Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    502 Bad Gateway (nginx) after Update to 2.3

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
    93 Posts 44 Posters 61.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      tward800
      last edited by

      It's probably something i did wrong.  Like I said I'm not familiar with BSD, and only used patch a couple of times.

      Saved the patch listed in this thread as rc.php_ini_setup.patch

      Here's a recreation of what I did.

      /etc: patch rc.php_ini_setup rc.php_ini_setup.patch
      Hmm…  Looks like a unified diff to me...
      The text leading up to this was:

      -- /etc/rc.php_ini_setup      2017-07-06 19:35:29.000000000 +0100

      +++ /etc/rc.php_ini_setup        2017-11-22 21:05:24.986893000 +0000
      Patching file rc.php_ini_setup using Plan A...
      Hunk #1 failed at 265.
      Hunk #2 succeeded at 317 with fuzz 1.
      Hunk #3 succeeded at 327 with fuzz 1.
      Hunk #4 succeeded at 341.
      1 out of 4 hunks failed--saving rejects to rc.php_ini_setup.rej
      done

      -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel        1366 Nov 28 05:58 rc.php_ini_setup.patch
      -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel        9395 Nov 28 05:58 rc.php_ini_setup.orig
      -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel        9459 Nov 28 05:59 rc.php_ini_setup
      -rw-------  1 root  wheel        456 Nov 28 05:59 rc.php_ini_setup.rej

      /etc: cat rc.php_ini_setup.rej
      @@ -265,10 +265,22 @@

      PHPFPMMAX=3
      +PHPFPMIDLE=30
      +PHPFPMSTART=1
      +PHPFPMSPARE=2
      +PHPFPMREQ=500
      if [ $REALMEM -lt 250 ]; then
              PHPFPMMAX=2
      +      PHPFPMIDLE=5
      +      PHPFPMSTART=1
      +      PHPFPMSPARE=1
      +      PHPFPMREQ=500
      elif [ ${REALMEM} -gt 1000 ]; then
      -      PHPFPMMAX=4
      +      PHPFPMMAX=8
      +      PHPFPMIDLE=3600
      +      PHPFPMSTART=2
      +      PHPFPMSPARE=7
      +      PHPFPMREQ=5000
      fi

      /bin/cat > /usr/local/lib/php-fpm.conf < <eof<br>/etc: diff rc.php_ini_setup.orig rc.php_ini_setup
      308c308
      < pm.process_idle_timeout = 5
      –-

      pm.process_idle_timeout = $PHPFPMIDLE
      310c310
      < pm.max_requests = 500


      pm.max_requests = $PHPFPMREQ
      318c318
      < pm.process_idle_timeout = 5


      pm.process_idle_timeout = $PHPFPMIDLE
      320,321c320,321
      < pm.start_servers = 1
      < pm.max_requests = 500


      pm.start_servers = $PHPFPMSTART
      pm.max_requests = $PHPFPMREQ
      323c323
      < pm.max_spare_servers=1


      pm.max_spare_servers= $PHPFPMSPARE
      332c332
      < pm.max_requests = 500


      pm.max_requests = $PHPFPMREQ</eof<br>

      After that I just restored the saved copy and just manually make the changes.  Still working great.  I'm using a PC engines apu2c2 and memory usage is about 12 percent  Thanks again.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GrimsonG
        Grimson Banned
        last edited by

        @tward800:

        It's probably something i did wrong.  Like I said I'm not familiar with BSD, and only used patch a couple of times.

        Saved the patch listed in this thread as rc.php_ini_setup.patch

        Use the System_Patches package, makes it a lot easier.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          Guest
          last edited by

          Ah, not familiar with the pfSense patch system.  :)

          OK, first thing to do is reverse what you have done, put everything back as it was.

          Next, go into pfSense and select Package Manager from the System Menu, select 'Available Packages' and find the 'System Patches' package and install it.

          You will now have a 'Patches' option in the system menu - Select it.

          Click on add new patch.

          In the URL/Commit ID enter the patch ID 028be76, give a description in the Description box and press save.

          Now click on Test, it should say can be applied cleanly. Now click on Apply.

          Job done.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T
            tward800
            last edited by

            Thank you again.  I replaced the original file and re-applied the patch the proper way for pfSense.  Other than some extra spaces I had it correct.
            The router continues to be stable with this patch.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              Guest
              last edited by

              That's good.

