This is the link if you don't speak french google trad could help you : https://www.ovh.com/fr/blog/dessous-techniques-overthebox-ovhtelecom/
                But let's be clear this exceed by far my knowledge in network so perhaps it is not revelant…?

                Basically I was just curious about that and wanted to try it...

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  I know what mptcp is ;)

                  But its not in pfsense, nor is it freebsd as of yet that I am aware of
                  https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4632

                  mptcp is NOT link aggregation btw.. Should of mentioned mptcp in the subject and your post right from the get go ;)

                  Torrent files are going to be multiple multiple sessions for sure.  So that could take advantage of load sharing across your 2 wans..
                  https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-WAN#Load_Balancing

                  As to newsgroups.. You pull your files even if they are broken up into multi parts from the same news server..  So such a thing no would not really take advantage of load balancing across your wan links.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    azoijfe
                    last edited by

                    Sorry that I didn't mention mptcp from the beginning but I didn't want someone to think that I wanted to use this protocol particularly to achieve what I wanted even more when I'm not sure of what this protocol exactly is  :D

                    Thank you for the links, I think I'm going to put in place a load balancing configuration !

                    Just a stupid I can't really see why you can't have protocol or something capable of : "Hello Server  I'm Wan1 I want to download this file but you can send packets to this adresses Wan 1 and Wan 2. Then after behind the Wans you have a bond that can reorder the packets in order to obtain your complete file and deliver it to the local machine that was doing the request" ? I agree it seems a bit complicated like that but not impossible from my amateur point of view…

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.