              The advantage of using the patch system, apart from saving you a lot of work, is that you have a setting in the patch that allows for it to be automatically re-applied when you update pfSense. It checks to see whether it can be re-applied cleanly and does so. Obviously, if the file(s) the patches are applied against change in a way that means the patch will not cleanly apply then it does not do so, so when you use patches it's advisable to check after an update. For the average user who is not on the beta trail this means only a two or three times a year, beta testers should check every time they update.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                chrcoluk
                last edited by

                tward800 thanks for your feedback, even if there is no problems, feedback is good, as it helps developers make a decision on if a patch is safe enough to rollout or not.

                pfSense CE 2.8.0

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  sandern
                  last edited by

                  The patch gives me some errors when I test it:

                  /usr/bin/patch –directory=/ -t -p2 -i /var/patches/5a269040d9477.patch --check --forward --ignore-whitespace

                  Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
                  The text leading up to this was:

                  |From 2c131b10b25db593331048d4f2b28fbf9bf5662e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
                  |From: marjohn56
                  |Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:18:51 +0000
                  |Subject: [PATCH] Increase FPM process availability in high ram systems
                  |
                  |To reduce chance of nginx gateway error when interacting with FPM backend, this patch does the following, starts up extra FOM server processes at startup, allows more to stay running on standby, increases automatic shutdown time from 5 seconds to one hour.  On systems with a gig or more of ram
                  |–-
                  | src/etc/rc.php_ini_setup | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
                  | 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
                  |
                  |diff --git a/src/etc/rc.php_ini_setup b/src/etc/rc.php_ini_setup
                  |index 5ce0ef7a31..03bc1178d9 100755
                  |--- a/src/etc/rc.php_ini_setup

                  +++ b/src/etc/rc.php_ini_setup
                  Patching file etc/rc.php_ini_setup using Plan A...
                  Hunk #1 succeeded at 265.
                  Hunk #2 failed at 317.
                  Hunk #3 failed at 340.
                  2 out of 3 hunks failed while patching etc/rc.php_ini_setup
                  done

                  I'm using a new Pfsense 2.4.2 install and using the patch manager from the gui.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ?
                    Guest
                    last edited by

                    Try patch 2c131b1.

                    Yes, I had to re-sync with upstream. In doing so my Github desktop threw one and I had to pull it back and re-do the PR. However, it's against 2.4.3, so it may not work for 2.4.2 now.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      sandern
                      last edited by

                      @marjohn56:

                      Try patch 2c131b1.

                      Yes, I had to re-sync with upstream. In doing so my Github desktop threw one and I had to pull it back and re-do the PR. However, it's against 2.4.3, so it may not work for 2.4.2 now.

                      Exactly the same error, so indeed not for 2.4.2. I'll do the changes manually :)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        BeerCan
                        last edited by

                        @marjohn56:

                        Try patch 2c131b1.

                        Yes, I had to re-sync with upstream. In doing so my Github desktop threw one and I had to pull it back and re-do the PR. However, it's against 2.4.3, so it may not work for 2.4.2 now.

                        I am getting patch fetch failed when I try this

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          Guest
                          last edited by

                          Works fine for me, just re-entered that I'd and fetched it again, no problem.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B
                            BeerCan
                            last edited by

                            @marjohn56:

                            Works fine for me, just re-entered that I'd and fetched it again, no problem.

                            Does this look right?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              Guest
                              last edited by

                              Strange I get a different ID.

                              Try the full ID 2c131b10b25db593331048d4f2b28fbf9bf5662e

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                BeerCan
                                last edited by

                                That fails as well
                                here is what is in the log

                                Dec 5 16:46:00 	php-fpm 	70317 	/system_patches.php: Download file failed with status code 0\. URL: https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/2c131b10b25db593331048d4f2b28fbf9bf5662e.patch 
                                
                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  Guest
                                  last edited by

                                  This is silly.  ???

                                  Here's the full URL that I have just used.

                                  https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/2c131b1.patch

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B
                                    BeerCan
                                    last edited by

                                    will not fetch that one either.  This is weird

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • L
                                      lordalfa
                                      last edited by

                                      BeerCan, can you get into https://github.com

                                      If your browser gives you an error, you will have problems downloading. It is something to do with HSTS.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • B
                                        BeerCan
                                        last edited by

                                        @lordalfa:

                                        BeerCan, can you get into https://github.com

                                        If your browser gives you an error, you will have problems downloading. It is something to do with HSTS.

                                        I can't get in with FF or chrome

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • ?
                                          Guest
                                          last edited by

                                          Even stranger… :)

                                          I think this is one for the Netgate developers to answer, as they maintain it.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • P
                                            PiBa
                                            last edited by

                                            I don t think netgate maintains the github.com certificates.
                                            It sounds to me like like a invasive proxy with ssl bump.

                                            Edit:
                                            Or perhaps pfBlocker dnsblock list that redirects to a pfSense hosted site for tracking blocking statistics..

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.